Morphological Buffering in Neuro-Architecture: Interactive Effects of Color, Shape, and Area Proportion on Affective Processing.

Overview

1. College of Arts, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Abstract

While architectural visual features significantly influence human emotion, the spatiotemporal neuro-mechanisms underlying their interactive effects remain poorly under-researched. This study systematically decoupled the dynamics of indoor spatial perception by investigating the interactive impacts of color combination, color shape, and area proportion to find out the effects on participants’ emotion. By integrating high-resolution electroencephalography (EEG), specifically analyzing the N200, late positive potential (LPP), Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA), and Beta bands with Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) ratings and Liking scores in immersive virtual indoor environments, data from 61 valid participants were analyzed. The results revealed a hierarchical neuro-affective processing structure: morphology dominated early cognitive processing, where curved geometries acted as a pre-attentive cognitive buffer, acting as a cognitive buffer by significantly attenuating the early-stage visual stress induced by angular, high-contrast configurations. Conversely, color combination primarily drove late-stage sustained environmental arousal, tracked by the LPP. Notably, area proportion demonstrated a significant amplification effect, significantly exacerbating pre-existing neuro-affective biases. Crucially, cross-modal triangulation revealed a selective inter-modal coupling: while sustained cortical activation (ΔLPP) significantly predicted subjective emotional arousal, early physiological buffering (ΔN200/ΔFAA) was functionally dissociated from subjective aesthetic preference (ΔLiking). This decoupling provides preliminary evidence consistent with a dual-system processing framework, suggesting that while curves may facilitate a preconscious biological safe baseline, ultimate aesthetic appreciation is likely subject to top-down cognitive over-riding. Ultimately, these findings transition indoor spatial color design from intuitive practice to evidence-based neuro-aesthetics, highlighting the critical role of morphological buffering and EEG metrics in optimizing human emotional well-being.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• doi:10.17632/bxkgxg3ng4.1, at the source; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Mendeley Data repository, https://doi.org/10.17632/bxkgxg3ng4.1.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 8 authors, 5 keywords, 2 funders, 63 references.

Cite

This paper

Dou, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Kang, M., Fan, Q., Xie, X., Sun, Y., & Li, M. (2026). Morphological Buffering in Neuro-Architecture: Interactive Effects of Color, Shape, and Area Proportion on Affective Processing. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 16(8), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081364

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag075 [code]

Cortical dynamics of icon perception: effects of concreteness and attractiveness.

Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

In common: cognitive, 3 references

[2] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6 [code]

Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: cognitive, 3 references

[3] doi:10.1111/psyp.70318

EEG Based Decoding of the Perception and Regulation of Taboo Words.

Journal: Psychophysiology

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[4] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01450-0 [code]

Attentional processing in individual anxiety: Electrocortical correlates of threat- and safety-related declarative memory formation.

Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[5] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1692628 [code]

The effects of vocal emotions and emotional context on the neural tracking of speech envelopes and listeners' vigilance states.

Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[6] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07304-y

Anxiety disorders alter cognitive-motor integration during visuomotor adaptation and retention.

Journal: Experimental brain research

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[7] doi:10.3390/s26175327 [code]

Subject Identity Confounds qEEG Emotion Recognition on DEAP and DREAMER.

Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0355737

How artists experience their own art.

Journal: PloS one

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[9] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1229 [code]

40 Hz audiovisual stimulation improves sustained attention and related brain oscillations.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: EEG, 2 references

[10] doi:10.1111/ejn.70543 [code]

Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.