OSCR

Missing Data Gap Imputation Methods in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Overview

Authors: Tobias Bergmann1, Michael Movshovich2, Yushu Shao3, Julia Ryznar4, Xue Nemoga-Stout4, Izabella Marquez4, Isuru Herath1, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi1, Nuray Vakitbilir1, Noah Silvaggio5, Rakibul Hasan1, Kevin Y Stein1,2, Hina Shaheen3, Jaewoong Moon6, Frederick A Zeiler1,6,7,8,9,10
  1. Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada; (I.H.); (A.S.S.); (N.V.); (R.H.); (K.Y.S.)
  2. Undergraduate Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada
  3. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2M8, Canada; (Y.S.); (H.S.)
  4. Undergraduate Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada; (J.R.); (X.N.-S.); (I.M.)
  5. Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada
  6. Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
  7. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
  8. Centre on Aging, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
  9. Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
  10. Pan Am Clinic Foundation, Winnipeg, MB R3M 3E4, Canada
Institutions: University of Manitoba (Canada); University of Cambridge (United Kingdom); Karolinska Institutet (Sweden); Addenbrooke's Hospital (United Kingdom); Pan Am Clinic Foundation (Canada)
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), volume 26, issue 8, article 2431
Dates: received 18 March 2026; accepted 10 April 2026; published online 15 April 2026
Type: Review · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.3390/s26082431 · PMID 42076541 · PMCID PMC13119862 · OpenAlex W7154453674
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: EEG (modality), human (organism), methods / tools (subfield)
Keywords: electroencephalogram, imputation methodologies, missing segments, gap reconstruction
MeSH: Electroencephalography*, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted*, Algorithms, Humans, Machine Learning (* major topic)
Topic: Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGS-D - 600433 - 2025, ALLRP-578524-22, Canadian Graduate Scholarship - Master's); Endowed Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) Chair in Neuroscience (NA)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 109 references in the paper

Abstract

Objective: Electroencephalogram (EEG) measures electrophysiological activity in the cerebral cortex and is broadly used across diagnostic, research, and clinical contexts. Missing data gaps are a pervasive issue in EEG signal recording, resulting from sensor failures and sensor disconnections, amongst other sources. To preserve a continuous signal describing underlying electrophysiological processes, imputation must be used to reconstruct these gaps. The aim of this review is to examine the methods that have been developed for missing data gap imputation in EEG signals. Methods: A search of five databases was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search question examined existing algorithms for imputation in EEG signals. Results: The initial search yielded 17,490 results (an update included 1913 additional results). This review includes 16 articles presenting EEG gap imputation methods. These imputation methods were characterized as (i) tensor-based, (ii) machine learning and deep learning, and (iii) model-based and classical. Conclusions: Several of these methods achieved strong effectiveness for accurately reconstructing gaps in ‘ground truth’ EEG signals; however, the limited generalizability of many of the studies due to small datasets lacking adequate participant diversity as well as methodological differences made it impossible to describe a single leading method. Further, the reliance on full recordings for segment imputation in some methods could prove prohibitive to real-time imputation. Future study is required to rectify these limitations and to properly investigate computational latency and requirements. Significance: This work provides novel insights into existing methods for EEG gap imputation, as it identifies current shortcomings in the literature and paves a way for a more generalizable solution to be achieved through future work.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are contained in the manuscript and the extraction tables provided in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S2–S4) or are publicly available at their respective data source.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 15 authors, 4 keywords, 5 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 85 references.

Cite

This paper

Bergmann, T., Movshovich, M., Shao, Y., Ryznar, J., Nemoga-Stout, X., Marquez, I., Herath, I., Sainbhi, A. S., Vakitbilir, N., Silvaggio, N., Hasan, R., Stein, K. Y., Shaheen, H., Moon, J., & Zeiler, F. A. (2026). Missing Data Gap Imputation Methods in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 26(8), 2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082431

BibTeX

@article{bergmann2026missing,
author = {Bergmann, Tobias and Movshovich, Michael and Shao, Yushu and Ryznar, Julia and Nemoga-Stout, Xue and Marquez, Izabella and Herath, Isuru and Sainbhi, Amanjyot Singh and Vakitbilir, Nuray and Silvaggio, Noah and Hasan, Rakibul and Stein, Kevin Y and Shaheen, Hina and Moon, Jaewoong and Zeiler, Frederick A},
title = {{Missing Data Gap Imputation Methods in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review}},
journal = {Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {26},
number = {8},
pages = {2431},
publisher = {Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)},
issn = {1424-8220},
doi = {10.3390/s26082431},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082431},
pmid = {42076541},
pmcid = {PMC13119862}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Bergmann, Tobias
AU - Movshovich, Michael
AU - Shao, Yushu
AU - Ryznar, Julia
AU - Nemoga-Stout, Xue
AU - Marquez, Izabella
AU - Herath, Isuru
AU - Sainbhi, Amanjyot Singh
AU - Vakitbilir, Nuray
AU - Silvaggio, Noah
AU - Hasan, Rakibul
AU - Stein, Kevin Y
AU - Shaheen, Hina
AU - Moon, Jaewoong
AU - Zeiler, Frederick A
TI - Missing Data Gap Imputation Methods in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review
T2 - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
J2 - Sensors (Basel)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/15
VL - 26
IS - 8
SP - 2431
SN - 1424-8220
PB - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
DO - 10.3390/s26082431
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082431
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.3390/s26082431",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Missing Data Gap Imputation Methods in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review",
"container-title": "Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Bergmann",
"given": "Tobias"
},
{
"family": "Movshovich",
"given": "Michael"
},
{
"family": "Shao",
"given": "Yushu"
},
{
"family": "Ryznar",
"given": "Julia"
},
{
"family": "Nemoga-Stout",
"given": "Xue"
},
{
"family": "Marquez",
"given": "Izabella"
},
{
"family": "Herath",
"given": "Isuru"
},
{
"family": "Sainbhi",
"given": "Amanjyot Singh"
},
{
"family": "Vakitbilir",
"given": "Nuray"
},
{
"family": "Silvaggio",
"given": "Noah"
},
{
"family": "Hasan",
"given": "Rakibul"
},
{
"family": "Stein",
"given": "Kevin Y"
},
{
"family": "Shaheen",
"given": "Hina"
},
{
"family": "Moon",
"given": "Jaewoong"
},
{
"family": "Zeiler",
"given": "Frederick A"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Sensors (Basel)",
"volume": "26",
"issue": "8",
"page": "2431",
"DOI": "10.3390/s26082431",
"PMID": "42076541",
"PMCID": "PMC13119862",
"ISSN": "1424-8220",
"publisher": "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082431",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
15
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-56070-y [code]
SSDLabeler: realistic semi-synthetic data generation for multi-label artifact classification in EEG.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: EEG, 6 references
[2] doi:10.1007/s10916-026-02374-5 [code]
Attention-Enhanced U-Net for Sensor-Efficient High-Density EEG Reconstruction in Wearable Brain Monitoring Systems.
Journal: Journal of medical systems
In common: methods / tools, EEG, 5 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s41597-026-07120-7 [code]
PhysioMotion Artifact: A task-driven EEG dataset with point-wise motion artifact annotations.
Journal: Scientific data
In common: methods / tools, EEG, 3 references
[4] doi:10.3390/bios16070394
Hybrid Edge-Cloud Asymmetric Analytics for Portable Multimodal BCI Biosensors.
Journal: Biosensors
In common: methods / tools, EEG, 3 references
[5] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag329
A meta-analysis of periodic and aperiodic electrophysiological features in Parkinson's disease.
Journal: Brain communications
In common: EEG, 3 references
[6] doi:10.3390/s26134045
Brain Signal for Secure EEG Biometric Authentication: A Comprehensive Survey.
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: methods / tools, EEG, 2 references
[7] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1824613 [code]
Rotation-based metric on the Riemannian manifold of SPD matrices with applications to source data selection for brain-computer interface transfer learning.
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience
In common: 3 references
[8] doi:10.3390/brainsci16080873
Evaluating Validation Strategies in Motor Imagery EEG: A Full-Cohort GAF-PLV Analysis and Matched Sensitivity Study.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: methods / tools, EEG, 2 references
[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0354510 [code]
Personalized adaptive virtual reality experience driven by electroencephalography-based pain recognition.
Journal: PloS one
In common: EEG, 2 references
[10] doi:10.3390/diagnostics16132012
Power and Phase Fusion Spectrogram with Three-Dimensional Convolution and Vision Transformer for Seizure Detection.
Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: EEG, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.