What contributes to our perception of the Shepard Tabletop Illusion?

Overview

1. Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento,Corso Bettini 31, 38068 Rovereto, TN Italy
2. School of Psychology, University of East Anglia,Norwich, UK
3. Department of Psychology, Counselling, and Therapy, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University,Melbourne, VIC Australia

Abstract

A vertical parallelogram placed next to an identical one but rotated horizontally by 90 degrees gives rise to one of the most powerful geometrical illusions: the Shepard Tabletop Illusion. In this illusion, the two parallelograms, or tabletops, are perceived as having different aspect ratios: the vertical one appears longer and thinner than the horizontal one. Although the exact mechanisms responsible for the illusion remain unclear, it is commonly understood that the brain treats the vertical tabletop as a three-dimensional object receding into the distance, and the horizontal one as an object closer in view. Here, we investigated the role of depth cues, texture, shape constancy, mental rotation, and autistic-like traits in the illusion. Using the method of adjustment, we measured susceptibility to four variants of the illusion: (i) plain parallelograms; (ii) plain tables; (iii) wood-like parallelograms; (iv) wood-like tables. We also measured participants’ shape constancy and mental rotation abilities, along with autistic-like traits. The results revealed that illusion strength increased with the inclusion of additional depth cues but decreased when wood-grain texture was added to the table configurations. Additionally, illusion strength correlated with mental rotation but not with shape constancy abilities. Also, there were instances in which illusion strength decreased with an increase in autistic-like traits. These findings demonstrate that the Shepard Tabletop Illusion cannot be explained solely by theories of depth perception. Processes related to the analysis of low-level visual features and mental rotation, as well as individual differences in autistic-like traits, seem to play a role as well.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

Code availability

The custom-made program can be made available upon request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability

The data and materials for all experiments are available upon request. None of the experiments were preregistered.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

• Publisher: n/a → Springer Science+Business Media

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 5 keywords, 12 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 59 references.

Cite

This paper

Sperandio, I., Monti, B. M., Piazza, M., Songhorabadi, S. K., Debernardis, F., Griffiths, D., & Chouinard, P. A. (2026). What contributes to our perception of the Shepard Tabletop Illusion? Attention, perception & psychophysics, 88(6), 159. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-026-03306-8

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1007/s00406-026-02317-8 [code]

The role of attention in perceptual biases in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and healthy controls.

Journal: European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience

In common: cognitive, 4 references

[2] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117262 [code]

Cerebellar acceleration of learning in an evidence-accumulation task.

Journal: Cell reports

In common: autism, cognitive, 2 references

[3] doi:10.1111/ejn.70490

Analysis of Task Demand Effects on Visual and Auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Across Autistic and Schizotypal Traits.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: autism, cognitive, 2 references

[4] doi:10.3390/brainsci16050535

Linking Auditory Brainstem Neural Stability to Parent-Reported Autistic Traits in School-Age Children.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: autism, 2 references

[5] doi:10.1007/s11571-026-10481-9

Social communication and brain network properties: cognitive predictors and modulation by autistic traits.

Journal: Cognitive neurodynamics

In common: autism, cognitive, 2 references

[6] doi:10.3390/brainsci16040413

Hippotherapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Executive Function and Electrophysiological Outcomes.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: autism, cognitive, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1111/ejn.70673

Reduced Motor Preparation and Altered EEG Signatures of Prediction in Autistic Adults.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: autism, cognitive, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-37933-w [code]

Gaze dynamics toward familiar and unfamiliar faces in prosopagnosia.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[9] doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1757213 [code]

A novel music-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback interface modulates interhemispheric connectivity and enhances mood.

Journal: Frontiers in psychiatry

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[10] doi:10.7554/elife.109901

Infants at high and low likelihood for autism show different EEG developmental trajectories in speech tracking and statistical learning.

Journal: eLife

In common: autism, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.