OSCR

Dissociating neural representations of multiple learned sensorimotor mappings

Overview

Authors: Antoine Caraballo1, Sungshin Kim1,2,3,4
  1. Department of Data Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  2. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  3. Department of Healthcare Digital Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  4. Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Journal: Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, volume 20, article 1965610
Dates: received 12 August 2026; accepted 30 September 2026; published online 15 October 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI · PMCID PMC13716789
Status: code on request (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: fMRI (modality), human (organism), systems (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics, Machine learning, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: fMRI, multivariate pattern analysis, posterior parietal cortex, sensorimotor mappings, visuomotor adaptation, visuomotor components
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 53 references in the paper

Abstract

Introduction: Previous behavioral studies demonstrate that humans can simultaneously learn to adapt to multiple conflicting rules for how our physical movements are related to the sensory feedback we receive from our environment (sensorimotor mappings). The preparation of movement (motor planning), rather than the physical movement itself (motor execution), has been shown to play a crucial role in keeping these conflicting rules distinct in our memory. However, it remains unclear how the human brain represents distinct planning and execution processes for multiple sensorimotor mappings.

Methods: To address this, we designed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment to dissociate planning from execution during the learning of multiple visuomotor mappings. Crucially, our design compared brain activity when participants planned for different visual outcomes. Specifically, participants simultaneously adapted to opposite rotational perturbations (+30° and −30°) during a visuomotor task but ultimately executed the exact same physical movement.

Results: Our univariate results demonstrate that the BOLD activity increases in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) during rotational planning, supporting its involvement in processing learned sensorimotor mappings. However, using multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to decode neural patterns, we found a dissociation between motor execution and rotational planning. Although the PPC and cerebellum showed distinct decodable neural patterns for opposing motor execution, we did not observe significant decoding for opposing rotational planning.

Discussion: This suggests that the PPC may not represent opposing motor plans as distinct, though we cannot rule out a lack of robust decoding power due to our low trial count.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. All MRI data used in this study are archived in the Hanyang University Network Attached Storage (NAS). Upon reasonable request, the corresponding author can provide all the dataset and code related to this study.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 October 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 2 authors, 6 keywords, 49 references.

Cite

This paper

Caraballo, A., & Kim, S. (2026). Dissociating neural representations of multiple learned sensorimotor mappings. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 20, 1965610.

BibTeX

@article{caraballo2026dissociating,
author = {Caraballo, Antoine and Kim, Sungshin},
title = {{Dissociating neural representations of multiple learned sensorimotor mappings}},
journal = {Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
volume = {20},
pages = {1965610},
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA},
issn = {1662-5153},
pmcid = {PMC13716789}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Caraballo, Antoine
AU - Kim, Sungshin
TI - Dissociating neural representations of multiple learned sensorimotor mappings
T2 - Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
J2 - Front Behav Neurosci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
VL - 20
SP - 1965610
SN - 1662-5153
PB - Frontiers Media SA
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "pmcid:PMC13716789",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Dissociating neural representations of multiple learned sensorimotor mappings",
"container-title": "Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience",
"author": [
{
"family": "Caraballo",
"given": "Antoine"
},
{
"family": "Kim",
"given": "Sungshin"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Front Behav Neurosci",
"volume": "20",
"page": "1965610",
"PMCID": "PMC13716789",
"ISSN": "1662-5153",
"publisher": "Frontiers Media SA",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
10,
30
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002934 [code]
Distinct patterns of connectivity with the motor cortex reflect different components of sensorimotor learning.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: systems, 9 references
[2] doi:10.1073/pnas.2411459121
The cerebellum acts as the analog to the medial temporal lobe for sensorimotor memory.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: systems, 8 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54738-5 [code]
A neural implementation model of feedback-based motor learning.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: systems, 6 references
[4] doi:10.1007/s00429-025-03013-4
Savings in visuomotor learning are associated with connectivity changes within a cerebello-thalamo-cortical network encoding movement errors.
Journal: Brain structure & function
In common: fMRI, 6 references
[5] doi:10.1073/pnas.2209960119 [code]
Distinct patterns of cortical manifold expansion and contraction underlie human sensorimotor adaptation.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: fMRI, systems, 5 references
[6] doi:10.1002/hbm.26508
Neural correlates of temporal recalibration to delayed auditory feedback of active and passive movements.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: fMRI, 6 references
[7] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003684 [code]
The retrieval of previously learned motor memories is facilitated by the reinstatement of default mode network manifold structures.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: fMRI, 6 references
[8] doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr4540 [code]
Contextual effects during sensorimotor adaptation are an emergent property of population coding in a cerebellar-inspired model.
Journal: Science advances
In common: systems, 5 references
[9] doi:10.3390/brainsci12101325 [code]
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: systems, 5 references
[10] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1221944 [code]
Neural representations for multi-context visuomotor adaptation and the impact of common representation on multi-task performance: a multivariate decoding approach.
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience
In common: systems, 4 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.