OSCR

No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.

Overview

  1. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  2. Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
  3. Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM3)—Research Center Jülich Jülich Germany
  4. Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany
Journal: Movement disorders clinical practice, article 10.1002/mdc3.70886
Dates: received 23 June 2026; accepted 15 October 2026; published online 2 November 2026; in print November 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1002/mdc3.70886 · PMID 42972941 · PMCID PMC13728422 · OpenAlex W7163370166
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Categories: human (organism), other condition (population), Parkinson's (population), clinical / translational (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics
Keywords: essential tremor, frequency, Parkinson's disease, STN, VIM/PSA
Topic: Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders (Clinical Neurology, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FI 773/15‐1, 431549029)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 43 references in the paper

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (VIM/PSA) in Essential Tremor (ET) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are established treatments for tremor. To achieve maximum tremor control, increasing stimulation frequency beyond 130 Hz is part of clinical practice, but lacks scientific evidence.

Objective: To compare tremor suppression under total electrical energy delivered (TEED)‐equivalent stimulation at 130 versus 185 Hz in VIM/PSA‐DBS for ET and STN‐DBS for PD.

Methods: In this prospective, double‐blind study, acute DBS effects were assessed in 18 people with ET (n = 29 hemispheres), and 25 people with PD (n = 30 hemispheres). Tremor‐suppressive effects, evaluated by accelerometry, were compared with TEED‐equivalent stimulation at 130 and 185 Hz using linear mixed‐effects models, explorative pairwise comparisons, and equivalency testing.

Results: Linear mixed‐effects models revealed no significant effect of stimulation frequency on tremor improvement in both cohorts. Pairwise comparisons showed no consistent differences in total tremor improvement with TEED‐equivalent 130 Hz vs 185 Hz DBS. Post‐hoc equivalence testing confirmed equivalence of stimulation frequencies under TEED‐equivalent conditions within a ±20% margin of relative tremor improvement.

Conclusion: This study provides Level II evidence that a higher stimulation frequency of 185 Hz does not offer additional benefit in deep brain stimulation for tremor in VIM/PSA for Essential Tremor or in the STN for Parkinson's Disease in the acute setting and supports 130 Hz as the standard stimulation frequency for tremor suppression.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data and to no code of its authors: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data Availability Statement

The main outcome data supporting the findings of this study are available via zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23412873 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23412873)).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 4 November 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, pages, dates, 10 authors, 5 keywords, 1 funder, 41 references.

Cite

This paper

van der Linden, C., Trapp, P., Dembek, T. A., Schedlich‐Teufer, C., Brandt, G. A., Jergas, H., Fink, G. R., Visser‐Vandewalle, V., Barbe, M. T., & Petry‐Schmelzer, J. N. (2026). No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. Movement disorders clinical practice, 10.1002/mdc3.70886. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886

BibTeX

@article{vanderlinden2026no,
author = {van der Linden, Christina and Trapp, Peer and Dembek, Till A. and Schedlich‐Teufer, Charlotte and Brandt, Gregor A. and Jergas, Hannah and Fink, Gereon R. and Visser‐Vandewalle, Veerle and Barbe, Michael T. and Petry‐Schmelzer, Jan Niklas},
title = {{No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial}},
journal = {Movement disorders clinical practice},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
pages = {10.1002/mdc3.70886},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {2330-1619},
doi = {10.1002/mdc3.70886},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886},
pmid = {42972941},
pmcid = {PMC13728422}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - van der Linden, Christina
AU - Trapp, Peer
AU - Dembek, Till A.
AU - Schedlich‐Teufer, Charlotte
AU - Brandt, Gregor A.
AU - Jergas, Hannah
AU - Fink, Gereon R.
AU - Visser‐Vandewalle, Veerle
AU - Barbe, Michael T.
AU - Petry‐Schmelzer, Jan Niklas
TI - No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial
T2 - Movement disorders clinical practice
J2 - Mov Disord Clin Pract
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/02
SP - 10.1002/mdc3.70886
SN - 2330-1619
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1002/mdc3.70886
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1002/mdc3.70886",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial",
"container-title": "Movement disorders clinical practice",
"author": [
{
"family": "van der Linden",
"given": "Christina"
},
{
"family": "Trapp",
"given": "Peer"
},
{
"family": "Dembek",
"given": "Till A."
},
{
"family": "Schedlich‐Teufer",
"given": "Charlotte"
},
{
"family": "Brandt",
"given": "Gregor A."
},
{
"family": "Jergas",
"given": "Hannah"
},
{
"family": "Fink",
"given": "Gereon R."
},
{
"family": "Visser‐Vandewalle",
"given": "Veerle"
},
{
"family": "Barbe",
"given": "Michael T."
},
{
"family": "Petry‐Schmelzer",
"given": "Jan Niklas"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Mov Disord Clin Pract",
"page": "10.1002/mdc3.70886",
"DOI": "10.1002/mdc3.70886",
"PMID": "42972941",
"PMCID": "PMC13728422",
"ISSN": "2330-1619",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
11,
2
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3390/s23208621 [code]
Accelerometric Classification of Resting and Postural Tremor Amplitude.
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: Parkinson's, other condition, 3 references, 6 authors
[2] doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55242-6 [code]
A critical role of action-related functional networks in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: other condition, 5 authors
[3] doi:10.1002/ana.78206 [code]
Multimodal Image Guidance in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.
Journal: Annals of neurology
In common: Parkinson's, clinical / translational, 3 references, 3 authors
[4] doi:10.1038/s41531-024-00701-6 [code]
Predictors of short-term anxiety outcome in subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease.
Journal: NPJ Parkinson's disease
In common: Parkinson's, clinical / translational, other condition, 3 authors
[5] doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01570-1 [code]
Mapping dysfunctional circuits in the frontal cortex using deep brain stimulation.
Journal: Nature neuroscience
In common: Parkinson's, other condition, 1 reference, 2 authors
[6] doi:10.64898/2026.02.21.26346772 [code]
Optimal Deep Brain Stimulation Locations for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome
Journal: medRxiv (preprint)
In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference, 2 authors
[7] doi:10.3390/brainsci12121726 [code]
Local Field Potential-Guided Contact Selection Using Chronically Implanted Sensing Devices for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: Parkinson's, 1 reference, 2 authors
[8] doi:10.1159/000546716
Structural Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia from Patient-Individual Tractography Is Key for Understanding the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.
Journal: Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery
In common: Parkinson's, clinical / translational, 2 authors
[9] doi:10.1038/s41531-025-01177-8 [code]
Bradykinesia induced by pallidal neurostimulation in dystonia: clinical risk factors and anatomical mapping.
Journal: NPJ Parkinson's disease
In common: Parkinson's, clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference, author Gregor A. Brandt
[10] doi:10.1002/hbm.70207 [code]
Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation: Mapping Non-Motor Outcomes to Structural Connections.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: Parkinson's, clinical / translational, 1 reference, author Michael T. Barbe

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.