Visual Word Form Area demonstrates individual and task-agnostic consistency but inter-individual variability.
The 5 matches
- [1] § Methods › Functional regions of interest ↔ extract_ROI_PSC.ipynb, lines 129–139 · score 0.69 · kFFA, rFFA, kVWFA, rVWFA, template ROIs, FFAs
- [2] § Methods › Functional regions of interest ↔ freeview_label_screenshots.ipynb, lines 196–218 · score 0.69 · kFFA, rFFA, kVWFA, rVWFA, template ROIs, FFAs
- [3] § Methods › Functional regions of interest ↔ plotting.ipynb, lines 201–235 · score 0.67 · aFFA, cFFA, aVWFA, cVWFA, ROI
- [4] § Methods › Functional regions of interest ↔ extract_ROI_PSC.ipynb, lines 129–139 · score 0.67 · aFFA, cFFA, aVWFA, cVWFA, map, ROI
- [5] § Results › Group and template VWFAs obscure text-selective results due to individual differences ↔ plotting.ipynb, lines 201–235 · score 0.65 · aVWFA, cVWFA, kVWFA, rVWFA, pseudofonts, limbs
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Jupyter notebook · 178 lines · 5.2 KB · MIT · 2 matches
- # %% [markdown]
- # # Set up
- # %%
- #import packages
- import pandas as pd
- from nilearn import surface
- import numpy as np
- import os
- import glob
- import usefulFunctions as uf
- # %%
- # flag to save csv
- save_csv = True
- #set paths
- base_dir = f'{os.path.dirname(os.getcwd())}/'
- roi_dir = f'{base_dir}data/labels/'
- psc_dir = f'{base_dir}data/psc_maps/'
- csv_dir = f'{base_dir}analysis/CSVs/'
- #define variable list
- subs = uf.subject_list(f'{psc_dir}native/allData/')
- ROIs = ['VWFA','FFA']
- spaces = ['native','average']
- data_types = ['allData','sepTask']
- categories = ['T','FF','F','O','L','noText']
- map_tasks = ['oneback','fixation']
- roi_tasks = ['oneback','fixation']
- # %% [markdown]
- # # allData ROIs
- # %%
- # Collect all data
- data_records = []
- # loop through subs, rois, spaces, and categories to extract mean psc
- for sub in subs:
- for roi in ROIs:
- for space in spaces:
- # check in an roi exists
- ROI_paths = glob.glob(f'{roi_dir}{space}/allData/{sub}/{sub}_*-v-ALL_{roi}*_LH.label')
- if len(ROI_paths)>0:
- # load roi lable
- roi_indices = uf.read_in_rois(ROI_paths)
- for category in categories:
- #load psc map
- psc_map = surface.load_surf_data(f'{psc_dir}{space}/allData/{sub}/{sub}_{category}_LH.curv')
- # calculate mean psc for each existing roi
- if psc_map is not None:
- mean_psc = np.mean(psc_map[roi_indices])
- else: # assign nan if roi doesn't exist
- mean_psc = np.nan
- # Store the results
- data_records.append({
- 'sub': sub,
- 'roi': roi,
- 'space': space,
- 'category': category,
- 'mean_psc': mean_psc
- })
- # Create DataFrame
- df = pd.DataFrame(data_records)
- # save df as csv
- df_path = f'{csv_dir}allDataROIs_allDataMaps_meanPSC.csv'
- if save_csv:
- df.to_csv(df_path, index=False)
- # %% [markdown]
- # # sepTask ROIs
- # %%
- # Collect all data
- data_records = []
- # loop through subs, rois, spaces, task, and categories to extract mean psc
- for sub in subs:
- for roi in ROIs:
- for space in spaces:
- for roi_task in roi_tasks:
- # check in an roi exists
- ROI_paths = glob.glob(f'{roi_dir}{space}/sepTask/{sub}/{sub}_task-{roi_task}_*-v-ALL_{roi}*_LH.label')
- if len(ROI_paths)>0:
- # load roi lable
- roi_indices = uf.read_in_rois(ROI_paths)
- for category in categories:
- for map_task in map_tasks:
- #load psc map
- psc_map = surface.load_surf_data(f'{psc_dir}{space}/sepTask/{sub}/{sub}_task-{map_task}_{category}_LH.curv')
- # calculate mean psc for each existing roi
- if psc_map is not None:
- mean_psc = np.mean(psc_map[roi_indices])
- else: # assign nan if roi doesn't exist
- mean_psc = np.nan
- # Store the results
- data_records.append({
- 'sub': sub,
- 'roi': roi,
- 'space': space,
- 'roi_task': roi_task,
- 'category': category,
- 'map_task': map_task,
- 'mean_psc': mean_psc
- })
- # Create DataFrame
- df = pd.DataFrame(data_records)
- # save df as csv
- df_path = f'{csv_dir}sepTaskROIs_sepTaskMaps_meanPSC.csv'
- if save_csv:
- df.to_csv(df_path, index=False)
- # %% [markdown]
- # # Group/Template ROIs
- # %%
- # set directory
- roi_dir = f'{base_dir}data/labels/group_labels/'
- psc_dir = f'{base_dir}data/psc_maps/average/allData/'
- # define variables
- categories = ['T','FF','F','O','L','noText']
- ROIs = ['aVWFA','cVWFA','kVWFA','rVWFA','aFFA','cFFA','kFFA','rFFA']
- # %%
- # Collect all data
- data_records = []
- # loop through subs, rois, and categories to extract mean psc
- for roi in ROIs:
- # load the ROI
- roi_indices = uf.read_in_rois(glob.glob(f'{roi_dir}{roi}*_LH.label'))
- for sub in subs:
- for category in categories:
- #load psc map
- psc_map = surface.load_surf_data(f'{psc_dir}{sub}/{sub}_{category}_LH.curv')
- # calculate mean psc for each existing roi
- if psc_map is not None:
- mean_psc = np.mean(psc_map[roi_indices])
- else: # assign nan if roi doesn't exist
- mean_psc = np.nan
- # Store the results
- data_records.append({
- 'sub': sub,
- 'roi': roi,
- 'category': category,
- 'mean_psc': mean_psc
- })
- # Create DataFrame
- df = pd.DataFrame(data_records)
- # save df as csv
- df_path = f'{csv_dir}groupROIs_allDataMaps_meanPSC.csv'
- if save_csv:
- df.to_csv(df_path, index=False)
extract_ROI_PSC.ipynb at commit d2dd277, under MIT · at the source
Overview
- Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Baraba, CA, USA
- Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics,Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
Abstract
The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 5 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
jamielmitchell/Mitchell_DCN2026
d2dd277917d8924a11ea2920b44e1e2bec52818c, 3 March 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 30 September 2026: the link answers
- 30 September 2026: the link answers
11 files
- LMEs.Rmd, R, 149 lines
- ROI_overlap.ipynb, Jupyter, 196 lines
- extract_ROI_PSC.ipynb, Jupyter, 178 lines, 2 matches
- freeview_label_screensho
ts.ipynb , Jupyter, 241 lines, 1 match - group_ROI_differences.ip
ynb , Jupyter, 66 lines - plotting.ipynb, Jupyter, 281 lines, 2 matches
- second_level_analysis.ip
ynb , Jupyter, 149 lines - sepTask_VWFA_similarity.
ipynb , Jupyter, 174 lines - usefulFunctions.py, Python, 43 lines
- LICENSE, License, 21 lines
- README.md, Text, 23 lines
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 9 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 5 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Code and data availability statement
The paper has a code and data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to the authors' code: jamielmitchell/
Mitchell_DCN2026
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101703.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 5 authors, 6 keywords, 15 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 48 references.
Cite
This paper
Mitchell, J. L., Jimenez, M., Stone, H. L., Yablonski, M., & Yeatman, J. D. (2026). Visual Word Form Area demonstrates individual and task-agnostic consistency but inter-individual variability. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 79, 101703. https://
BibTeX
@article{mitchell2026vis
author = {Mitchell, Jamie L. and Jimenez, Mia and Stone, Hannah L. and Yablonski, Maya and Yeatman, Jason D.},
title = {{Visual Word Form Area demonstrates individual and task-agnostic consistency but inter-individual variability}},
journal = {Developmental cognitive neuroscience},
year = {2026},
month = mar,
volume = {79},
pages = {101703},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {1878-9293},
doi = {10.1016/
url = {https://
pmid = {41791266},
pmcid = {PMC12993163}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Mitchell, Jamie L.
AU - Jimenez, Mia
AU - Stone, Hannah L.
AU - Yablonski, Maya
AU - Yeatman, Jason D.
TI - Visual Word Form Area demonstrates individual and task-agnostic consistency but inter-individual variability
T2 - Developmental cognitive neuroscience
J2 - Dev Cogn Neurosci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 79
SP - 101703
SN - 1878-9293
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1016/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Visual Word Form Area demonstrates individual and task-agnostic consistency but inter-individual variability",
"container-title": "Developmental cognitive neuroscience",
"author": [
{
"family": "Mitchell",
"given": "Jamie L."
},
{
"family": "Jimenez",
"given": "Mia"
},
{
"family": "Stone",
"given": "Hannah L."
},
{
"family": "Yablonski",
"given": "Maya"
},
{
"family": "Yeatman",
"given": "Jason D."
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "79",
"page": "101703",
"DOI": "10.1016/
"PMID": "41791266",
"PMCID": "PMC12993163",
"ISSN": "1878-9293",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
3,
3
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101765 [code]
- Fusiform face area development correlates with development in higher-order social brain regions.Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscienceIn common: FreeSurfer, lmerTest, Nilearn, 7 other tools, fMRI, 5 references
- [2] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0038-26.2026 [code]
- Multidimensional Feature Tuning in Category Selective Areas of Human Visual Cortex.Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for NeuroscienceIn common: NiBabel, seaborn, pandas, 3 other tools, fMRI, 6 references
- [3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76098-y [code]
- A single computational objective can produce specialization of streams in visual cortex.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: FreeSurfer, NiBabel, seaborn, 4 other tools, 5 references
- [4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1347 [code]
- Neural and behavioural correlates of theory of mind reasoning in five-year-old children born preterm.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: FreeSurfer, lmerTest, Nilearn, 7 other tools, fMRI, 1 reference
- [5] doi:10.1073/pnas.2602515123 [code]
- Initial organization and progressive expansion of the math-responsive brain network during the first school years.Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaIn common: Nilearn, pandas, SciPy, 2 other tools, fMRI, 5 references
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71428-6 [code]
- Binding items to contexts through conjunctive neural representations with the method of loci.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: lmerTest, Nilearn, lme4, 7 other tools, 2 references
- [7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.105 [code]
- Right posterior theta reflects human parahippocampal phase resetting by salient cues during goal-directed navigationJournal: n/aIn common: lmerTest, Nilearn, lme4, 7 other tools, fMRI, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41597-026-07377-y [code]
- An open-access multi-site fMRI dataset for investigating conscious visual perception.Journal: Scientific dataIn common: FreeSurfer, lmerTest, Nilearn, 7 other tools, fMRI, 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1245 [code]
- Towards precision EEG connectomics: Evaluating the benefits of dense sampling.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: FreeSurfer, lmerTest, Nilearn, 8 other tools
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76452-0 [code]
- Music evokes shared neural representations of imagined narratives across sensory modalities.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: FreeSurfer, Nilearn, NiBabel, 5 other tools, 3 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 9 scripts, and 5 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:c75badd2f68d46e7…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
