OSCR

Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network.

Overview

Authors: Minchul Kim1, Yae Ji Kim2, Marvin M Chun3,4,5, Kwangsun Yoo2,6,7
  1. Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  2. Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  3. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
  4. Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
  5. Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  6. AI Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  7. Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Republic of Korea
Institutions: Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (South Korea); Sungkyunkwan University (South Korea); Yale University (United States); Samsung Medical Center (South Korea); Institute for Basic Science (South Korea); Research Institute for Future Medicine (South Korea)
Journal: NeuroImage, volume 330, article 121862
Dates: published online 13 March 2026; in print 15 April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862 · PMID 41833887 · PMCID PMC13035313 · OpenAlex W7135206150
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request
Categories: structural MRI / diffusion (modality), human (organism), methods / tools (subfield)
Methods: Statistics, Machine learning, Preprocessing, Connectivity, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: Volumetric similarity network (VSN), Structural MRI, Connectome fingerprinting, Brain network
MeSH: Attention*, Brain*, Connectome*, Magnetic Resonance Imaging*, Nerve Net*, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: NIMH NIH HHS (R01 MH108591)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 31 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Code and data availability statement

The paper has a code and data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

  • it says that the data are available on request
  • it says that the code is available on request

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 4 authors, 4 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 26 references.

Cite

This paper

Kim, M., Kim, Y. J., Chun, M. M., & Yoo, K. (2026). Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network. NeuroImage, 330, 121862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862

BibTeX

@article{kim2026biological,
author = {Kim, Minchul and Kim, Yae Ji and Chun, Marvin M and Yoo, Kwangsun},
title = {{Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network}},
journal = {NeuroImage},
year = {2026},
month = mar,
volume = {330},
pages = {121862},
publisher = {Elsevier BV},
issn = {1053-8119},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862},
pmid = {41833887},
pmcid = {PMC13035313}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Minchul
AU - Kim, Yae Ji
AU - Chun, Marvin M
AU - Yoo, Kwangsun
TI - Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network
T2 - NeuroImage
J2 - Neuroimage
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/13
VL - 330
SP - 121862
SN - 1053-8119
PB - Elsevier BV
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network",
"container-title": "NeuroImage",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kim",
"given": "Minchul"
},
{
"family": "Kim",
"given": "Yae Ji"
},
{
"family": "Chun",
"given": "Marvin M"
},
{
"family": "Yoo",
"given": "Kwangsun"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Neuroimage",
"volume": "330",
"page": "121862",
"DOI": "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862",
"PMID": "41833887",
"PMCID": "PMC13035313",
"ISSN": "1053-8119",
"publisher": "Elsevier BV",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121862",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
3,
13
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1162/netn.a.553 [code]
MIND versus MSN: A systematic evaluation of test-retest reliability and age sensitivity for T1-weighted structural similarity networks.
Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 7 references
[2] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10237-5 [code]
Shared subcortical-default mode morphological dysconnectivity in adolescent bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: 7 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s44220-026-00623-7 [code]
Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.
Journal: Nature. Mental health
In common: 7 references
[4] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0370-25.2026 [code]
Pretraining for Large-Scale Functional Connectome Fingerprinting Supports Generalization and Transfer Learning in Functional Neuroimaging.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: methods / tools, 6 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10276-y [code]
The cellular correlates and adolescent reorganisation of cortical myelination networks in the common marmoset.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 5 references
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73714-9 [code]
The genetic architecture of cortical similarity networks.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
[7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1322 [code]
Fine-scale individualized gyral folding-based cortical similarity networks reveal distinct organizational patterns in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
[8] doi:10.1002/gps3.70014 [code]
Correspondence between morphological similarity of the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex and neurotransmitter systems in adolescent males with autism.
Journal: General psychiatry
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
[9] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74953-6 [code]
In-scanner thoughts contribute to resting-state functional connectivity.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 4 references
[10] doi:10.1002/brb3.71363
Brain Functional Connectivity as a Mediator Between Hematological Metrics and Cognitive Decline in Children With Beta-thalassemia Major.
Journal: Brain and behavior
In common: 4 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.