Assistive algorithms influence neural representations in motor brain-computer interfaces.
The 11 matches · 1 of them tie a paragraph to a whole file without given lines: a weak match, whose lines are not tinted
- [1] § Methods › Data analysis › Rank-ordered neuron adding curve ↔ neural_data_analysis/compactness.ipynb, lines 142 to 234 · score 0.85 · normalized prediction accuracy, early days, ranked units, Adding Curve, late days, scores · Report a mismatch
- [2] § Methods › Model › Arm model ↔ model/src/TorqueBasedArm.cpp, lines 88 to 124 · score 0.83 · end effector acceleration, friction matrix, end effector velocity, end effector position, inertia, torques · Report a mismatch
- [3] § Results › Credit assignment to readout units during long-term learning with adaptive decoders ↔ neural_data_analysis/credit_assignment.ipynb, lines 141 to 207 · score 0.67 · cross validation, logistic regression, credit assignment, predict, accuracies, neural · Report a mismatch
- [4] § Methods › Data analysis › Logistic regression model ↔ neural_data_analysis/compactness.ipynb, lines 142 to 234 · score 0.65 · max iters, late days, L2, Logistic, regression, accuracy · Report a mismatch
- [5] § Methods › Experiment › BCI control with adaptive decoders ↔ model/params/bci-model-clda0.5/copy_sim_bci_model.cpp, lines 1 to 14 · score 0.62 · closed loop decoder, velocity Kalman filter, KF, BCI, adaptation, trained · Report a mismatch
- [6] § Methods › Experiment › BCI control with adaptive decoders ↔ model/params/bci_model1/copy_sim_bci_model.cpp, lines 1 to 14 · score 0.62 · closed loop decoder, velocity Kalman filter, KF, BCI, adaptation, trained · Report a mismatch
- [7] § Methods › Model › Analysis of the model ↔ model/analysis/plot_weight_change.py, lines 102 to 175 · score 0.60 · weight change, recurrent weight, linregress, scatter, fixed decoder, seed · Report a mismatch
- [8] § Methods › Data analysis › Logistic regression model ↔ neural_data_analysis/credit_assignment.ipynb, lines 141 to 207 · score 0.59 · logistic regression, flattened, scored, splits, predict, accuracy · Report a mismatch
- [9] § Methods › Experiment › BCI control with adaptive decoders ↔ model/params/bci-model-clda0.5/copy_sim_bci_model.cpp, lines 1 to 14 · score 0.54 · unit swaps, closed loop, KF, BCI, loss, decoder · Report a mismatch
- [10] § Methods › Experiment › BCI control with adaptive decoders ↔ model/params/bci_model1/copy_sim_bci_model.cpp, lines 1 to 14 · score 0.54 · unit swaps, closed loop, KF, BCI, loss, decoder · Report a mismatch
- [11] § Methods › Model › Network model ↔ model/params/arm_model/copy_sim_arm_model.cpp, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.54 · activation function, weight matrix, membrane, ReLU, recurrent, RNN · Report a mismatch
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser; OSCR does not store it: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Jupyter notebook · 289 lines · 11 KB · no license · 2 matches
- # %%
- import os
- import numpy as np
- import pickle
- from tqdm import tqdm
- import pandas as pd
- import seaborn as sns
- import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
- import copy
- from sklearn.utils import resample, shuffle
- from sklearn.model_selection import PredefinedSplit
- from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
- from sklearn.model_selection import PredefinedSplit
- from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
- from sklearn import model_selection
- from sklearn import linear_model
- # %%
- # functions
- ###### helper functions #######
- def pkl_read(file_to_read, write_dir):
- this = pickle.load(open(os.path.join(write_dir,file_to_read), "rb"))
- # print(this)
- return this
- def pkl_write(file_to_write, values_to_dump, write_dir):
- os.chdir(write_dir)
- with open(os.path.join(write_dir,file_to_write), 'wb') as pickle_file:
- pickle.dump(values_to_dump, pickle_file)
- def getdata_day(data,id,data_day):
- if id == 1:
- # var_name = data[0:data_day[id]+1,:,:]
- var_name = data[0:data_day[id],:,:]
- else:
- day_idx = np.where(np.array(list(data_day))== id)[0].astype(int) - 1
- #print(day_idx[0])
- prev_day_id = list(data_day)[day_idx[0]]
- #print(prev_day_id)
- var_name = data[data_day[prev_day_id]:data_day[id],:,:]
- return var_name
- def gettarget_day(target_direction, id, day):
- if id == 1:
- target = target_direction[:day[id]]
- else:
- day_idx = np.where(np.array(list(day))== id)[0].astype(int) - 1
- #print(day_idx[0])
- prev_day_id = list(day)[day_idx[0]]
- target = target_direction[day[prev_day_id]:day[id]]
- return target
- def get_numtrials_perday(datasize_day):
- '''
- datasize_day: dictionary with key as day and value as end trial index for that day . Comes from getdata_day()
- '''
- num_trials_perday = np.zeros(len(datasize_day))
- num_trials_perday[0] = np.array(list(datasize_day.values()))[0]
- num_trials_perday[1:] = np.diff(np.array(list(datasize_day.values())))
- # print(num_trials_perday)
- return num_trials_perday
- def trial_concatenate_data(data):
- '''
- data is on shape n_trials x n_units x n_bins
- '''
- n,u,t = data.shape
- new_arr = np.transpose(data, (0,2,1))
- new_arr = new_arr.reshape(n*t, u)
- # print(new_arr.shape)
- return new_arr
- ###### LR analysis functions #########
- def get_equal_target_dist_predefinedsplit(idx, target, n_samples_per_target):
- random_idx = []
- for it in range(8):
- this_idx = np.where(target== it+1)
- r_idx = np.random.choice(this_idx[0], n_samples_per_target, replace = False)
- # print(r_idx)
- random_idx.append(r_idx)
- # print(np.shape(random_idx))
- rand_idx = np.array(random_idx).reshape(n_samples_per_target*8)
- ps = np.zeros(len(target))
- ps[rand_idx] = -1 # index for training
- # ps[ps == 0] = 1 # index for test set
- # to genereate 2 fold cross validation
- test_idx = np.argwhere(~np.in1d(np.arange(len(ps)), rand_idx))
- first_fold = test_idx[:len(test_idx)//2]
- second_fold = test_idx[len(test_idx)//2:]
- ps[first_fold] = 0 # index for test set for fold 1
- ps[second_fold] = 1 # index for test set for fold 2
- # print(ps[ps == -1].shape, ps[ps == 0].shape, ps[ps == 1].shape)
- return ps
- def flatten_data(data):
- # Flattens the last two dimensions of the data
- return data.reshape(data.shape[0], -1)
- def matrix_similarity(A, B):
- """
- Compute the R^2 similarity between two matrices by treating them as vectors.
- Args:
- - A: First 2D matrix.
- - B: Second 2D matrix.
- Returns:
- - R^2 value representing the similarity between the matrices.
- """
- assert A.shape == B.shape, "Matrices must have the same shape"
- # Flatten the matrices to vectors
- A_flat = A.ravel()
- B_flat = B.ravel()
- # Compute the correlation coefficient
- correlation_matrix = np.corrcoef(A_flat, B_flat)
- r = correlation_matrix[0, 1]
- # Square the correlation coefficient to get R^2 value
- r2 = r #**2
- return r2
- # %%
- neural_recordings = pkl_read('neural_data.pkl', './example_data/') # Shape: n_tr x n_units x n_timebins; top 16 units are readouts
- target_direction = pkl_read('target_labels.pkl', './example_data/')
- datasize_day = pkl_read('trial_day_label.pkl', './example_data/')
- days = np.arange(2,18) # just for example. In the paper, we considered all days that had a minimum of 25 trials of successful reaches per target direction, minimum 200 trials in total.
- n_readouts = 20
- # %%
- # ranked unit adding curve with readout units only
- early_day = days[1]
- late_day = days[-1]
- n_neurons = n_readouts
- neural_recordings = neural_recordings[:,:n_readouts, :]
- # 2) Load neural data belonging to the days we want to check
- days_to_check = (early_day, late_day)
- n_bs = 10 # 100
- accuracy_inc_days_bs = np.zeros((len(days_to_check), n_bs, n_neurons)) # Individual unit accuracy : n_days x n_bs x n_sortedunits
- n_cont_idx_days_bs = np.zeros((len(days_to_check), n_bs, n_neurons))
- accuracy_ndc_days_bs = np.zeros((len(days_to_check), n_bs, n_neurons)) # Accuracy from ranked unit adding
- for i_, i in enumerate(days_to_check):
- data = getdata_day(neural_recordings,i, datasize_day )
- target = gettarget_day(target_direction, i, datasize_day)
- for j in tqdm(range(n_bs)):
- # Bootstrap trails with equal distribution of all targets and define train-test set
- idx = np.arange(0,len(data),1)
- test_fold = get_equal_target_dist_predefinedsplit(idx,target, 25) # function that returns 200 random trials ids with equal distribution of target directions in the dataset
- ps = PredefinedSplit(test_fold)
- # Get prediction accuracy for each neuron
- accuracy_inc = []
- for iN in range(n_neurons):
- sample_data = data[:,iN,:]
- data_train = np.squeeze(sample_data)
- data_flat = flatten_data(data_train)
- outcome_train = np.squeeze(target)
- # Logistic Regression Model
- my_model = linear_model.LogisticRegression(penalty = 'l2', max_iter=1000, C = 1)
- # Creating a pipeline
- pipe = Pipeline([
- ('scale', StandardScaler()),
- ('logistic', my_model)
- ])
- cv_results = model_selection.cross_validate(pipe, data_flat, outcome_train, cv= ps, return_estimator=True)
- results = cv_results['test_score']
- accuracy_inc.append(results)
- # print('inc')
- inc_mean = np.mean(accuracy_inc,1) # mean across 2 fold
- # print(inc_mean.shape)
- n_idx = np.argsort(inc_mean)[::-1] # sort units based on individual unit accuracy
- # print(n_idx)
- accuracy_inc_days_bs[i_, j, :] = inc_mean[n_idx] # days_to_check x n_bs x n_units
- n_cont_idx_days_bs[i_,j, :] = n_idx
- # Run unit adding curve based on rank from above
- for iN in range(1,n_neurons+1):
- neuron_idx = n_idx[:iN]
- sample_data = data[:,neuron_idx,:]
- data_train = np.squeeze(sample_data)
- data_flat = flatten_data(data_train) # Concatenating the third dimension
- outcome_train = np.squeeze(target)
- # Logistic Regression Model
- my_model = linear_model.LogisticRegression(penalty = 'l2', max_iter=1000, C = 1)
- # Creating a pipeline
- pipe = Pipeline([
- ('scale', StandardScaler()),
- ('logistic', my_model)
- ])
- #cross validate coef
- cv_results = model_selection.cross_validate(pipe, data_flat, outcome_train, cv= ps, return_estimator=True)
- # accuracy_draw[id] = cv_results['test_score']
- results = cv_results['test_score']
- accuracy_ndc_days_bs[i_,j,iN-1] = np.mean(results)
- acc_early = accuracy_ndc_days_bs[0,:,:]
- m_a_early = np.mean(acc_early,axis = 0) # mean along bootstrap
- norm_acc_early =( m_a_early - np.min(m_a_early)) /(np.max(m_a_early)- np.min(m_a_early))
- print(acc_early.shape)
- acc_late = accuracy_ndc_days_bs[1,:,:]
- m_a_late = np.mean(acc_late,axis = 0)
- norm_acc_late =( m_a_late - np.min(m_a_late)) / (np.max(m_a_late)- np.min(m_a_late))
- print(acc_late.shape)
- compactness_early = np.argwhere(norm_acc_early > 0.8)[0][0]
- compactness_late = np.argwhere(norm_acc_late > 0.8)[0][0]
- print(f'No. of units to reach 80% normalized prediction during early day is {compactness_early} and late day is {compactness_late}')
- # %%
- print(accuracy_inc_days_bs.shape) # n_days x n_bs x n_rankedunits
- sns.set_context('paper')
- sns.set_style('ticks')
- plt.figure(figsize=(2.2,1.5))
- plt.errorbar(np.arange(n_neurons)+1,np.mean(accuracy_inc_days_bs[0,:,:], axis = 0), yerr = np.std(accuracy_inc_days_bs[0,:,:], axis = 0), color = 'tab:cyan', label = 'early', linewidth = 1.0)
- plt.errorbar(np.arange(n_neurons)+1,np.mean(accuracy_inc_days_bs[1,:,:], axis = 0), yerr = np.std(accuracy_inc_days_bs[1,:,:], axis = 0), color = 'tab:purple', label = 'late', linewidth = 1.0)
- plt.ylabel('Classification accuracy', fontsize = 8)
- plt.xlabel('Ranked units', fontsize = 8)
- plt.legend(frameon = False, labelcolor = 'linecolor')
- plt.xticks(fontsize = 8)
- plt.yticks(fontsize = 8)
- sns.despine()
- plt.figure(figsize=(2.2,1.5))
- sns.set_context('paper')
- sns.set_style('ticks')
- plt.errorbar(np.arange(n_neurons)+1,np.mean(accuracy_ndc_days_bs[0,:,:], axis = 0), yerr = np.std(accuracy_ndc_days_bs[0,:,:], axis = 0), color = 'tab:cyan', label = 'early', linewidth = 1.0)
- plt.errorbar(np.arange(n_neurons)+1,np.mean(accuracy_ndc_days_bs[1,:,:], axis = 0), yerr = np.std(accuracy_ndc_days_bs[1,:,:], axis = 0), color = 'tab:purple', label = 'late', linewidth = 1.0)
- plt.ylabel('Classification accuracy', fontsize = 8)
- plt.xlabel('# of ranked units', fontsize = 8)
- plt.legend(frameon = False, labelcolor = 'linecolor', fontsize = 8)
- plt.xticks(fontsize = 8)
- plt.yticks(fontsize = 8)
- sns.despine()
- # f_name = os.path.join(PLOTS_DIR, 'RankOrderedNDC_all_paper.pdf')
- # plt.savefig(f_name, dpi = 300)
- # Normalizing to align
- sns.set_context('paper')
- sns.set_style('ticks')
- plt.figure(figsize=(2.2, 1.5))
- acc_early = accuracy_ndc_days_bs[0,:,:]
- m_a_early = np.mean(acc_early,axis = 0) # mean along bootstrap
- norm_acc_early =( m_a_early - np.min(m_a_early)) /(np.max(m_a_early)- np.min(m_a_early))
- print(acc_early.shape)
- acc_late = accuracy_ndc_days_bs[1,:,:]
- m_a_late = np.mean(acc_late,axis = 0)
- norm_acc_late =( m_a_late - np.min(m_a_late)) / (np.max(m_a_late)- np.min(m_a_late))
- print(acc_late.shape)
- plt.errorbar(np.arange(n_neurons)+1, norm_acc_early, yerr=np.std(acc_early,axis =0) ,color = 'tab:cyan', label = 'early')
- plt.errorbar(np.arange(n_neurons)+1, norm_acc_late, yerr=np.std(acc_late,axis =0), color = 'tab:purple', label = 'late')
- plt.axhline(y = 0.8, color = 'k', alpha = 0.8, linestyle = '-.')
- plt.legend(frameon = False, labelcolor = 'linecolor')
- plt.xlabel('# of ranked units')
- plt.ylabel('Classification accuracy \n normalized')
- plt.title('Rank Ordered NAC')
- sns.despine()
compactness.ipynb at commit 571dfc0, no license · at the source
Overview
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada
- Mila - Québec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, QC Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
- Washington National Biomedical Research Center, Seattle, WA USA
Abstract
The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 11 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
pavi-rajes/assistive-sensory-motor-perturbations-influence-learned-neural-representations
571dfc0479b74a21f4b95bfda5671cf27d2ba36c, 1 May 2024Availability: 1 check, the latest on 26 September 2026: the link answers
- 26 September 2026: the link answers
53 files
- model/
analysis/ , Python, 288 linesndc_single_unit_ranked_b ased.py - model/
analysis/ , Python, 52 linesplot_loss.py - model/
analysis/ , Python, 137 linesplot_loss_with_and_no_cl da_constant_days.py - model/
analysis/ , Python, 86 linesplot_trajectories.py - model/
analysis/ , Python, 215 lines, 1 matchplot_weight_change.py - model/
analysis/ , Python, 130 linessynergy_constant_days.py - model/
analysis/ , Python, 317 linesutils.py - model/
params/ , C++, 946 linesarm_model/ copy_RNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 148 lines, 1 matcharm_model/ copy_sim_arm_model.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 306 linesbci-model-clda0.5/ copy_FNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 946 linesbci-model-clda0.5/ copy_RNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 463 lines, 2 matchesbci-model-clda0.5/ copy_sim_bci_model.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 306 linesbci-model-clda0.75/ copy_FNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 946 linesbci-model-clda0.75/ copy_RNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 463 linesbci-model-clda0.75/ copy_sim_bci_model.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 306 linesbci-model-clda0.9/ copy_FNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 946 linesbci-model-clda0.9/ copy_RNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 463 linesbci-model-clda0.9/ copy_sim_bci_model.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 306 linesbci-model-clda1/ copy_FNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 946 linesbci-model-clda1/ copy_RNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 463 linesbci-model-clda1/ copy_sim_bci_model.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 306 linesbci_model1/ copy_FNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 946 linesbci_model1/ copy_RNN.cpp - model/
params/ , C++, 463 lines, 2 matchesbci_model1/ copy_sim_bci_model.cpp - model/
sim/ , Shell, 33 linesrun_arm_model.sh - model/
sim/ , Shell, 45 linesrun_bci_model.sh - model/
sim/ , C++, 148 linessim_arm_model.cpp - model/
sim/ , C++, 463 linessim_bci_model.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 199 linesDataGenerator.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 19 linesEligibilityTrace.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 306 linesFFN.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 191 linesFactorAnalysis.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 55 linesGradient.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 275 linesInput.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 457 linesManifoldVelocityKalmanFi lter.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 77 linesMonitor.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 220 linesOptimalLinearEstimator.c pp - model/
src/ , C++, 38 linesPassiveCursor.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 57 linesPointMassArm.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 946 linesRNN.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 54 linesReadout.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 47 linesTarget.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 195 lines, 1 matchTorqueBasedArm.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 116 linesTwoLayerFFN.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 690 linesVelocityKalmanFilter.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 80 linesactivations.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 7 linesglobals.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 97 linesrand_mat.cpp - model/
src/ , C++, 312 linesutilities.cpp - neural_data_analysis/
compactness.ipynb , Jupyter, 289 lines, 2 matches - neural_data_analysis/
credit_assignment.ipynb , Jupyter, 235 lines, 2 matches - neural_data_analysis/
dimensionality.ipynb , Jupyter, 283 lines - README.md, Text, 9 lines
Code availability statement
The paper has a code availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to the authors' code: pavi-rajes/
assistive-sensory-motor- perturbations-influence- learned-neural-represent ations
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 52 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 11 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Code and data availability statement
The paper has a code and data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to the authors' code: pavi-rajes/
assistive-sensory-motor- perturbations-influence- learned-neural-represent ations
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 4 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 8 funders, 73 references.
Cite
This paper
Rajeswaran, P., Payeur, A., Lajoie, G., & Orsborn, A. L. (2026). Assistive algorithms influence neural representations in motor brain-computer interfaces. Nature communications, 17(1), 9832. https://
BibTeX
@article{rajeswaran2026a
author = {Rajeswaran, Pavithra and Payeur, Alexandre and Lajoie, Guillaume and Orsborn, Amy L},
title = {{Assistive algorithms influence neural representations in motor brain-computer interfaces}},
journal = {Nature communications},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {9832},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/
url = {https://
pmid = {42744792},
pmcid = {PMC13578456}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Rajeswaran, Pavithra
AU - Payeur, Alexandre
AU - Lajoie, Guillaume
AU - Orsborn, Amy L
TI - Assistive algorithms influence neural representations in motor brain-computer interfaces
T2 - Nature communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 17
IS - 1
SP - 9832
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1038/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Assistive algorithms influence neural representations in motor brain-computer interfaces",
"container-title": "Nature communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Rajeswaran",
"given": "Pavithra"
},
{
"family": "Payeur",
"given": "Alexandre"
},
{
"family": "Lajoie",
"given": "Guillaume"
},
{
"family": "Orsborn",
"given": "Amy L"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "17",
"issue": "1",
"page": "9832",
"DOI": "10.1038/
"PMID": "42744792",
"PMCID": "PMC13578456",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
9,
15
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.7554/elife.89421 [code]
- An emerging view of neural geometry in motor cortex supports high-performance decoding.Journal: eLifeIn common: seaborn, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, non-human primate, systems, 18 references
- [2] doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20218-3
- Selective modulation of cortical population dynamics during neuroprosthetic skill learning.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: non-human primate, systems, 19 references
- [3] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116030 [code]
- Effective cerebellar neuroprosthetic control after stroke.Journal: Cell reportsIn common: Numba, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, systems, 13 references
- [4] doi:10.7554/elife.82598 [code]
- The impact of task context on predicting finger movements in a brain-machine interface.Journal: eLifeIn common: Numba, scikit-learn, SciPy, 1 other tool, non-human primate, 14 references
- [5] doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad1053 [code]
- Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity.Journal: Journal of neural engineeringIn common: 16 references
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54738-5 [code]
- A neural implementation model of feedback-based motor learning.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: scikit-learn, Matplotlib, NumPy, non-human primate, systems, 13 references
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44405-y
- Distinct neural representations during a brain-machine interface and manual reaching task in motor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and striatum.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: systems, 13 references
- [8] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286742
- Rhesus monkeys learn to control a directional-key inspired brain machine interface via bio-feedback.Journal: PloS oneIn common: non-human primate, 13 references
- [9] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59652-y [code]
- Stabilizing brain-computer interfaces through alignment of latent dynamics.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Numba, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, non-human primate, systems, 10 references
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48008-7 [code]
- De novo motor learning creates structure in neural activity that shapes adaptation.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: seaborn, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, systems, 11 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 52 scripts, and 11 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:9476dc4ed7e0b364…
Add the badge to the code's README
If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.
Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start
.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y.svg
:target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y
:alt: OSCR
.. oscr-badge:endHTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1038/s41467-026-76109-y.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->On GitHub, open the README, choose Edit (the pencil), paste the snippet under the title, then "Commit changes".
If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.
Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.
Report a reproduction failure (signed in)
Versions of its code: the releases of its code tied to a version of this paper (the preprint, the accepted manuscript, the version of record…), each with the tracing map versioned with it.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
