OSCR

NeuroTest: a benchtop testbed for evaluating sensing-capable electrophysiology and neurostimulation systems.

Code ↔ Paper

The paper beside its authors' code: matches between them have not been computed for this paper yet.

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser; OSCR does not store it: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

C/C++ header · 28 lines · 543 B · other

  1. #ifndef IIR_filter_h
  2. #define IIR_filter_h
  3. #include "Arduino.h"
  4. #include "constants.h"
  5. class IIR_filter
  6. {
  7. public:
  8. IIR_filter();
  9. /**
  10. * @brief Applies a second order section iir filter to an input data sample
  11. *
  12. * TODO: write long
  13. *
  14. * @param input_data: Current input sample to filter
  15. * @param coef: Coefficients of a BP filter
  16. *
  17. * @return The first value in the y history buffer
  18. */
  19. double IIR_SOS(float input_data, BP_coeffs coef);
  20. private:
  21. double _x_history[3];
  22. double _y_history[3];
  23. };
  24. #endif

IIRFilter.h at commit 227ca3a, under other · at the source

Overview

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Unites States of America
  2. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Unites States of America
  3. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Institutions: University of Minnesota (United States); University of Washington (United States); University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Journal: Journal of neural engineering, volume 23, issue 6, article 066003
Dates: received 16 December 2025; accepted 22 October 2026; published online 4 November 2026; in print 1 December 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d · PMID 42913699 · PMCID PMC13733271 · OpenAlex W7223198250
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: human (organism), methods / tools (subfield)
Methods: Preprocessing, Connectivity, Spectral & time-frequency, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Machine learning, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: deep brain stimulation, electrophysiology, neuromodulation
MeSH: Electrodes, Implanted*, Implantable Neurostimulators*, Animals, Equipment Design, Humans, Reproducibility of Results (* major topic)
Topic: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (UH3 NS121565); NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203316); National Institue of Mental Health (R01 MH123634); Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00003/3)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 136 references in the paper

Abstract

Objective. The development of increasingly complex implantable neuromodulation devices requires extensive benchtop validation and testing prior to in vivo implementation. Our goal is to enable this in vitro testing by creating a benchtop system that is accessible, easy-to-use, and functions reliably across academic and industry environments, reducing discordant results that arise from discordant approaches. Furthermore, such a system paves the way for standardizing benchtop characterization of future implantable systems by establishing a repeatable and comparable methodology for validating these devices and their capabilities. Approach. We describe the NeuroTest Board (NTB), a low-cost, open-source device that combines a low-noise current source waveform generator with a high-precision data acquisition system. We provide information on its architecture, operation, and performance as an initial benchmark of the potential capabilities of the system. Main results. We demonstrate the use of the NTB to assess electrophysiology systems in two separate applications. In one case, we assess a commonly used laboratory system (the RHD2132 digitizing headstage and Open Ephys data acquisition system), while the second case characterizes an investigational neuromodulation device in development for human use (the CorTec Brain InterChange). Following this initial sensing characterization, we explore stimulation-related artifacts that would hamper in vivo data collection. With the NTB, we develop and evaluate artifact mitigation strategies for each system, thus demonstrating an example application of this benchtop testbed. Significance. The ability to test neuromodulation devices against a common benchmark will enable faster development of novel therapeutics by increasing inter-institutional reliability and decreasing troubleshooting time.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above.

uw-herron-lab/NeuroTest-Board

License: other
State: the link answers, verified on 7 November 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: 227ca3acd7591292238136e6debc36cd8e9b0d5f, 19 October 2026
Languages: C/C++ (5), C++ (4)
Size: 27 files, 9 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Supplemental material”
Holds: README, license file
Not found: CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 7 November 2026: the link answers
  • 7 November 2026: the link answers
11 files

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 9 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at the following URL/DOI: https://github.com/uw-herron-lab/NeuroTest-Board [136].

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 7 November 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 3 keywords, 6 MeSH terms, 4 funders, 110 references.

Cite

This paper

JK, M., Cho, H., Benjaber, M., TJ, D., AS, W., & JA, H. (2026). NeuroTest: a benchtop testbed for evaluating sensing-capable electrophysiology and neurostimulation systems. Journal of neural engineering, 23(6), 066003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d

BibTeX

@article{jk2026neurotest,
author = {JK, Morrow and Cho, H and Benjaber, M and TJ, Denison and AS, Widge and JA, Herron},
title = {{NeuroTest: a benchtop testbed for evaluating sensing-capable electrophysiology and neurostimulation systems}},
journal = {Journal of neural engineering},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
volume = {23},
number = {6},
pages = {066003},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
issn = {1741-2560},
doi = {10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d},
pmid = {42913699},
pmcid = {PMC13733271}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - JK, Morrow
AU - Cho, H
AU - Benjaber, M
AU - TJ, Denison
AU - AS, Widge
AU - JA, Herron
TI - NeuroTest: a benchtop testbed for evaluating sensing-capable electrophysiology and neurostimulation systems
T2 - Journal of neural engineering
J2 - J Neural Eng
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
VL - 23
IS - 6
SP - 066003
SN - 1741-2560
PB - IOP Publishing
DO - 10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d
UR - https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "NeuroTest: a benchtop testbed for evaluating sensing-capable electrophysiology and neurostimulation systems",
"container-title": "Journal of neural engineering",
"author": [
{
"family": "JK",
"given": "Morrow"
},
{
"family": "Cho",
"given": "H"
},
{
"family": "Benjaber",
"given": "M"
},
{
"family": "TJ",
"given": "Denison"
},
{
"family": "AS",
"given": "Widge"
},
{
"family": "JA",
"given": "Herron"
}
],
"container-title-short": "J Neural Eng",
"volume": "23",
"issue": "6",
"page": "066003",
"DOI": "10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d",
"PMID": "42913699",
"PMCID": "PMC13733271",
"ISSN": "1741-2560",
"publisher": "IOP Publishing",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
11,
4
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ae2359 [code]
Adaptive neuromodulation dialogues: navigating current challenges and emerging innovations in neuromodulation system development.
Journal: Journal of neural engineering
In common: 6 references, 2 authors
[2] doi:10.1088/1741-2552/acd0d5 [code]
<i>In silico</i>development and validation of Bayesian methods for optimizing deep brain stimulation to enhance cognitive control.
Journal: Journal of neural engineering
In common: 9 references, author Widge AS
[3] doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad1385 [code]
Single-pulse electrical stimulation artifact removal using the novel matching pursuit-based artifact reconstruction and removal method (MPARRM).
Journal: Journal of neural engineering
In common: methods / tools, 8 references
[4] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287921 [code]
Modular pipeline for reconstruction and localization of implanted intracranial ECoG and sEEG electrodes.
Journal: PloS one
In common: methods / tools, 8 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7 [code]
Closed-loop control of theta oscillations enhances human hippocampal network connectivity.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 6 references, author Widge AS
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51443-1 [code]
Theta-burst direct electrical stimulation remodels human brain networks.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 7 references
[7] doi:10.64898/2026.02.10.704848 [code]
A cardiac pulse signal affects local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes across clinical targets
Journal: bioRxiv (preprint)
In common: 3 references, author Denison TJ
[8] doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.938694 [code]
Toward biophysical markers of depression vulnerability.
Journal: Frontiers in psychiatry
In common: 2 references, author Widge AS
[9] doi:10.1038/s41531-023-00474-4
DBS-evoked cortical responses index optimal contact orientations and motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease.
Journal: NPJ Parkinson's disease
In common: 5 references
[10] doi:10.1038/s41531-024-00663-9
Modulation of DBS-induced cortical responses and movement by the directionality and magnitude of current administered.
Journal: NPJ Parkinson's disease
In common: 5 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Add the badge to the code's README

OSCR: the badge of this paper

If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.

Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->
reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end
HTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb82d.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

On GitHub, open the README, choose Edit (the pencil), paste the snippet under the title, then "Commit changes".

If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Versions of its code: the releases of its code tied to a version of this paper (the preprint, the accepted manuscript, the version of record…), each with the tracing map versioned with it.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.