OSCR

Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition.

Overview

  1. School of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NP, United Kingdom
Institutions: University of Kent (United Kingdom)
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), volume 36, issue 4, article bhag041
Dates: received 27 August 2025; accepted 9 March 2026; published online 16 April 2026; in print April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhag041 · PMID 41990114 · PMCID PMC13089548 · OpenAlex W7154571480
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: other (modality), human (organism), pain (population), cellular / molecular (subfield)
Methods: Statistics, Preprocessing, Evoked potentials
Keywords: afferent inhibition, corticospinal excitability, pain, sensorimotor interaction
MeSH: Neural Inhibition*, Pain*, Pyramidal Tracts*, Touch*, Adult, Afferent Pathways, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Female, Fingers, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Physical Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (Neurology, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Doctoral Training Partnership (ES/P00072X/1); South East Network for Social Sciences; Economic and Social Research Council
Citations: cited by 1 paper (Europe PMC); 60 references in the paper

Abstract

Pain can profoundly impact motor functioning to support self-preservation, yet its influence on the interaction between tactile input and corticospinal excitability (CSE) remains unclear. Across two experiments, a short- and long-latency afferent inhibition (AI) paradigm examined (i) whether tactile AI is modulated in the presence of tonic pain and (ii) the effect of pain on CSE in the presence of tactile afferent stimulation. In experiment 1, a single electrotactile stimulus (0.2- or 0.4-ms duration) was delivered to the index finger at one of six intervals (15 to 160 ms) before transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the ipsilateral first dorsal interosseous (FDI) hotspot. In experiment 2, the same procedure was tested during moderate, tonic forearm heat pain. Both experiments showed significant AI at 25, 35, and 160 ms delays, with facilitation at 60 ms. This effect was not influenced by the duration of afferent stimulation (experiment 1) nor by tonic heat pain (experiment 2). However, CSE was significantly reduced in painful compared to painless conditions (P = 0.021, η2p = 0.132), indicating that while tonic pain modulates CSE, tactile afferent inhibition is unaffected. These findings show an inhibitory effect of pain on motor output that, in this context, occurs alongside preserved tactile-motor interactions.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability

Raw data are openly available on OSF (https://osf.io/nhkm4/).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 4 keywords, 17 MeSH terms, 3 funders, 60 references.

Cite

This paper

Gwynne, L., & Tamè, L. (2026). Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 36(4), bhag041. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag041

BibTeX

@article{gwynne2026pain,
author = {Gwynne, Louisa and Tamè, Luigi},
title = {{Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition}},
journal = {Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {36},
number = {4},
pages = {bhag041},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
issn = {1047-3211},
doi = {10.1093/cercor/bhag041},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag041},
pmid = {41990114},
pmcid = {PMC13089548}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Gwynne, Louisa
AU - Tamè, Luigi
TI - Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition
T2 - Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
J2 - Cereb Cortex
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/01
VL - 36
IS - 4
SP - bhag041
SN - 1047-3211
PB - Oxford University Press
DO - 10.1093/cercor/bhag041
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag041
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1093/cercor/bhag041",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition",
"container-title": "Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Gwynne",
"given": "Louisa"
},
{
"family": "Tamè",
"given": "Luigi"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Cereb Cortex",
"volume": "36",
"issue": "4",
"page": "bhag041",
"DOI": "10.1093/cercor/bhag041",
"PMID": "41990114",
"PMCID": "PMC13089548",
"ISSN": "1047-3211",
"publisher": "Oxford University Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag041",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
1
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1111/ejn.70548
Conscious Tactile Perception Depends on Early Processing in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: other, 12 references, author Louisa Gwynne
[2] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10529-w
Top-down influence of the inferior frontal gyrus on motor cortex excitability during pain empathy.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: pain, other, 4 references
[3] doi:10.1113/jp290979 [code]
A method of compensating for the excitability of spinal motoneurones when estimating the magnitude of potentials evoked in skeletal muscles.
Journal: The Journal of physiology
In common: other, 3 references
[4] doi:10.2147/jir.s633117 [code]
Single-Nucleus Transcriptomic Mapping Reveals Correlative Microglial Changes Associated with rTMS in the Motor Cortex After Spinal Cord Injury.
Journal: Journal of inflammation research
In common: pain, other, cellular / molecular, 1 reference
[5] doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00960 [code]
Personalizing neuromodulation for chronic pain: A connectivity-guided trial.
Journal: Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics
In common: pain, other, 1 reference
[6] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100366 [code]
Lower resting-state functional connectivity between frontoparietal and sensory networks is associated with recent pain intensity in a community sample of youth.
Journal: Neuroimage. Reports
In common: pain, 1 reference
[7] doi:10.1111/ejn.70639 [code]
Action Intentions Shape Task- and Phase-Specific Integration of Object Features.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: 2 references
[8] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116443
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation enhances exercise-induced hypoalgesia in patients with chronic low back pain.
Journal: iScience
In common: pain, other, 1 reference
[9] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378 [code]
From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis.
Journal: Neuroimage. Reports
In common: 2 references
[10] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0358552 [code]
High-frequency stimulation-induced secondary hyperalgesia shifts temporal order judgment and increases precuneus nodal degree in healthy adults.
Journal: PloS one
In common: pain, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.