Conscious Tactile Perception Depends on Early Processing in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Overview

1. School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Abstract

The primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has long been implicated in tactile perception, yet its precise role in conscious tactile detection remains uncertain. The current study investigated the causal and time‐specific involvement of S1 in tactile detection using single‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (spTMS). In two experiments, spTMS was applied over contralateral S1, an active control site (inferior parietal lobe; IPL), or under a sham condition at short (25 and 75 ms; Experiment 1) or longer (130 ms; Experiment 2) intervals following electrotactile stimulation of the finger. Participants performed a go/no‐go detection task at sensory threshold. In Experiment 1, tactile sensitivity was significantly reduced following early S1 stimulation compared with both active control and sham conditions. In contrast, no such effect was observed at a later timepoint in Experiment 2. Self‐reported TMS‐related distraction ratings did not account for the observed sensitivity differences, suggesting sensitivity‐specific modulation by early TMS rather than general task disruption. Together, these findings support a causal role for early S1 activity in conscious tactile detection. We propose that disruption at this early stage impairs initial encoding of tactile input, thereby attenuating subsequent perceptual awareness. Overall, the results underscore the critical contribution of S1 in conscious tactile detection and are compatible with recent accounts in which conscious tactile perception emerges from processing within a distributed neural network.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:avmep, at OSF; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

Data are openly available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/avmep/. Analysis scripts are available upon request to the corresponding authors (L.G. or L.T.).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

• Publisher: n/a → Wiley

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 5 keywords, 10 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 63 references.

Cite

This paper

Gwynne, L., & Tamè, L. (2026). Conscious Tactile Perception Depends on Early Processing in Primary Somatosensory Cortex. The European journal of neuroscience, 63(10), e70548. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70548

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag041

Pain suppresses corticospinal excitability, independent of tactile afferent inhibition.

Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

In common: other, 12 references, author Louisa Gwynne

[2] doi:10.1159/000552942 [code]

How Standardized Is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Depression? Large-Cohort Modeling Reveals Systematic Dosimetric Variability.

Journal: Psychotherapy and psychosomatics

In common: other, 2 references

[3] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378 [code]

From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis.

Journal: Neuroimage. Reports

In common: 2 references

[4] doi:10.2147/jpr.s624205

Comparative Efficacy of Invasive and Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Techniques for Chronic Central and Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Journal: Journal of pain research

In common: other, 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1111/ejn.70597

Superficial Ventral Premotor Pathways to Primary Motor Cortex Shape the Temporal Coordination of Precision Graspinnog.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: other, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116384

Human-relevant transcranial magnetic stimulation in awake rhesus macaques assisted by a non-invasive head and arm fixation apparatus.

Journal: iScience

In common: other, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1874302 [code]

Architecture-data matching for EEG-EMG decoding: compact deep models match classical spectral decoders on the WAY-EEG-GAL grasp-and-lift dataset.

Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience

In common: other, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x

Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males.

Journal: Experimental brain research

In common: other, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb3579

Elevating cerebellar theta oscillations boosts noninvasively induced motor plasticity.

Journal: Science advances

In common: other, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00960 [code]

Personalizing neuromodulation for chronic pain: A connectivity-guided trial.

Journal: Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics

In common: other, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.