Distinct Neural Signatures of Novel Word-Referent Mapping in Monolingual and Bilingual Toddlers.

Overview

1. The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
2. Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

Abstract

Evidence suggests that bilingualism impacts children's lexical and brain development. Yet, the development of the brain's language network in early childhood–a period marked by rapid vocabulary growth–remains poorly understood, particularly with respect to differences between bilingual and monolingual children. This study used eye tracking and functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine the cortical representations of lexical acquisition in frontal and temporal lobes. We relied on a fast mapping task that included three trial types: Familiar (familiar label–referent mapping; e.g., ball), Disambiguation (novel label–referent mapping; e.g., dax), and Retention (long term retention of two novel referents). Sixty English‐learning monolingual and bilingual children (27–32 months), from a majority English‐speaking society, participated in the study. Results revealed that monolinguals showed increased looking to the novel referent during disambiguation trials, with a similar trend during retention. In contrast, bilinguals did not show reliable novel label–referent mapping behavior. Brain activity differences between the language groups emerged in right temporal regions during disambiguation trials, with bilinguals showing increasing HbO activity in this region, than monolinguals. Bilinguals’ right hemisphere greater activity may reflect reduced automaticity in the use of disambiguation. These results offer foundational insight into neural markers supporting lexical acquisition, especially for those who may struggle in language acquisition such as late talkers.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:ab8cz, at OSF; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

Data is available via Open Science—https://osf.io/ab8cz/?view_only=68d564c246fd455988ff1b699d013e88

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 3, 28 September 2026

• Publisher: n/a → Wiley

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 8 keywords, 12 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 73 references.

Cite

This paper

Arredondo, M. M., & Weatherhead, D. (2026). Distinct Neural Signatures of Novel Word-Referent Mapping in Monolingual and Bilingual Toddlers. Developmental science, 29(5), e70272. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70272

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1111/desc.70187 [code]

Prenatal Volume in the Bilateral Superior Temporal Gyrus Associates With Children's Expressive Vocabulary at 24-36 Months.

Journal: Developmental science

In common: developmental, 6 references

[2] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101782 [code]

Do babies perceive cries as speech?

Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscience

In common: fNIRS, 5 references

[3] doi:10.1117/1.nph.12.2.025011 [code]

NIRSTORM: a Brainstorm extension dedicated to functional near-infrared spectroscopy data analysis, advanced 3D reconstructions, and optimal probe design

Journal: n/a

In common: fNIRS, 5 references

[4] doi:10.1117/1.nph.13.s3.s32602 [code]

Cedalion tutorial: a Python-based framework for comprehensive analysis of multimodal fNIRS and DOT from the lab to the everyday world.

Journal: Neurophotonics

In common: fNIRS, 4 references

[5] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0358044 [code]

An exploratory fNIRS study on directional asymmetry in segmental discrimination: Lateral-rhotic (/la-ra/) and labial-dorsal (/ba-ga/) contrasts tested in 5- and 9-month-old Japanese infants.

Journal: PloS one

In common: fNIRS, developmental, 3 references

[6] doi:10.1117/1.nph.13.3.035009

Single-subject detection of speech network activation using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Journal: Neurophotonics

In common: fNIRS, 4 references

[7] doi:10.1117/1.nph.13.3.035001 [code]

Understanding variability in full-term newborns' fNIRS data: the impact of birth weight and gestational age on infants' speech perception abilities.

Journal: Neurophotonics

In common: fNIRS, developmental, 2 references

[8] doi:10.1117/1.nph.13.2.025009

Distinct neural signatures of phonemic and semantic verbal fluency: a double dissociation in cortical activation and functional connectivity revealed by fNIRS.

Journal: Neurophotonics

In common: fNIRS, 3 references

[9] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72916-5 [code]

Precision fMRI reveals that the language network exhibits adult-like left-hemispheric lateralization by 4 years of age.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 3 references

[10] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag151

Brain function in language and associated networks in non- or minimally verbal children.

Journal: Brain communications

In common: 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.