OSCR

Mitophagy-Oxidative Stress Molecular Subtypes Define an Immunosuppressive Ecosystem and Vulnerabilities in Glioblastoma.

Overview

Authors: Changjiang He1, Yang Wang2, Hongliang Zhong2
ORCID iDs: Hongliang Zhong
  1. Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, The Third Clinical Medical College Capital Medical University Beijing China
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
Journal: Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, volume 30, issue 10, article e71154
Dates: received 24 January 2026; accepted 10 April 2026; published online 16 May 2026; in print May 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1111/jcmm.71154 · PMID 42141926 · PMCID PMC13179569 · OpenAlex W7161411612
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request
Categories: genetics / omics (modality), human (organism), other condition (population)
Methods: Preprocessing, Connectivity, Statistics, Machine learning
Keywords: glioblastoma, immunotherapy, mitophagy oxidative stress, prognostic signature, tumour microenvironment
MeSH: Brain Neoplasms*, Glioblastoma*, Mitophagy*, Oxidative Stress*, Biomarkers, Tumor, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Humans, Prognosis, Tumor Microenvironment (* major topic)
Topic: Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (Epidemiology, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 55 references in the paper

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumour with an immunosuppressive environment and poor prognosis; however, the roles of mitophagy and oxidative stress in its prognosis remain underexplored. This study analysed multi‐omics data from TCGA‐GBM (n = 168) and two GEO cohorts (GSE43378, n = 50; GSE147352, n = 85), compiling 603 mitophagy and oxidative stress‐related genes. Unsupervised consensus clustering identified molecular subtypes, and prognostic genes were found via univariate Cox regression, leading to a refined gene signature using LASSO. The tumour immune microenvironment was characterized with ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and ssGSEA, while immunotherapy response was predicted using TIDE and IPS. Drug sensitivity was evaluated with GDSC and CTRP data, and a clinical nomogram integrating the gene signature and clinical variables was constructed and validated. Two molecular subtypes, C1 and C2, showed different prognoses (HR = 0.64, p = 0.011) and immune profiles. A 7‐gene signature indicated high‐risk patients had worse survival (p < 0.001) and an immunosuppressive environment. The risk score correlated with anti‐PD‐1 response (p < 0.05) and predicted therapy sensitivity. The signature was an independent prognostic factor (HR = 3.37, p < 0.001), and the nomogram accurately predicted survival at 1, 3, and 5 years. An innovative prognostic signature from mitophagy and oxidative stress genes stratifies GBM patients, characterizes the immunosuppressive microenvironment, and identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities for personalized treatment.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

Data links

Data Availability Statement

The original datasets analysed in this study are publicly available. The transcriptomic and clinical data for the TCGA‐GBM cohort can be accessed via the Genomic Data Commons (GDC) portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) under the project ‘TCGA‐GBM’. The validation datasets GSE43378 and GSE147352 are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession numbers GSE43378 and GSE147352, respectively. The mitophagy and oxidative stress‐related gene (MORG) list, the derived 7‐gene signature, and the analysis codes supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 55 references.

Cite

This paper

He, C., Wang, Y., & Zhong, H. (2026). Mitophagy-Oxidative Stress Molecular Subtypes Define an Immunosuppressive Ecosystem and Vulnerabilities in Glioblastoma. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 30(10), e71154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.71154

BibTeX

@article{he2026mitophagy,
author = {He, Changjiang and Wang, Yang and Zhong, Hongliang},
title = {{Mitophagy-Oxidative Stress Molecular Subtypes Define an Immunosuppressive Ecosystem and Vulnerabilities in Glioblastoma}},
journal = {Journal of cellular and molecular medicine},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {30},
number = {10},
pages = {e71154},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {1582-1838},
doi = {10.1111/jcmm.71154},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.71154},
pmid = {42141926},
pmcid = {PMC13179569}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - He, Changjiang
AU - Wang, Yang
AU - Zhong, Hongliang
TI - Mitophagy-Oxidative Stress Molecular Subtypes Define an Immunosuppressive Ecosystem and Vulnerabilities in Glioblastoma
T2 - Journal of cellular and molecular medicine
J2 - J Cell Mol Med
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/01
VL - 30
IS - 10
SP - e71154
SN - 1582-1838
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1111/jcmm.71154
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.71154
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1111/jcmm.71154",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Mitophagy-Oxidative Stress Molecular Subtypes Define an Immunosuppressive Ecosystem and Vulnerabilities in Glioblastoma",
"container-title": "Journal of cellular and molecular medicine",
"author": [
{
"family": "He",
"given": "Changjiang"
},
{
"family": "Wang",
"given": "Yang"
},
{
"family": "Zhong",
"given": "Hongliang"
}
],
"container-title-short": "J Cell Mol Med",
"volume": "30",
"issue": "10",
"page": "e71154",
"DOI": "10.1111/jcmm.71154",
"PMID": "42141926",
"PMCID": "PMC13179569",
"ISSN": "1582-1838",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.71154",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
1
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1007/s12672-026-05414-1
Construction and validation of a model based on necroptosis-related genes for predicting glioma prognosis.
Journal: Discover oncology
In common: other condition, 7 references
[2] doi:10.1007/s10571-026-01726-6
Gene Expression Analysis of Mitochondria-Associated Membrane (MAM)-Related Genes in ER Stress and Alzheimer's Disease.
Journal: Cellular and molecular neurobiology
In common: genetics / omics, 7 references
[3] doi:10.3390/ijms27136068 [code]
Loss of Neuropeptide Y Signaling Accompanies the Neural-to-Mesenchymal Transcriptional Transition in Glioblastoma: A Multi-Scale Transcriptomic Analysis.
Journal: International journal of molecular sciences
In common: genetics / omics, other condition, 5 references
[4] doi:10.3390/cancers18132092
TGFB2 as a Prognostic Biomarker Associated with Myeloid-Enriched, Multi-Checkpoint-Activated Immunosuppression in Diffuse Glioma: A Multi-Cohort Transcriptomic Study.
Journal: Cancers
In common: genetics / omics, other condition, 5 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76587-0 [code]
Uncovering the signaling networks of disseminated glioblastoma cells in vivo with INSIGHT.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: genetics / omics, other condition, 5 references
[6] doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1797067
Network-driven prioritization and functional phenotyping nominate TTC23 as a biomarker-informed target in chlorpromazine repurposing for glioblastoma.
Journal: Frontiers in pharmacology
In common: other condition, 6 references
[7] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115875
Role of NR2F2-mediated reprogramming of endothelial cells in glioblastoma progression.
Journal: iScience
In common: genetics / omics, other condition, 5 references
[8] doi:10.32604/or.2026.079221
Single-Cell Sequencing Reveals the Heterogeneity of Glioma and Identifies IGFBP2 as A Potential Therapeutic Target.
Journal: Oncology research
In common: genetics / omics, other condition, 4 references
[9] doi:10.3390/ijms27083598
Decoding Prognostic Signatures in Brain Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer via Integrated Multi-Omics and Network Analysis.
Journal: International journal of molecular sciences
In common: genetics / omics, other condition, 4 references
[10] doi:10.1007/s12031-026-02598-7
A Lipoylation-PDH-TCA Transcriptional Deficit in the Alzheimer's Disease Cortex - Donor-level Multi-cohort Evidence with Neuronal-composition, Disease-specificity and Matched-null Controls.
Journal: Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN
In common: genetics / omics, 5 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.