Spatial Distance and Temporal Attentional Focus Modulate Voluntary Action Preparation and Awareness.

Overview

1. Impact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL) INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR5292 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
2. Department of Psychology, School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
3. Neuro‐Immersion, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
4. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
5. Center for Mind/Brain Sciences—CIMeC, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

Abstract

Peripersonal space (PPS)—the immediate space surrounding the body—modulates perception and motor control. However, its impact on how voluntary actions are initiated and subjectively experienced remains underexplored. Similarly, how directing attention to different phases of an action, such as intention formation versus execution, and anticipating outcomes of an action, modulates the neural readiness for movement, has yet to be fully examined. This study investigates whether spatial proximity, attentional focus, and anticipated action outcomes influence action preparation and action awareness, using a virtual reality adaptation of the Libet clock paradigm during EEG recordings. Neural results reveal that attentional focus and anticipated action outcomes modulate different phases of motor preparation, as indexed by the readiness potential (RP)—a gradual buildup of neural activity preceding voluntary movement. Focusing on decision timing (without subsequent action outcomes) enhances early RP amplitude and decreases the late RP slope, suggesting increased preparatory neural engagement during intention formation. In contrast, focusing on action execution leads to a steeper late RP slope, indicating later and faster motor activity buildup when attention is directed toward movement onset. Anticipating action outcomes increased late RP slope, which was accompanied by the temporal binding effect: when a tone followed the action, both decision and action estimates shifted toward it. Spatial proximity also modulates early RP slope, with a steeper buildup in near versus far space, suggesting facilitated motor preparation within PPS. It further enhances the late RP amplitude when participants focused on their intention to act. Behavioral results show that actions are perceived as occurring earlier when the clock is displayed near compared to far, indicating that PPS influences the temporal perception of action timing. Overall, these findings highlight the dynamic interplay among external spatial context and internal cognitive processes in shaping motor preparation and action awareness. Importantly, a temporal internal attentional focus on intention to act modulates early RP—traditionally considered an unconscious stage of neural readiness. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of how PPS and the locus of attention on specific action phases affect action preparation and awareness, with potential implications for future research on the sense of agency and voluntary action decision making.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability Statement

All primary data, analysis scripts and materials are publicly available on the Open Science Framework repository (https://osf.io/tjus4/).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 8 keywords, 14 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 58 references.

Cite

This paper

Kong, G., Barlerin, B., Desoche, C., Miller, L., Pavani, F., Farnè, A., & Vernet, M. (2026). Spatial Distance and Temporal Attentional Focus Modulate Voluntary Action Preparation and Awareness. Psychophysiology, 63(3), e70280. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70280

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07304-y

Anxiety disorders alter cognitive-motor integration during visuomotor adaptation and retention.

Journal: Experimental brain research

In common: EEG, cognitive, 11 references

[2] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag108 [code]

Action fluency and conscious intention: being aware of what we are about to do.

Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

In common: EEG, cognitive, 8 references

[3] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0316-25.2026 [code]

Neural Mechanisms of Self-Generated Action Sequences.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: EEG, cognitive, 7 references

[4] doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag220 [code]

Neural mechanisms of awareness of action.

Journal: PNAS nexus

In common: EEG, cognitive, 6 references

[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74824-0 [code]

Learning regularities in noise engages both neural predictive activity and representational changes.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: cognitive, 1 reference, author Marine Vernet

[6] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003982 [code]

No evidence for modulation of the readiness potential by respiratory phase during natural breathing.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: EEG, 4 references

[7] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07342-6 [code]

A portable solution for simultaneous human movement and mobile EEG acquisition: readiness potential for basketball free-throw shooting.

Journal: Experimental brain research

In common: EEG, 3 references

[8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73568-1 [code]

No evidence of neural feature-specific pre-activation during the prediction of an upcoming stimulus.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: cognitive, author Marine Vernet

[9] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0889-25.2026 [code]

Neural Evidence for Action-Related Somatosensory Predictions.

Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience

In common: EEG, 2 references

[10] doi:10.1111/psyp.70268

Shared Neural Codes for Emotion Recognition in Emoji and Human Faces.

Journal: Psychophysiology

In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.