Intracranial Arterial Calcification on Computed Tomography and Risk of Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Overview

1. Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary arterial calcification on computed tomography (CT), or CT-coronary artery calcification (CAC), is a widely studied risk factor for acute coronary events, but although intracranial arterial calcification on CT brain imaging (CT-IAC) is also a frequent finding in older individuals, there is no consensus on its prognostic significance, particularly whether its presence, severity, or site predict cognitive impairment or dementia. Given the clinical and mechanistic importance of any associations, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Studies published before 30 January 2026 were identified from bibliographic databases, reference lists, and forward or backward screening. Inclusion criteria were: (1) studies of adults linking CT-IAC/CAC with later cognitive impairment or dementia; (2) reporting adjusted effect measures with 95% confidence interval or p values (or calculable); (3) calcification assessed by CT/CT angiography and cognition by recognised tests or expert evaluation. Studies were summarised qualitatively and pooled quantitatively depending on heterogeneity.

Results: Six cross-sectional studies and three longitudinal studies reported data on CT-IAC and cognitive status. Among five studies that reported associations for presence vs. absence of CT-IAC, presence of calcification was weakly associated with cognitive impairment or dementia (three cross-sectional studies – pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.42, 0.88–2.28, p = 0.15; two longitudinal studies – aOR = 1.51, 1.03–2.22, p = 0.033; all studies – aOR = 1.48, 1.10–1.99, p = 0.01). Among five studies that reported associations for more severe vs. milder CT-IAC, severe calcification was more strongly associated with the cognitive outcome (two cross-sectional studies – pooled aOR = 2.29, 0.50–10.57, p = 0.29; three longitudinal studies – aOR = 1.84, 1.28–2.65, p = 0.001; all studies – aOR = 1.74, 1.28–2.36, p = 0.0004), including in two longitudinal cohorts in patients with stroke/transient ischaemic attack (pooled aOR = 1.73, 1.22–2.46, p = 0.002). In two longitudinal studies, severity of vertebrobasilar CT-IAC also predicted dementia (pooled aOR = 2.12, 1.06–4.21, p = 0.033), and severity of medial/internal elastic lamina (IEL) CT-IAC was a stronger predictor of dementia (pooled aOR = 2.35, 1.29–4.28, p = 0.005) than severity of intimal CT-IAC (pooled aOR = 1.29, 0.75–2.23, p = 0.36). For coronary CT-CAC, three longitudinal cohorts revealed weak associations with dementia (per standard deviation increase in calcification measures – pooled adjusted hazards ratio = 1.15, 1.02–1.30, p = 0.025).

Conclusion: In longitudinal studies, presence and severity of CT-IAC are both independently associated with dementia, driven mainly by medial/IEL calcification, with weaker associations for intimal and coronary calcification. In cross-sectional studies, the associations for both CT-IAC measures were of a similar magnitude to the longitudinal analyses but were not statistically significant. Future studies should determine age- and dementia-subtype specific associations.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• figshare:32023944, at figshare; found in DataCite

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials. Further enquiries can be directed to Professor Peter M. Rothwell ().

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 42 references.

Cite

This paper

Li, K., Osomo, O. A., & Rothwell, P. M. (2026). Intracranial Arterial Calcification on Computed Tomography and Risk of Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000551193

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3390/s26165121 [code]

Electrophysiological Signatures of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review of sEMG Features, Fatigue Indices and AI-Based Classifiers.

Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: other, 2 references

[2] doi:10.3390/biomedicines14081829

Transvenous Embolisation-Based Strategies for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal: Biomedicines

In common: stroke, other, clinical / translational, 1 reference

[3] doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101693

Absolute risk of acquired brain injury and rehabilitation needs in Denmark, 2014-2023: a population-based prospective cohort study.

Journal: The Lancet regional health. Europe

In common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference

[4] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-54533-w

Hyperlipidemia induces hippocampal inflammation and loss of vascularity and can be rescued by silencing RIPK1.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: stroke, Alzheimer's / dementia, 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1186/s13195-026-02018-3

Impact of Apolipoprotein E4 on blood-brain barrier integrity in target replacement murine models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: Alzheimer's research & therapy

In common: stroke, Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1016/j.jnha.2026.100836

Accelerated biological aging and brain structural alterations linking air pollution to dementia risk: a prospective cohort study.

Journal: The journal of nutrition, health & aging

In common: Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1002/alz.71811

Female vulnerability to microvascular transport dysfunction emerges early across the Alzheimer's disease continuum.

Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association

In common: stroke, other, Alzheimer's / dementia, 1 other category

[8] doi:10.1002/alz.71530 [code]

Differential associations of plasma biomarkers with Alzheimer's disease and small vessel disease: A multimodal imaging study.

Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association

In common: stroke, other, Alzheimer's / dementia, 1 other category

[9] doi:10.3390/brainsci16080882 [code]

How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.2147/jpr.s624205

Comparative Efficacy of Invasive and Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Techniques for Chronic Central and Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Journal: Journal of pain research

In common: other, clinical / translational, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.