OSCR

Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal.

Overview

  1. Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France
  2. Iconeus, Paris, France
  3. Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Laboratory of Dynamics of Neuronal Structure in Health and Disease, Paris, France
  4. Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
  5. Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  6. Gulbenkian Institute for Molecular Medicine, Lisboa, Portugal
  7. Centro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa, CCUL, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), volume 4, article IMAG.a.1191
Dates: received 31 May 2025; accepted 5 March 2026; published online 7 April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1162/imag.a.1191 · PMID 41958632 · PMCID PMC13058852 · OpenAlex W7135091930
Open access: diamond, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: other (modality), mouse (organism), methods / tools (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Connectivity, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Statistics, Machine learning, Preprocessing, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: functional ultrasound imaging (fUSI), motion artifact correction, awake mouse neuroimaging, functional connectivity, signal processing optimization
Topic: Neural dynamics and brain function (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 80 references in the paper

Abstract

Functional ultrasound imaging (fUSI) is a promising tool for studying brain activity in awake and behaving animals, offering insights into neural dynamics that are more naturalistic than those obtained under anesthesia. However, motion artifacts pose a significant challenge, introducing biases that can compromise the integrity of the data. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation and benchmarking of strategies for detecting and removing motion artifacts in transcranial fUSI acquisitions of awake mice. We evaluated 792 denoising strategies across four datasets, focusing on clutter filtering, scrubbing, frequency filtering, and confound regression methods. Our findings highlight the superior performance of adaptive clutter filtering and aCompCor confound regression in mitigating motion artifacts while preserving functional connectivity patterns. We also demonstrate that high-pass filtering is generally more effective than band-pass filtering in the presence of motion artifacts. Additionally, we show that with effective clutter filtering, scrubbing may become optional, which is particularly beneficial for experimental designs where motion correlates with conditions of interest. Based on these insights, we propose two optimized denoising paradigms tailored to different experimental constraints, providing practical recommendations for enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of fUSI data. Our findings challenge current practices in the field and have immediate practical implications for existing fUSI analysis workflows, paving the way for more sophisticated applications of fUSI in studying complex brain functions and dysfunctions in awake experimental paradigms.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data and Code Availability

The analyses presented in this study were conducted in large parts using a proprietary software currently developed by Iconeus (Paris, France). As such, the source code is not publicly available. The raw datasets supporting the conclusions of this article include raw beamformed I/Q data (>15 TB) and resampled power Doppler data (>1 TB). Given the substantial size of these datasets, they cannot be hosted on standard data repositories. A subset of power Doppler scans denoised using the proposed paradigms is provided on Zenodo for illustration purpose: https://zenodo.org/records/15557854. Researchers interested in accessing the raw data are invited to contact the Office of Research Contracts at Inserm to initiate discussions regarding data transfer or use.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 9 authors, 5 keywords, 77 references.

Cite

This paper

Le Meur-Diebolt, S., Cybis Pereira, F., Mariani, J.-C., Kliewer, A., Farinha-Ferreira, M., Bertolo, A., Osmanski, B.-F., Lenkei, Z., & Deffieux, T. (2026). Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 4, IMAG.a.1191. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1191

BibTeX

@article{lemeurdiebolt2026robust,
author = {Le Meur-Diebolt, Samuel and Cybis Pereira, Felipe and Mariani, Jean-Charles and Kliewer, Andrea and Farinha-Ferreira, Miguel and Bertolo, Adrien and Osmanski, Bruno-Félix and Lenkei, Zsolt and Deffieux, Thomas},
title = {{Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal}},
journal = {Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {4},
pages = {IMAG.a.1191},
publisher = {MIT Press},
issn = {2837-6056},
doi = {10.1162/imag.a.1191},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1191},
pmid = {41958632},
pmcid = {PMC13058852}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Le Meur-Diebolt, Samuel
AU - Cybis Pereira, Felipe
AU - Mariani, Jean-Charles
AU - Kliewer, Andrea
AU - Farinha-Ferreira, Miguel
AU - Bertolo, Adrien
AU - Osmanski, Bruno-Félix
AU - Lenkei, Zsolt
AU - Deffieux, Thomas
TI - Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal
T2 - Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
J2 - Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/07
VL - 4
SP - IMAG.a.1191
SN - 2837-6056
PB - MIT Press
DO - 10.1162/imag.a.1191
UR - https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1191
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1162/imag.a.1191",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal",
"container-title": "Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Le Meur-Diebolt",
"given": "Samuel"
},
{
"family": "Cybis Pereira",
"given": "Felipe"
},
{
"family": "Mariani",
"given": "Jean-Charles"
},
{
"family": "Kliewer",
"given": "Andrea"
},
{
"family": "Farinha-Ferreira",
"given": "Miguel"
},
{
"family": "Bertolo",
"given": "Adrien"
},
{
"family": "Osmanski",
"given": "Bruno-Félix"
},
{
"family": "Lenkei",
"given": "Zsolt"
},
{
"family": "Deffieux",
"given": "Thomas"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Imaging Neurosci (Camb)",
"volume": "4",
"page": "IMAG.a.1191",
"DOI": "10.1162/imag.a.1191",
"PMID": "41958632",
"PMCID": "PMC13058852",
"ISSN": "2837-6056",
"publisher": "MIT Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1191",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
7
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1162/netn.a.547 [code]
An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.
Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: 10 references
[2] doi:10.1002/hbm.70561
Benchmarking fMRI Denoising Pipelines.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: methods / tools, 10 references
[3] doi:10.1109/tmi.2026.3704144 [code]
Microbubble Track-Based Functional Ultrasound Localization Microscopy in Awake Mice.
Journal: IEEE transactions on medical imaging
In common: other, mouse, 7 references
[4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1198 [code]
MEPrep: A robust pipeline for multi-echo fMRI denoising and preprocessing.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: methods / tools, 7 references
[5] doi:10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1 [code]
Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction.
Journal: Brain informatics
In common: methods / tools, 6 references
[6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1357
Biphasic acclimation for simultaneous wide-field fluorescent Ca<sup>2+</sup> imaging and fMRI of awake mice.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: mouse, 5 references
[7] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003768
Premotor cortex hemodynamic responses primarily reflect perceptual rather than specific motor aspects of decision making.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: 4 references
[8] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1354 [code]
Development of a 24-channel 3T phased-array coil for fMRI in awake monkeys: Mitigating spatiotemporal artifacts in ferumoxytol-weighted functional connectivity estimation.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: 5 references
[9] doi:10.1093/brain/awaf443 [code]
Cellular signatures underlying functional resilience in presymptomatic frontotemporal dementia.
Journal: Brain : a journal of neurology
In common: 5 references
[10] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003856 [code]
Aging and metabolism contribute separately to brain-body health.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: 5 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.