OSCR

Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction.

Overview

Authors: Tatiana Medvedeva1, Irina Knyazeva1, Ruslan Masharipov1, Alexander Korotkov1, Denis Cherednichenko1, Maxim Kireev1,2
  1. N. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
  2. St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Journal: Brain informatics, volume 13, issue 1, article 18
Dates: received 5 October 2025; accepted 11 April 2026; published online 5 May 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1 · PMID 42084762 · PMCID PMC13197499 · OpenAlex W4415376810
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: dead link
Categories: fMRI (modality), methods / tools (subfield)
Methods: Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Machine learning, Statistics, Connectivity, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: fMRI, Resting state, Functional connectivity, Denoising, Machine learning
Topic: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: IHB RAS
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 63 references in the paper

Abstract

The rapid evolution of machine learning (ML) methods has yielded promising results in human brain neuroscience. However, the reproducibility of ML applications in neuroimaging remains limited, challenging the generalizability of inferences to broader populations. In addition to the inherent variability of the brain activity (both in healthy and pathological states), poor reproducibility is further enhanced by inconsistencies in data preprocessing techniques and methods for calculating functional connectivity (FC), which are used as parameters for brain state classification. To systematically assess the impact of abovementioned factors on ML applications to fMRI data, we benchmarked a comprehensive set of FC analysis pipelines for the classification task between fMRI data recorded in two fundamentally different states: eyes open and eyes closed. In contrast to studies involving heterogeneous clinical populations or using complex cognitive tasks, our controlled experimental design – based on two independent datasets of healthy participants collected in different laboratories – minimizes variability related to a task design or pathological brain states. Classification accuracy and reproducibility were compared for 256 distinct FC analysis pipelines, covering common preprocessing approaches, brain parcellation schemes, and connectivity metrics. Notably, we employed two ways of validation: a direct cross-site validation strategy – when a model was trained on one site and tested on another, and few-shot domain adaptation – when a few samples of testing site were added to the train set. Despite the substantial variability in pipeline configurations, we observed consistently high classification accuracy (~ 90%), confirming that FC-based models can robustly discriminate between well-defined brain states (eye conditions) across different acquisition sites. Best results both in terms of classification accuracy and stability were observed using Pearson correlation and tangent space parametrization as FC, Brainnetome as atlas, and confound regression strategies based on the CompCor method. These findings highlight the resilience of rs-fMRI FC-derived characteristics to methodological variation and support their utility in the discovery of biomarkers, particularly in settings that involve stable and reproducible brain states.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

ihb-ibr-department/benchmarkingeoec](https:

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link is dead, verified on 28 September 2026
Evidence: found in the paper
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Data availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link is dead
  • 28 September 2026: the link is dead

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability

The analysis code and all scripts for reproducing the results, including denoising pipelines, atlas processing, connectivity computation, ICC and QC-FC analysis, and ML benchmarking, are publicly available at [https://github.com/IHB-IBR-department/BenchmarkingEOEC](https:/github.com/IHB-IBR-department/BenchmarkingEOEC) . The repository includes detailed installation instructions, core workflows, and Markdown documentation for methods and data formats.All data necessary to reproduce the results of this study (preprocessed timeseries, coverage masks) are available at: [https://disk.yandex.ru/d/fNz33QPwJQj7HQ](https:/disk.yandex.ru/d/fNz33QPwJQj7HQ). Original raw data for China dataset is available at: [https://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/retro/BeijingEOEC.html]. Financial support for this dataset was provided by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China: 30770594 and a grant from the National High Technology Program of China (863): 2008AA02Z405.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

  • Authors: added Tatiana Medvedeva (0009-0004-1381-0800); Ruslan Masharipov (0000-0003-4162-3725); Maxim Kireev (0000-0003-3409-6293); removed Tatiana Medvedeva; Ruslan Masharipov; Maxim Kireev

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 5 keywords, 1 funder, 63 references.

Cite

This paper

Medvedeva, T., Knyazeva, I., Masharipov, R., Korotkov, A., Cherednichenko, D., & Kireev, M. (2026). Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction. Brain informatics, 13(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1

BibTeX

@article{medvedeva2026benchmarking,
author = {Medvedeva, Tatiana and Knyazeva, Irina and Masharipov, Ruslan and Korotkov, Alexander and Cherednichenko, Denis and Kireev, Maxim},
title = {{Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction}},
journal = {Brain informatics},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {13},
number = {1},
pages = {18},
publisher = {Springer},
issn = {2198-4018},
doi = {10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1},
pmid = {42084762},
pmcid = {PMC13197499}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Medvedeva, Tatiana
AU - Knyazeva, Irina
AU - Masharipov, Ruslan
AU - Korotkov, Alexander
AU - Cherednichenko, Denis
AU - Kireev, Maxim
TI - Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction
T2 - Brain informatics
J2 - Brain Inform
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/05
VL - 13
IS - 1
SP - 18
SN - 2198-4018
PB - Springer
DO - 10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction",
"container-title": "Brain informatics",
"author": [
{
"family": "Medvedeva",
"given": "Tatiana"
},
{
"family": "Knyazeva",
"given": "Irina"
},
{
"family": "Masharipov",
"given": "Ruslan"
},
{
"family": "Korotkov",
"given": "Alexander"
},
{
"family": "Cherednichenko",
"given": "Denis"
},
{
"family": "Kireev",
"given": "Maxim"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Brain Inform",
"volume": "13",
"issue": "1",
"page": "18",
"DOI": "10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1",
"PMID": "42084762",
"PMCID": "PMC13197499",
"ISSN": "2198-4018",
"publisher": "Springer",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00305-1",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
5
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1162/netn.a.547 [code]
An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.
Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: fMRI, 9 references
[2] doi:10.7554/elife.108109 [code]
Multimodal MRI marker of cognition explains the association between cognition and mental health in the UK Biobank.
Journal: eLife
In common: 7 references
[3] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0370-25.2026 [code]
Pretraining for Large-Scale Functional Connectome Fingerprinting Supports Generalization and Transfer Learning in Functional Neuroimaging.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: fMRI, methods / tools, 7 references
[4] doi:10.1002/hbm.70561
Benchmarking fMRI Denoising Pipelines.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: fMRI, methods / tools, 6 references
[5] doi:10.1002/hbm.70506 [code]
Revisiting Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations (ALFF) in Resting-State fMRI: Clarifications and Improvements.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: fMRI, methods / tools, 7 references
[6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1198 [code]
MEPrep: A robust pipeline for multi-echo fMRI denoising and preprocessing.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: fMRI, methods / tools, 6 references
[7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1191
Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: methods / tools, 6 references
[8] doi:10.1002/hbm.70559 [code]
Replicability of Functional Brain Networks: A Study Through the Lens of Seven Resting-State Networks.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: fMRI, 5 references
[9] doi:10.1038/s41398-026-04426-3 [code]
Resting-state brain age is associated with cognitive and sensorimotor abnormalities in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a validation & longitudinal study.
Journal: Translational psychiatry
In common: 6 references
[10] doi:10.1162/netn.a.545 [code]
Structure-function multilayer network integration and cognition in multiple sclerosis.
Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: fMRI, 6 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.