OSCR

Failure to detect entorhinal grid-like signals in a passive navigation human fMRI study.

Code ↔ Paper

2 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 2 matches
  1. [1] § Results › Unimodal signal interference ↔ Analyses_GridLikeSignals.R, lines 319–373 · score 0.54 · behavioural task scores, fold signal, predicted, magnitude, Unimodal, hemisphere
  2. [2] § Methods › Statistical analyses ↔ Analyses_GridLikeSignals.R, lines 319–373 · score 0.51 · behavioral task, GLS magnitudes, scoring, hemisphere, Welch, fold

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

R · 373 lines · 13 KB · MIT · 2 matches

  1. # grid_analysis.R
  2. # Analysis script for Kransberg et al. (2025) - GLS fMRI Study
  3. # Author: Jonas Kransberg
  4. # Date last modified: 02.05.2025
  5. # Author contact information: [email hidden]
  7. # 0. Load required libraries
  8. library(tidyverse)
  9. library(lmerTest)
  11. # 1. Generate dummy data
  12. set.seed(123)
  13. # 1.1 Create participant-level info for manual segmentation
  14. n_manual <- 110
  15. manual_ids <- factor(1:n_manual)
  16. participant_manual <- tibble(
  17. subject_id = manual_ids,
  18. visit_age = runif(n_manual, 16, 80),
  19. subject_sex = factor(sample(c("Male","Female"), n_manual, replace = TRUE)),
  20. total_correct_combined = sample(1:7, n_manual, replace = TRUE)
  21. ) %>%
  22. mutate(
  23. age_group = factor(ifelse(visit_age < 40, "Under40", "Above40"),
  24. levels = c("Under40","Above40"))
  25. )
  27. # 1.2 Expand to row-level for manual segmentation
  28. manual <- expand_grid(
  29. participant_manual,
  30. segmentation = "manual_segmentation",
  31. xfoldsym = c(1,5,6,7),
  32. roi = factor(c("rh_erc","lh_erc")),
  33. smoothing = c(0,4)
  34. ) %>%
  35. mutate(
  36. beta_gridcode_mean_combined = rnorm(n(), 0, 0.1),
  37. rayleigh_z = runif(n(), 0, 1), # spatial stability metric
  38. temporally_stable = runif(n(), 0, 100) # temporal stability metric (percent)
  39. )
  41. # 1.3 Create participant-level info for automatic segmentation
  42. n_auto <- 207
  43. auto_ids <- factor(1:n_auto)
  44. participant_auto <- tibble(
  45. subject_id = auto_ids,
  46. visit_age = runif(n_auto, 18.2, 78.6),
  47. subject_sex = factor(sample(c("Male","Female"), n_auto, replace = TRUE)),
  48. total_correct_combined = sample(1:7, n_auto, replace = TRUE)
  49. ) %>%
  50. mutate(
  51. age_group = factor(ifelse(visit_age < 40, "Under40", "Above40"),
  52. levels = c("Under40","Above40"))
  53. )
  55. automatic <- expand_grid(
  56. participant_auto,
  57. segmentation = "automatic_segmentation",
  58. xfoldsym = c(1,5,6,7),
  59. roi = factor(c("rh_erc","lh_erc")),
  60. smoothing = c(0,4)
  61. ) %>%
  62. mutate(
  63. beta_gridcode_mean_combined = rnorm(n(), 0, 0.1)
  64. )
  66. # Combine datasets
  67. combined <- bind_rows(manual, automatic)
  69. # 2. Grid-Like Signal (GLS) Analyses
  70. ## 2.1 6-Fold GLS vs Zero
  71. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  72. cat("6-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  73. print(t.test(filter(manual, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 0)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  74. mu=0, alternative = "greater", na.rm = TRUE))
  75. }
  77. ## 2.2 Control Symmetry Checks (5- and 7-fold)
  78. for(sym in c(5,7)){
  79. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  80. cat(sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  81. print(t.test(filter(manual, xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  82. mu=0, alternative = "greater", na.rm = TRUE))
  83. }
  84. }
  86. ## 2.3 Age-Group Stratification (<40 vs ≥40)
  87. ### Younger group (<40)
  88. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  89. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  90. cat("Younger (<40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  91. data_y <- filter(manual, age_group=="Under40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  92. print(t.test(data_y$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0, alternative = "greater", na.rm = TRUE))
  93. }
  94. }
  96. ### Older group (≥40)
  97. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  98. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  99. cat("Older (≥40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  100. data_o <- filter(manual, age_group=="Above40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  101. print(t.test(data_o$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0, alternative = "greater", na.rm = TRUE))
  102. }
  103. }
  105. ## 2.4 Between-Group Comparison for 6-Fold
  106. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  107. cat("Between-group Welch t-test for 6-fold in", region, "\n")
  108. dt <- filter(manual, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  109. print(t.test(beta_gridcode_mean_combined ~ age_group, data=dt, alternative = "greater"))
  110. }
  112. ## 2.5 Continuous Age Effects (LME)
  113. model_6f <- lmer(beta_gridcode_mean_combined ~ visit_age * roi + subject_sex +
  114. (1|subject_id), data = filter(manual, xfoldsym==6, smoothing == 0))
  115. summary(model_6f)
  117. # 3. Temporal and Spatial Stability Analyses
  118. temp <- manual %>%
  119. filter(xfoldsym == 6, smoothing == 0)
  120. ## 3.1 Temporal Stability Analyses
  121. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  122. df <- filter(temp, roi == region)
  123. cat("Temporal stability one-sample t-test in", region, "(H0: mean = 50%)\n")
  124. print(t.test(df$temporally_stable, mu = 50))
  125. cat("Temporal stability age-group comparison in", region, "\n")
  126. print(t.test(temporally_stable ~ age_group, data = df))
  127. }
  129. ## 3.2 Spatial Stability Analyses
  130. # Using Rayleigh's Z, test age-group differences
  131. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  132. df <- filter(temp, roi == region)
  133. cat("Spatial stability age-group t-test for rayleigh_z in", region, "\n")
  134. print(t.test(rayleigh_z ~ age_group, data = df))
  135. }
  138. # 4 Control Analyses: Smoothing
  139. ## 4.1 6-Fold GLS vs Zero
  140. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  141. cat("6-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  142. print(t.test(filter(manual, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 4)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  143. mu=0))
  144. }
  146. ## 4.2 Control Symmetry Checks (5- and 7-fold)
  147. for(sym in c(5,7)){
  148. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  149. cat(sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  150. print(t.test(filter(manual, xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 4)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  151. mu=0))
  152. }
  153. }
  155. ## 4.3 Age-Group Stratification (<40 vs ≥40)
  156. ### Younger group (<40)
  157. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  158. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  159. cat("Younger (<40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  160. data_y <- filter(manual, age_group=="Under40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 4)
  161. print(t.test(data_y$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0))
  162. }
  163. }
  165. ### Older group (≥40)
  166. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  167. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  168. cat("Older (≥40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  169. data_o <- filter(manual, age_group=="Above40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 4)
  170. print(t.test(data_o$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0))
  171. }
  172. }
  174. ## 4.4 Between-Group Comparison for 6-Fold
  175. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  176. cat("Between-group Welch t-test for 6-fold in", region, "\n")
  177. dt <- filter(manual, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 4)
  178. print(t.test(beta_gridcode_mean_combined ~ age_group, data=dt))
  179. }
  181. ## 4.5 Correlate GLS by smoothing type
  182. manualsmoothing_rh <- manual %>%
  183. filter(xfoldsym == 6, roi == "rh_erc") %>%
  184. select(subject_id, smoothing, beta_gridcode_mean_combined) %>%
  185. pivot_wider(names_from = smoothing,
  186. values_from = beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  187. names_prefix = "smoothing_")
  190. cor.test(manualsmoothing_rh$smoothing_0, manualsmoothing_rh$smoothing_4)
  193. manualsmoothing_lh <- manual %>%
  194. filter(xfoldsym == 6, roi == "lh_erc") %>%
  195. select(subject_id, smoothing, beta_gridcode_mean_combined) %>%
  196. pivot_wider(names_from = smoothing,
  197. values_from = beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  198. names_prefix = "smoothing_")
  200. cor.test(manualsmoothing_lh$smoothing_0, manualsmoothing_lh$smoothing_4)
  203. # 5 Control Analyses: Segmentation
  204. #Re-do primary analyses with automatically segmented EC masks.
  205. ## 5.1 6-Fold GLS vs Zero
  206. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  207. cat("6-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  208. print(t.test(filter(automatic, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 0)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  209. mu=0))
  210. }
  212. ## 5.2 Control Symmetry Checks (5- and 7-fold)
  213. for(sym in c(5,7)){
  214. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  215. cat(sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  216. print(t.test(filter(automatic, xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  217. mu=0))
  218. }
  219. }
  221. ## 5.3 Age-Group Stratification (<40 vs ≥40)
  222. ### Younger group (<40)
  223. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  224. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  225. cat("Younger (<40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  226. data_y <- filter(automatic, age_group=="Under40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  227. print(t.test(data_y$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0))
  228. }
  229. }
  231. ### Older group (≥40)
  232. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  233. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  234. cat("Older (≥40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  235. data_o <- filter(automatic, age_group=="Above40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  236. print(t.test(data_o$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0))
  237. }
  238. }
  240. ## 5.4 Between-Group Comparison for 6-Fold
  241. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  242. cat("Between-group Welch t-test for 6-fold in", region, "\n")
  243. dt <- filter(automatic, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  244. print(t.test(beta_gridcode_mean_combined ~ age_group, data=dt))
  245. }
  247. ## 5.5 Correlate GLS by smoothing type
  248. # Right hemisphere
  249. combinedcorrh <- combined %>%
  250. filter(xfoldsym == 6, roi == "rh_erc", smoothing == 0) %>%
  251. select(subject_id, segmentation, beta_gridcode_mean_combined) %>%
  252. pivot_wider(names_from = segmentation,
  253. values_from = beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  254. names_prefix = "seg_")
  257. cor.test(combinedcorrh$seg_manual_segmentation, combinedcorrh$seg_automatic_segmentation)
  259. # Left hemisphere
  260. combinedcorlh <- combined %>%
  261. filter(xfoldsym == 6, roi == "lh_erc", smoothing == 0) %>%
  262. select(subject_id, segmentation, beta_gridcode_mean_combined) %>%
  263. pivot_wider(names_from = segmentation,
  264. values_from = beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  265. names_prefix = "seg_")
  268. cor.test(combinedcorlh$seg_manual_segmentation, combinedcorlh$seg_automatic_segmentation)
  271. # 6 High-Performance Participants Analysis
  272. ## 6. 1 Behavioral Performance Ceiling Effects
  273. behavrh <- manual %>% filter(xfoldsym == 6, roi == "rh_erc", smoothing == 0)
  274. behavlh <- manual %>% filter(xfoldsym == 6, roi == "lh_erc", smoothing == 0)
  275. table(behavrh$age_group, behavrh$total_correct_combined >= 6)
  277. ## 6.2 Age-Group Difference in Task Scores
  278. print(t.test(total_correct_combined ~ age_group, data=behavrh))
  281. ## 6.3 GLS After Excluding Low Scorers (<=6)
  282. high_perf <- filter(manual, total_correct_combined >= 6)
  284. ## 6.4 6-Fold GLS vs Zero
  285. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  286. cat("6-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  287. print(t.test(filter(high_perf, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 0)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  288. mu=0))
  289. }
  291. ## 6.5 Control Symmetry Checks (5- and 7-fold)
  292. for(sym in c(5,7)){
  293. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  294. cat(sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  295. print(t.test(filter(high_perf, xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  296. mu=0))
  297. }
  298. }
  300. ## 6.6 Age-Group Stratification (<40 vs ≥40)
  301. ### Younger group (<40)
  302. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  303. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  304. cat("Younger (<40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  305. data_y <- filter(high_perf, age_group=="Under40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  306. print(t.test(data_y$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0))
  307. }
  308. }
  310. ### Older group (≥40)
  311. for(sym in c(6,5,7)){
  312. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  313. cat("Older (≥40):", sym, "-fold GLS vs zero in", region, "\n")
  314. data_o <- filter(high_perf, age_group=="Above40", xfoldsym==sym, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  315. print(t.test(data_o$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, mu=0))
  316. }
  317. }
  319. ## 6.7 Between-Group Comparison for 6-Fold
  320. for(region in c("rh_erc","lh_erc")){
  321. cat("Between-group Welch t-test for 6-fold in", region, "\n")
  322. dt <- filter(high_perf, xfoldsym==6, roi==region, smoothing == 0)
  323. print(t.test(beta_gridcode_mean_combined ~ age_group, data=dt))
  324. }
  327. ## 6.8 Correlation Analyses
  328. # Behavioural task scores and Age
  329. print(cor.test(behavrh$visit_age, behavrh$total_correct_combined))
  331. # Behavioural task scores and GLS magnitude
  332. # Right hemisphere
  333. print(cor.test(behavrh$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, behavrh$total_correct_combined))
  335. # Left hemisphere
  336. print(cor.test(behavlh$beta_gridcode_mean_combined, behavlh$total_correct_combined))
  339. # 7. Unimodal (1-Fold) Signal Analyses
  340. ## 7.1 1-Fold Signal vs Behavior
  341. filtered <- manual %>% filter(smoothing == 0)
  342. #rh_cor
  343. print(cor.test(filter(filtered, xfoldsym==1, roi == "rh_erc")$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  344. filter(filtered, xfoldsym==1, roi == "rh_erc")$total_correct_combined))
  346. #lh_cor
  347. print(cor.test(filter(filtered, xfoldsym==1, roi == "lh_erc")$beta_gridcode_mean_combined,
  348. filter(filtered, xfoldsym==1, roi == "lh_erc")$total_correct_combined))
  350. ## 7.2 1-Fold Signal
  351. lme_1f <- lmer(beta_gridcode_mean_combined ~ visit_age * roi + subject_sex +
  352. (1|subject_id), data = filter(filtered, xfoldsym==1))
  353. summary(lme_1f)
  355. ## 7.3 1-Fold Predicting 7-Fold & 6-Fold
  356. wide <- manual %>%
  357. filter(smoothing == 0) %>%
  358. select(subject_id, roi, xfoldsym, beta_gridcode_mean_combined, visit_age) %>%
  359. pivot_wider(
  360. names_from = xfoldsym,
  361. names_prefix = "fold_",
  362. values_from = beta_gridcode_mean_combined
  363. )
  365. lme_1v7 <- lmer(fold_7 ~
  366. fold_1 * roi + visit_age +
  367. (1|subject_id), data=wide)
  368. summary(lme_1v7)
  370. lme_1v6 <- lmer(fold_6 ~
  371. fold_1 * roi + visit_age +
  372. (1|subject_id), data=wide)
  373. summary(lme_1v6)

Analyses_GridLikeSignals.R at commit de7a08f, under MIT · at the source

Overview

Authors: Jonas Kransberg1, Anne Cecilie Sjøli Bråthen1, Emilie Sogn Falch1, Knut E.Ø. Øverbye1, Pablo F. Garrido1,2, Anders M. Fjell1,3, Matthias Stangl4,5, Thomas Wolbers6,7, Markus H. Sneve1, Kristine B. Walhovd1,3
ORCID iDs: Jonas Kransberg, Anne Cecilie Sjøli Bråthen, Emilie Sogn Falch, Knut E.Ø. Øverbye, Pablo F. Garrido, Anders M. Fjell, Matthias Stangl, Thomas Wolbers, Markus H. Sneve, Kristine B. Walhovd
  1. Center for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway
  2. Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  3. Computational Radiology and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Center for Systems Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroimaging Center, Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
  5. Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
  6. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
  7. Aging, Cognition & Technology Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
Institutions: University of Oslo (Norway); Oslo University Hospital (Norway); Boston University (United States); Boston Medical Center (United States); German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (Germany); Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (Germany)
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), volume 4, article IMAG.a.1196
Dates: received 6 May 2025; accepted 14 February 2026; published online 7 April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1162/imag.a.1196 · PMID 41958631 · PMCID PMC13058850 · OpenAlex W7137844700
Open access: diamond, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: fMRI (modality), human (organism)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Connectivity, Graphs, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: aging, entorhinal cortex, grid cells, fMRI, spatial navigation
Topic: Memory and Neural Mechanisms (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: European Research Council (771375); Research Council of Norway (301395)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 55 references in the paper

Abstract

Grid cells in the human entorhinal cortex (EC) play a critical role in spatial navigation and memory. The EC is also one of the first regions affected by ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. This pre-registered functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study aimed to detect grid-cell-like signals (GLS) in a passive virtual navigation task. Contrary to our hypotheses and previous findings, we did not observe significant GLS at a population level, even in younger participants. Further exploratory analyses investigated the impact of task-engagement, as inferred from object-location memory performance, and showed no relationship with GLS magnitude. We also examined potential influences of a confounding one-fold directional signal and various data-processing choices but observed no consistent patterns. Our findings, consistent with recent null results from similar studies, suggest that passive navigation paradigms may be insufficient for reliably eliciting grid-like signals in human fMRI.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 2 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

jokran/GLS_fMRI_Analysis_Kransberg_2025

License: MIT
State: the link answers, verified on 29 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: de7a08fd0593e7f7645913ff16899121b0473fc3, 2 May 2025
Languages: R (1)
Size: 4 files, 1 script
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Data and Code Availability”
Holds: README, license file
Not found: CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: lmerTest (1 file), tidyverse (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 29 September 2026: the link answers
  • 29 September 2026: the link answers
3 files
At the source: github.com/jokran/GLS_fMRI_Analysis_Kransberg_2025

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 2 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and Code Availability

The study pre-registration can be found at https://aspredicted.org/rfx5-gmmq.pdf. The code used for the analyses is available at https://github.com/jokran/GLS_fMRI_Analysis_Kransberg_2025. The LCBC dataset has restricted access, but requests can be made to the corresponding author, and some of the data can be made available given appropriate ethical and data protection approvals.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 10 authors, 5 keywords, 2 funders, 55 references.

Cite

This paper

Kransberg, J., Sjøli Bråthen, A. C., Falch, E. S., Øverbye, K. E., Garrido, P. F., Fjell, A. M., Stangl, M., Wolbers, T., Sneve, M. H., & Walhovd, K. B. (2026). Failure to detect entorhinal grid-like signals in a passive navigation human fMRI study. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 4, IMAG.a.1196. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1196

BibTeX

@article{kransberg2026failure,
author = {Kransberg, Jonas and Sjøli Bråthen, Anne Cecilie and Falch, Emilie Sogn and Øverbye, Knut E.Ø. and Garrido, Pablo F. and Fjell, Anders M. and Stangl, Matthias and Wolbers, Thomas and Sneve, Markus H. and Walhovd, Kristine B.},
title = {{Failure to detect entorhinal grid-like signals in a passive navigation human fMRI study}},
journal = {Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {4},
pages = {IMAG.a.1196},
publisher = {MIT Press},
issn = {2837-6056},
doi = {10.1162/imag.a.1196},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1196},
pmid = {41958631},
pmcid = {PMC13058850}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Kransberg, Jonas
AU - Sjøli Bråthen, Anne Cecilie
AU - Falch, Emilie Sogn
AU - Øverbye, Knut E.Ø.
AU - Garrido, Pablo F.
AU - Fjell, Anders M.
AU - Stangl, Matthias
AU - Wolbers, Thomas
AU - Sneve, Markus H.
AU - Walhovd, Kristine B.
TI - Failure to detect entorhinal grid-like signals in a passive navigation human fMRI study
T2 - Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
J2 - Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/07
VL - 4
SP - IMAG.a.1196
SN - 2837-6056
PB - MIT Press
DO - 10.1162/imag.a.1196
UR - https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1196
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1162/imag.a.1196",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Failure to detect entorhinal grid-like signals in a passive navigation human fMRI study",
"container-title": "Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kransberg",
"given": "Jonas"
},
{
"family": "Sjøli Bråthen",
"given": "Anne Cecilie"
},
{
"family": "Falch",
"given": "Emilie Sogn"
},
{
"family": "Øverbye",
"given": "Knut E.Ø."
},
{
"family": "Garrido",
"given": "Pablo F."
},
{
"family": "Fjell",
"given": "Anders M."
},
{
"family": "Stangl",
"given": "Matthias"
},
{
"family": "Wolbers",
"given": "Thomas"
},
{
"family": "Sneve",
"given": "Markus H."
},
{
"family": "Walhovd",
"given": "Kristine B."
}
],
"container-title-short": "Imaging Neurosci (Camb)",
"volume": "4",
"page": "IMAG.a.1196",
"DOI": "10.1162/imag.a.1196",
"PMID": "41958631",
"PMCID": "PMC13058850",
"ISSN": "2837-6056",
"publisher": "MIT Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1196",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
7
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02363-4 [code]
Cortical thickness changes precede high levels of amyloid by at least 7 years.
Journal: Nature neuroscience
In common: lmerTest, tidyverse, 3 authors
[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1242 [code]
Stable individual differences dominate adult brain volume variation until later life.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: 3 authors
[3] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117505 [code]
Impaired spatial coding and neuronal hyperactivity in the medial entorhinal cortex of aged APP knock-in mice.
Journal: Cell reports
In common: lmerTest, tidyverse, 8 references
[4] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003755 [code]
Action information is integrated into entorhinal representations of conceptual space and is reflected in eye movements.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: 9 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72620-4 [code]
Grid maps are disrupted after large-scale arena expansion and recover with experience.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 5 references
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73263-1 [code]
Distributed neural codes of the 3D position in the marmoset frontal cortex and hippocampus.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 5 references
[7] doi:10.1002/hbm.70512 [code]
Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: lmerTest, tidyverse, fMRI, 3 references
[8] doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.05.068 [code]
An abstract relational map emerges in the human medial prefrontal cortex with consolidation.
Journal: Current biology : CB
In common: fMRI, 4 references
[9] doi:10.1162/netn.a.547 [code]
An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.
Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: fMRI, 4 references
[10] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1252 [code]
Does the brain's E:I balance really shape long-range temporal correlations? Lessons learned from 3T MRI.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: tidyverse, fMRI, 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.