Sex differences in activations to the sight of faces, scenes, body parts and tools in visual and non-visual cortical regions leading to the human hippocampus.

Overview

1. Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick,Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
2. Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick,Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
3. Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience,Oxford, UK
4. Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University,825 Zhangheng Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 201203 China

Abstract

In a large Human Connectome Project dataset of 504 females and 452 males performing a 0-back memory task with visual images using the HCP-MultiModalParcellation, faces activated some key cortical regions more (using FDR correction) in females than males, including in the left hemisphere the fusiform face cortex and inferior temporal visual cortex TE2p; and visual motion regions in the MT+ complex. The sight of scenes activated more in males than females scene-related cortical regions including the medial parahippocampal scene (or place) regions such as PHA2 and earlier regions in the ventromedial cortical visual scene stream such as POS2, with differences found in both hemispheres. The sight of body parts activated more in females than males the inferior temporal visual cortex TE2p, some MT+ visual motion regions such as FST and PH, and also the perirhinal ‘What’ visual stream input to the hippocampal system via the perirhinal cortex, PeEc, in the left hemisphere. The sight of tools activated more in males than females and in the left hemisphere anterior temporal lobe regions such as TE2a, and regions that provide ‘What’ inputs to the hippocampal system, the lateral parahippocampal cortex and perirhinal cortex, PeEc. These cortical specialisations are likely to be relevant to behavioral differences for females compared to males in the processing of socially relevant stimuli such as faces and body parts; and to behavioral differences for males compared to females in the processing of spatial scenes and tools, with behavioral sex differences for scenes vs. faces present in these participants.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-026-00933-6.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• humanconnectome.org/hcp-protocols-ya-task-fmri, at Human Connectome Project; found in the text, “HCP task and working memory paradigm”

Data availability

Data and code availability. The data are available at the HCP website http://www.humanconnectome.org/. Standard Matlab functions were used to calculate the functional connectivity, to perform the regression analyses, and to perform the FDR corrections for multiple comparisons.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 6 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 83 references.

Cite

This paper

Zhang, R., Rolls, E. T., & Feng, J. (2026). Sex differences in activations to the sight of faces, scenes, body parts and tools in visual and non-visual cortical regions leading to the human hippocampus. Biology of sex differences, 17(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-026-00933-6

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1002/hbm.70494

Visual Cortical Lateralization in Activations and Functional Connectivity to the Sight of Faces, Scenes, Body Parts, and Tools.

Journal: Human brain mapping

In common: humanconnectome.org/hcp-protocols-ya-task-fmri, systems, 35 references, 2 authors

[2] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10169-0 [code]

Shared representations in brains and models reveal a two-route cortical organization during scene perception.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 9 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10262-4 [code]

Brain-wide information flow dynamics during novel visual processing in humans.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 7 references

[4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73262-2 [code]

Robust but independent sex differences in human brain function, structure, and behavior.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 6 references

[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74274-8 [code]

Regional sex differences in human cortical anatomy vary in their morphometric bases and overlap with sex chromosomal and gonadal influences.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 6 references

[6] doi:10.1073/pnas.2513126123

The cortical scene processing network emerges in infancy, prior to independent navigation experience.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 4 references

[7] doi:10.1007/s00429-026-03152-2 [code]

Limb-selective regions in the lateral temporal lobe shrink from childhood to adulthood.

Journal: Brain structure & function

In common: 4 references

[8] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10843-3 [code]

Self-supervised learning yields representational signatures of category-selective cortex.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 4 references

[9] doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9326213/v1 [code]

Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brain

Journal: Research Square (preprint)

In common: 5 references

[10] doi:10.64898/2026.03.09.710558 [code]

Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brain

Journal: bioRxiv (preprint)

In common: 5 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.