OSCR

Continuity Therapy for couples living with acquired brain injury: a non-randomised uncontrolled feasibility study.

Overview

  1. School of Psychology, University of Birmingham,Birmingham, UK
  2. Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust,Birmingham, UK
  3. School of Psychology, University of Derby,Derby, UK
  4. Centre for Movement, Occupational & Rehabilitation Research (MOReS), Oxford Brookes University,Oxford, UK
Institutions: University of Birmingham (United Kingdom); Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust (United Kingdom); University of Derby (United Kingdom); Oxford Brookes University (United Kingdom)
Journal: Pilot and feasibility studies, volume 12, issue 1, article 116
Dates: received 19 February 2026; accepted 20 May 2026; published online 9 June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2 · PMID 42260664 · PMCID PMC13471640 · OpenAlex W7163901398
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: behavior only (modality), human (organism), stroke (population), clinical / translational (subfield)
Methods: Statistics
Keywords: Brain injury, Stroke, Marriage, Relationships, Therapy, Intervention, Continuity Therapy, Continuity Theory
Topic: Traumatic Brain Injury Research (Epidemiology, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR203522); Department of Health and Social Care; Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 65 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability statement

The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

  • Funding: added National Institute for Health and Care Research: NIHR203522; Department of Health and Social Care; Research for Patient Benefit Programme

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 8 keywords, 57 references.

Cite

This paper

Riley, G. A., Gajewska, U., Hagger, B., Raj, A. J., Yasmin, N., & Yeates, G. (2026). Continuity Therapy for couples living with acquired brain injury: a non-randomised uncontrolled feasibility study. Pilot and feasibility studies, 12(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2

BibTeX

@article{riley2026continuity,
author = {Riley, Gerard A. and Gajewska, Urszula and Hagger, Barbara and Raj, Asweeni Jansdin and Yasmin, Natasha and Yeates, Giles},
title = {{Continuity Therapy for couples living with acquired brain injury: a non-randomised uncontrolled feasibility study}},
journal = {Pilot and feasibility studies},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {12},
number = {1},
pages = {116},
publisher = {BMC},
issn = {2055-5784},
doi = {10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2},
pmid = {42260664},
pmcid = {PMC13471640}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Riley, Gerard A.
AU - Gajewska, Urszula
AU - Hagger, Barbara
AU - Raj, Asweeni Jansdin
AU - Yasmin, Natasha
AU - Yeates, Giles
TI - Continuity Therapy for couples living with acquired brain injury: a non-randomised uncontrolled feasibility study
T2 - Pilot and feasibility studies
J2 - Pilot Feasibility Stud
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/09
VL - 12
IS - 1
SP - 116
SN - 2055-5784
PB - BMC
DO - 10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Continuity Therapy for couples living with acquired brain injury: a non-randomised uncontrolled feasibility study",
"container-title": "Pilot and feasibility studies",
"author": [
{
"family": "Riley",
"given": "Gerard A."
},
{
"family": "Gajewska",
"given": "Urszula"
},
{
"family": "Hagger",
"given": "Barbara"
},
{
"family": "Raj",
"given": "Asweeni Jansdin"
},
{
"family": "Yasmin",
"given": "Natasha"
},
{
"family": "Yeates",
"given": "Giles"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Pilot Feasibility Stud",
"volume": "12",
"issue": "1",
"page": "116",
"DOI": "10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2",
"PMID": "42260664",
"PMCID": "PMC13471640",
"ISSN": "2055-5784",
"publisher": "BMC",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01854-2",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
9
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1007/s10936-026-10264-7 [code]
Assessment Battery for Communication (ABaCo): An Extension of Normative Data to Elderly Individuals.
Journal: Journal of psycholinguistic research
In common: behavior only, 1 reference
[2] doi:10.3758/s13414-026-03289-6 [code]
Saccade length consistency during reading and shape-scanning.
Journal: Attention, perception & psychophysics
In common: behavior only, 1 reference
[3] doi:10.1007/s00415-026-14028-0 [code]
Personality change after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal: Journal of neurology
In common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
[4] doi:10.2196/79141 [code]
Older Adults' Motivators and Barriers to Using Mindfulness Apps for Stress Management in Brain Health Interventions: Interview Study.
Journal: JMIR formative research
In common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
[5] doi:10.1159/000553643
Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation versus None for Post-Stroke Dysphagia: Rationale, Design, and Protocol for the Parallel Group Superiority Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Acute Stroke Dysphagia Trial (PhEAST) (ISRCTN98886991).
Journal: Cerebrovascular diseases extra
In common: behavior only, stroke, clinical / translational
[6] doi:10.1007/s11695-026-08828-6 [code]
Enhancing Postoperative Outcomes After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: a Pilot Study of Inhibitory Control Training, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Psychosocial Aftercare.
Journal: Obesity surgery
In common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
[7] doi:10.1080/07853890.2026.2634472
Incidence of silent cerebral lesions during pulsed field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Journal: Annals of medicine
In common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
[8] doi:10.64898/2026.05.12.26353056 [code]
Neuroimaging and behavioural biomarkers of post-stroke cognitive recovery outcomes
Journal: medRxiv (preprint)
In common: behavior only, stroke, clinical / translational
[9] doi:10.1093/geroni/igag064
BrainHealth 360: cognitive intervention for older adults designed using a participatory framework.
Journal: Innovation in aging
In common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
[10] doi:10.1111/ejn.70681
Bidirectional EEG Neurofeedback of Sensorimotor Beta Oscillations Reveals Asymmetric Modulation and Strategy-Dependent Learning.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.