Beyond the cortex, early deficits, late recovery: a systematic review of language outcomes and subcortical mapping after awake craniotomy for diffuse gliomas.

Overview

1. School of Medicine, University of Sunderland,Tyne and Wear, UK
2. School of Medicine, University of Manchester,Manchester, UK
3. School of Medicine, University of Buckingham,Buckingham, UK
4. School of Medicine, University of Warwick,Warwick, UK
5. School of Medicine, University of Cardiff,Cardiff, UK
6. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham,Birmingham, UK
7. Bowen University Teaching Hospital,Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Abstract

Background: To evaluate immediate and long-term postoperative language outcomes in patients undergoing awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) for diffuse gliomas in eloquent regions.

Methods: PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD420261342690) of adults (≥ 18 years) with supratentorial diffuse glioma in the language-dominant hemisphere enrolled in both randomised and non-randomised studies of awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation and language mapping. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL (from 2010 to March 2026). Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using standardised tools (JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists). Due to methodological heterogeneity, narrative synthesis was performed.

Results: Ten studies (532 patients enrolled; 55.3% male) published 2011–2025 were included; tumour grade was reported inconsistently, with higher-grade tumours predominating in the larger cohorts and at least 114 patients having WHO grade 4 disease. Early postoperative deficits ranged from 2.2 to 100% depending on assessment timing and measure (immediate post-op: up to 100%; day 7 to week 1: 2.2–22%). Persistent deficits at ≥ 3 months ranged from 0 to 47%. In three studies reporting whole-cohort outcomes with standardised assessment, rates were 0–5.6%. Papagno et al., using 3-month cut-offs, found that 47% of patients with uncinate fasciculus resection had impairment in famous face naming versus 10% with the tract preserved. The general trend was early decline followed by improvement, with most reported deficits resolving by around 3 months. Heterogeneous deficit definitions and inconsistent baseline assessment preclude treating this as a prognostic pattern, and resections involving the uncinate fasciculus were a notable outlier, underscoring the need for systematic subcortical tract mapping.

Conclusion: Awake craniotomy with DES remains the gold standard for preserving language. Early deficits are common but predominantly transient, and reported deficit rates appear closely associated with the timing of assessment. Persistent deficits assessed at ≥ 3 months were low in most studies, although rates varied considerably with the outcome measure used and with subcortical tract involvement. Subcortical tract involvement warrants systematic mapping. We advocate for the global adoption of standardised perioperative linguistic protocols to improve data comparability.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420261342690

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-026-00452-8.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data and to no code of its authors: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• figshare:34965003, at figshare; found in DataCite

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 12 November 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 4 keywords, 23 references.

Cite

This paper

Nassor, M., Mousazadeh, P., Bramhall, M., Sanaulla, M., Martini, E., Yacoub, A., & Egunjobi, O. (2026). Beyond the cortex, early deficits, late recovery: a systematic review of language outcomes and subcortical mapping after awake craniotomy for diffuse gliomas. Chinese neurosurgical journal, 12(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-026-00452-8

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.7759/cureus.105487 [code]

A Systematic Review of Native Languages Mapped With Direct Electrical Stimulation During Awake Craniotomy.

Journal: Cureus

In common: other condition, 2 references

[2] doi:10.1172/jci.insight.194582

Daily locomotor activity declines with tumor growth and disease progression in glioblastoma.

Journal: JCI insight

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[3] doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09460-7 [code]

Rewiring of cortical glucose metabolism fuels human brain cancer growth.

Journal: Nature

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[4] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf157 [code]

Low-grade gliomas do not grow along white matter tracts: evidence from quantitative imaging.

Journal: Brain communications

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[5] doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1264322 [code]

The involvement of brain regions associated with lower KPS and shorter survival time predicts a poor prognosis in glioma.

Journal: Frontiers in neurology

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1016/j.cpt.2023.11.006

Intraoperative glioblastoma surgery-current challenges and clinical trials: An update.

Journal: Cancer pathogenesis and therapy

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.3390/diagnostics12123216 [code]

Deep Learning Classifies Low- and High-Grade Glioma Patients with High Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity Based on Their Brain White Matter Networks Derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1364/boe.513877

Brain tumor grading diagnosis using transfer learning based on optical coherence tomography.

Journal: Biomedical optics express

In common: clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.3390/cancers18132092

TGFB2 as a Prognostic Biomarker Associated with Myeloid-Enriched, Multi-Checkpoint-Activated Immunosuppression in Diffuse Glioma: A Multi-Cohort Transcriptomic Study.

Journal: Cancers

In common: other condition, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1186/s40478-026-02269-z

Histological grade 2 and non-contrast-enhancing phenotype provide prognostic information complementary to DNA methylation classification in TERTp-mutant molecular glioblastomas.

Journal: Acta neuropathologica communications

In common: other condition, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.