Hierarchical two-stage ensemble of dilated U-net models for brain tumor segmentation.

Overview

1. Laboratory of Quality Management of Scientific Research and Scientific Marketing, National Scientific Center “Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine”, Hryhoriia Skovorody,Kharkiv Region Kharkiv 61023, Ukraine

Abstract

Ensemble methods for image segmentation improve performance by combining predictions from multiple models, yielding more accurate and reliable results. This study presents a two-stage hierarchical framework to enhance the accuracy and stability of brain tumor delineation in magnetic resonance imaging data. The proposed approach integrates ensemble strategies at different stages of the processing pipeline. The architecture operates in two stages: first, sub-ensembles resolve internal inconsistencies through simple averaging; second, their outputs are fused into a final prediction using union-based aggregation. The method was evaluated on the Figshare brain tumor dataset and demonstrated progressive performance improvements from individual models to the final hierarchical ensemble. The proposed approach achieved a Dice coefficient of 94.50% and an intersection over union of 89.91%, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods. The statistical significance of these improvements was confirmed using one-way analysis of variance across three experimental groups, followed by post hoc pairwise testing. The proposed architecture preserves high fidelity in delineating diffuse tumor boundaries and complex morphological structures. By decomposing the ensemble process into two stages, the framework effectively reduces stochastic errors typical of single-model predictions, resulting in a more robust and stable segmentation system that performs reliably even in cases with low contrast and complex tissue interfaces.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• figshare:1512427, at figshare; found in the references

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/riggelllll/Brain-Tumor-Segmentation-Ensemble.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 1 author, 5 keywords, 40 references.

Cite

This paper

Koniukhov, V. (2026). Hierarchical two-stage ensemble of dilated U-net models for brain tumor segmentation. Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-026-00230-4

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3390/diagnostics16172806

Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading on MRI Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark-Driven Comparative Analysis.

Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: methods / tools, other condition, 6 references

[2] doi:10.3389/fgene.2026.1814786

Global-local feature fusion: a robust hybrid deep learning model for multiclass brain tumor classification with Grad-CAM++ interpretation.

Journal: Frontiers in genetics

In common: figshare 1512427, other condition, 4 references

[3] doi:10.3390/diagnostics16152407

BG-YOLO11s: Boundary-Guided YOLO11 with Bézier Contour Augmentation for Brain Tumour Segmentation in T1-CE MRI.

Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: figshare 1512427, methods / tools, other condition, 1 reference

[4] doi:10.3390/jcm15145508

Region-Wise Bézier Intensity Augmentation for Domain-Generalized Brain Tumor Segmentation with a Mamba U-Net.

Journal: Journal of clinical medicine

In common: figshare 1512427, methods / tools, other condition, 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1186/s40708-026-00303-3 [code]

BrainFusionNet: a deep learning and XAI model to understand local, global, and sequential features of MRI images for improved brain tumour detection.

Journal: Brain informatics

In common: figshare 1512427, methods / tools, other condition, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.3390/brainsci16050468

Advancing Brain Tumor Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review on Methodological Approaches to Glioma Segmentation and Classification Through Multiparametric MRI.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: figshare 1512427, other condition, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1155/ijbi/5318118

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using U-Net With ResNet50 Encoder for Enhanced MRI Analysis.

Journal: International journal of biomedical imaging

In common: methods / tools, other condition, 3 references

[8] doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111745

Brain Tumor Classification and Segmentation in MR Images Using EfficientNet and U-Net++ Models.

Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: figshare 1512427, methods / tools, other condition

[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346821

LHW-Net: An ensemble-based machine learning framework for brain tumor classification.

Journal: PloS one

In common: figshare 1512427, methods / tools, other condition

[10] doi:10.2196/78300

Deep Learning for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval in Picture Archiving and Communication Systems for Brain Tumor Detection: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Journal: JMIR medical informatics

In common: figshare 1512427, methods / tools, other condition

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.