OSCR

In vivo efficacy of current stimuli computed by optimal tracking of neuron membrane voltage.

Overview

Authors: Alexandra C Ferguson1, Damon A Miller2, John Jellies3, Michael Ellinger1, Melinda E Koelling4, Cindy L Linn3
ORCID iDs: Damon A Miller
  1. Formerly with 2
  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America
  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America
  4. Department of Mathematics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America
Institutions: Western Michigan University (United States)
Journal: PloS one, volume 21, issue 4, article e0345922
Dates: received 6 February 2025; accepted 12 March 2026; published online 29 April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345922 · PMID 42054412 · PMCID PMC13128133 · OpenAlex W7158590318
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: other (organism), clinical / translational (subfield)
MeSH: Cell Membrane*, Membrane Potentials*, Neurons*, Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Leeches, Models, Neurological (* major topic)
Topic: Ion channel regulation and function (Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Western Michigan University College of Arts and Sciences (Interdisciplinary Research Initiative Award); Michigan Space Grant Consortium (Fellowships); Western Michigan University (Graduate Student Research Grant); National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 61 references in the paper

Abstract

We describe an application of optimal control theory to in vivo intracellular stimulation of pressure-sensitive mechanosensory (P-cell) neurons of the leech Hirudo verbana. The control objective seeks optimal stimuli that balance the minimization of stimulation current energy and the error of tracking an action potential evoked by a high-energy rectangular pulse. Tracking a known neuron response mitigates controllability and numerical solution issues and avoids the need to constrain stimulation currents. The reduced second-order neuron conductance model used in optimization was not fit to the target P-cell, but parameters were instead selected based on an assumed saddle-node on invariant circle bifurcation. Optimal stimuli that provided a range of tracking performance and energy minimization were computed prior to experimental work. Remarkably, simulated and biological neurons show the same tracking performance decrease at higher levels of stimulus current energy reduction. Numerical analysis of neuron model responses to optimal current perturbations revealed a phase space separatrix between regions with and without action potential trajectories, demonstrating high sensitivity to optimal current shape in a high-energy reduction case and verifying local optimality. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that a control strategy based on reproducing action potential shapes can compute reduced-energy current stimulation waveforms that are effective in biological neurons. This effectiveness may extend to other biological neurons since the optimization method was applied to the same reduced-order model for other bifurcations and to a six-dimensional neuron. This method may be useful in research and future clinical applications, particularly as technological advances expand intracellular stimulation to applications previously limited to less effective extracellular methods. The high sensitivity of the neuron response to the optimal current waveform shapes could be useful in drug discovery, neuron disease diagnosis, toxin identification, and provide insights into neuron dynamics.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

figshare 25241503

License: CC-BY-4.0
State: the link answers, verified on 30 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Data Availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 30 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 30 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability

All software and experimental data needed to reproduce paper results are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25241503.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 8 MeSH terms, 4 funders, 48 references.

Cite

This paper

Ferguson, A. C., Miller, D. A., Jellies, J., Ellinger, M., Koelling, M. E., & Linn, C. L. (2026). In vivo efficacy of current stimuli computed by optimal tracking of neuron membrane voltage. PloS one, 21(4), e0345922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345922

BibTeX

@article{ferguson2026vivo,
author = {Ferguson, Alexandra C and Miller, Damon A and Jellies, John and Ellinger, Michael and Koelling, Melinda E and Linn, Cindy L},
title = {{In vivo efficacy of current stimuli computed by optimal tracking of neuron membrane voltage}},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {21},
number = {4},
pages = {e0345922},
publisher = {PLOS},
issn = {1932-6203},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0345922},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345922},
pmid = {42054412},
pmcid = {PMC13128133}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Ferguson, Alexandra C
AU - Miller, Damon A
AU - Jellies, John
AU - Ellinger, Michael
AU - Koelling, Melinda E
AU - Linn, Cindy L
TI - In vivo efficacy of current stimuli computed by optimal tracking of neuron membrane voltage
T2 - PloS one
J2 - PLoS One
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/29
VL - 21
IS - 4
SP - e0345922
SN - 1932-6203
PB - PLOS
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0345922
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345922
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1371/journal.pone.0345922",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "In vivo efficacy of current stimuli computed by optimal tracking of neuron membrane voltage",
"container-title": "PloS one",
"author": [
{
"family": "Ferguson",
"given": "Alexandra C"
},
{
"family": "Miller",
"given": "Damon A"
},
{
"family": "Jellies",
"given": "John"
},
{
"family": "Ellinger",
"given": "Michael"
},
{
"family": "Koelling",
"given": "Melinda E"
},
{
"family": "Linn",
"given": "Cindy L"
}
],
"container-title-short": "PLoS One",
"volume": "21",
"issue": "4",
"page": "e0345922",
"DOI": "10.1371/journal.pone.0345922",
"PMID": "42054412",
"PMCID": "PMC13128133",
"ISSN": "1932-6203",
"publisher": "PLOS",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345922",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
29
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1007/s10439-026-04209-3 [code]
Enhancement of Cerebral Oxygenation by Lower-Limb Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Stroke Survivors.
Journal: Annals of biomedical engineering
In common: clinical / translational, 2 references
[2] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116918
Batrachotoxin-sensitive sodium channels in toxic birds challenge "target mutation" strategy of toxin autoresistance.
Journal: iScience
In common: other, 1 reference
[3] doi:10.7554/elife.110588 [code]
Opening the black box toward a modular approach to spike sorting.
Journal: eLife
In common: 1 reference
[4] doi:10.1038/s41565-026-02180-7 [code]
Intracellular neuronal recordings across DNA tiles.
Journal: Nature nanotechnology
In common: 1 reference
[5] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43151-1 [code]
Stabilizing fractional dynamical networks suppresses epileptic seizures.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: 1 reference
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73032-0 [code]
Fast efficient coding and sensory adaptation in gain-adaptive recurrent networks.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 1 reference
[7] doi:10.7554/elife.101277 [code]
Endogenous precision of the number sense.
Journal: eLife
In common: 1 reference
[8] doi:10.3390/brainsci16080882 [code]
How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: other, clinical / translational
[9] doi:10.1080/01652176.2026.2696026
Canine brain imaging with a new low-field portable (0.05 T) MRI scanner: a pilot <i>in vivo</i> comparison to conventional 1.5 T.
Journal: The veterinary quarterly
In common: other, clinical / translational
[10] doi:10.1242/bio.062604 [code]
Cat brains age like humans: translating time shows pet cats live to be natural models for human aging.
Journal: Biology open
In common: other, clinical / translational

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.