OSCR

Improving confidence in MRI-based auto-segmentation via uncertainty assessment.

Overview

  1. Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Institutions: Aarhus University Hospital (Denmark)
Journal: Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), volume 65, article 45685
Dates: received 10 March 2026; accepted 22 April 2026; published online 11 May 2026
Type: Brief report · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685 · PMID 42109077 · PMCID PMC13173403 · OpenAlex W7160866866
Open access: diamond, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request
Categories: structural MRI / diffusion (modality), human (organism), methods / tools (subfield)
Methods: Statistics, Machine learning, Connectivity
Keywords: Deep learning, image segmentation, magnetic resonance imaging, uncertainty, calibration, radiotherapy planning, computer-assisted, brain neoplasms
MeSH: Brain Neoplasms*, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*, Magnetic Resonance Imaging*, Organs at Risk*, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted*, Calibration, Convolutional Neural Networks, Deep Learning, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Uncertainty (* major topic)
Topic: Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (Radiation, Physics and Astronomy), according to OpenAlex
Citations: cited by 2 papers (Europe PMC); 14 references in the paper

Abstract

Background and purpose: Accurate delineation of organs of interest (OOIs, also commonly referred to as organs at risk, OARs) is crucial for safe radiotherapy. While deep learning-based segmentation using convolutional neural networks has achieved high geometric accuracy, clinical translation is hindered by overconfident, uncalibrated predictions in anatomically ambiguous regions. Uncertainty quantification and model calibration are prerequisites for safe clinical workflows. This study compared the standard nnU-Netv2 against its residual-encoding variant (ResEncM), hypothesizing that ResEncM would demonstrate superior reliability and calibration while maintaining comparable geometric accuracy.

Patient/material and methods: T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI scans from 70 brain cancer patients were used (55 training/validation, 15 testing). Ground-truth contours for brainstem, hippocampi, chiasm, optic nerves, optic tracts, and pituitary were delineated per Danish Neuro Oncology Group guidelines. Both architectures were trained using five-fold cross-validation with identical preprocessing. Epistemic uncertainty was quantified using mutual information, and Expected Calibration Error (ECE) was computed within a 10-mm isotropic margin around reference contours.

Results: Both models achieved high geometric accuracy (brainstem dice similarity coefficient [DSC] > 0.93, hippocampi DSC > 0.81). No significant geometric differences were found for large structures. ResEncM showed significantly lower DSC for the pituitary (p = 0.003) and chiasm (p = 0.018). However, ResEncM demonstrated significantly lower epistemic uncertainty and ensemble variance across all structures (p < 0.05), and significantly reduced ECE for the optic chiasm, optic tracts, and pituitary.

Interpretation: Integrating a deep residual encoder into the standard U-Net framework significantly improves reliability and calibration of automated brain OOI contours while maintaining strong geometric performance. The ResEncM architecture provides a more trustworthy tool for clinical radiotherapy by reliably flagging high-uncertainty voxels, supporting confidence-aware clinical workflows.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The clinical datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy and institutional data protection policies. However, the trained segmentation models and the evaluation scripts used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 3 authors, 8 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 10 references.

Cite

This paper

Kallehauge, J. F., Ren, J., & Lassen-Ramshad, Y. (2026). Improving confidence in MRI-based auto-segmentation via uncertainty assessment. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 65, 45685. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685

BibTeX

@article{kallehauge2026improving,
author = {Kallehauge, Jesper Folsted and Ren, Jintao and Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin},
title = {{Improving confidence in MRI-based auto-segmentation via uncertainty assessment}},
journal = {Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {65},
pages = {45685},
publisher = {MJS Publishing},
issn = {0284-186X},
doi = {10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685},
pmid = {42109077},
pmcid = {PMC13173403}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Kallehauge, Jesper Folsted
AU - Ren, Jintao
AU - Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin
TI - Improving confidence in MRI-based auto-segmentation via uncertainty assessment
T2 - Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
J2 - Acta Oncol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/11
VL - 65
SP - 45685
SN - 0284-186X
PB - MJS Publishing
DO - 10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685
UR - https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Improving confidence in MRI-based auto-segmentation via uncertainty assessment",
"container-title": "Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kallehauge",
"given": "Jesper Folsted"
},
{
"family": "Ren",
"given": "Jintao"
},
{
"family": "Lassen-Ramshad",
"given": "Yasmin"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Acta Oncol",
"volume": "65",
"page": "45685",
"DOI": "10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685",
"PMID": "42109077",
"PMCID": "PMC13173403",
"ISSN": "0284-186X",
"publisher": "MJS Publishing",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45685",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
11
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3390/s26154963
NeuroSPFNet: Vision-Language Semantic Prior-Guided Frequency-Enhanced Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multimodal MRI.
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[2] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-48496-1 [code]
A unified FLAIR hyperintensity segmentation model for various CNS tumor types and acquisition time points.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[3] doi:10.3390/diagnostics16172806
Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading on MRI Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark-Driven Comparative Analysis.
Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[4] doi:10.21037/qims-2026-0792 [code]
An nnU-Net-based framework with adaptive feature representation for 3D brain tumor segmentation.
Journal: Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
In common: methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[5] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1323 [code]
SUITPy: A Python-based toolbox for the analysis of cerebellar functional and anatomical imaging data across the human lifespan.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: methods / tools, 2 references
[6] doi:10.1186/s12911-026-03551-9
A multi-sequence MRI integration framework using SwinUNETR-v2 for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.
Journal: BMC medical informatics and decision making
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[7] doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2026.104007 [code]
A comparative study of deep learning for cortical lesion MRI segmentation with explainability analysis in multiple sclerosis.
Journal: NeuroImage. Clinical
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[8] doi:10.1186/s41747-026-00735-w [code]
Dual-conditioned diffusion model with anatomical guidance for geometric distortion correction in prostate MRI.
Journal: European radiology experimental
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[9] doi:10.1364/boe.600665 [code]
NeuroSeg-MF: robust neuron segmentation in two-photon Ca&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; imaging using multi-feature fusion and detection-guided SAM.
Journal: Biomedical optics express
In common: methods / tools, 2 references
[10] doi:10.1002/mrm.70488 [code]
Advancing the Volumetric Analysis of Ultra-Low-Field Brain MRI Using Image-to-Image Translation.
Journal: Magnetic resonance in medicine
In common: methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.