Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI.
Overview
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Abstract
Introduction: Three-dimensional assessment of fetal cortical morphology from MRI is essential for understanding early brain neurodevelopment. However, measurement can be affected by fetal imaging quality, number and selection of available stacks, and reconstruction methods.
Methods: We evaluated the within-session reliability of an automated cortical morphometry pipeline in 30 typically developing fetuses [22–36 weeks gestational age (GA)]. For each subject, two disjoint subsets of 2D T2-weighted stacks (no shared stacks) were independently reconstructed into 3D volumes using the Neural Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction (NeSVoR) and the Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction Toolkit (SVRTK). Cortical plate volume, surface area, mean sulcal depth, and absolute mean curvature were extracted, and measurement reliability was assessed using absolute percent difference (APD) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Multiple linear regression evaluated the effects of mean stack quality, quality difference between subsets, stack count, and GA on measurement reliability.
Results: NeSVoR-derived metrics showed high reliability for all measures (mean APD < 3%, ICC > 0.99). SVRTK-derived metrics were also robust (mean APD < 5%, ICC > 0.97). Reliability increased with greater stack count and older GA in NeSVoR, and with higher mean stack quality in SVRTK.
Discussion: These results demonstrate that automated cortical morphometry from fetal MRI yields highly consistent measurements of volumetric and surface metrics within the proposed within-session design, once minimum levels of image quality and stack count are met. This study proposes a within-session benchmark for automated fetal cortical measurements and underscores that systematic reliability assessment is essential for confident application of automated pipelines in fetal neuroimaging.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.
FNNDSC
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability statement
Image-processing and analysis scripts are available via the lab’s centralized GitHub (HYPERLINK https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 8 authors, 6 keywords, 2 funders, 37 references.
Cite
This paper
Jeong, S., Gondova, A., Yun, H. J., You, S., Lagunas, M., Golland, P., Grant, P. E., & Im, K. (2026). Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI. Frontiers in neuroscience, 20, 1817732. https://
BibTeX
@article{jeong2026evalua
author = {Jeong, Seungyoon and Gondova, Andrea and Yun, Hyuk Jin and You, Sungmin and Lagunas, Melquisideth and Golland, Polina and Grant, P Ellen and Im, Kiho},
title = {{Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI}},
journal = {Frontiers in neuroscience},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {20},
pages = {1817732},
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA},
issn = {1662-4548},
doi = {10.3389/
url = {https://
pmid = {42305779},
pmcid = {PMC13265515}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Jeong, Seungyoon
AU - Gondova, Andrea
AU - Yun, Hyuk Jin
AU - You, Sungmin
AU - Lagunas, Melquisideth
AU - Golland, Polina
AU - Grant, P Ellen
AU - Im, Kiho
TI - Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI
T2 - Frontiers in neuroscience
J2 - Front Neurosci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 20
SP - 1817732
SN - 1662-4548
PB - Frontiers Media SA
DO - 10.3389/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.3389/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI",
"container-title": "Frontiers in neuroscience",
"author": [
{
"family": "Jeong",
"given": "Seungyoon"
},
{
"family": "Gondova",
"given": "Andrea"
},
{
"family": "Yun",
"given": "Hyuk Jin"
},
{
"family": "You",
"given": "Sungmin"
},
{
"family": "Lagunas",
"given": "Melquisideth"
},
{
"family": "Golland",
"given": "Polina"
},
{
"family": "Grant",
"given": "P Ellen"
},
{
"family": "Im",
"given": "Kiho"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "20",
"page": "1817732",
"DOI": "10.3389/
"PMID": "42305779",
"PMCID": "PMC13265515",
"ISSN": "1662-4548",
"publisher": "Frontiers Media SA",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
1
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.64898/2026.04.01.26349523 [code]
- Developmental brain age gap in prematurity and postnatally emerging delay in congenital heart diseaseJournal: medRxiv (preprint)In common: developmental, structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
- [2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1293 [code]
- PANDA: Patch-based unsupervised deep learning for brain anomaly detection via age prediction in fetal MRI.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: developmental, structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
- [3] doi:10.1111/desc.70187 [code]
- Prenatal Volume in the Bilateral Superior Temporal Gyrus Associates With Children's Expressive Vocabulary at 24-36 Months.Journal: Developmental scienceIn common: developmental, structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
- [4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1337 [code]
- Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
- [5] doi:10.1186/s41747-026-00702-5
- MRI-based spatio-temporal atlas of ganglionic eminence.Journal: European radiology experimentalIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
- [6] doi:
- Orientation-Aware Diffusion Super-Resolution for 3T-Like Fetal MRI from Routine 1.5T Scans.Journal: Proceedings of machine learning researchIn common: developmental, structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
- [7] doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1813590
- Alterations in cortical surface morphometry in fibromyalgia: a multi-parametric study.Journal: Frontiers in psychologyIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
- [8] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1870124 [code]
- An end-to-end pipeline for automated fetal brain segmentation and biometry from 3D SSFP MRI.Journal: Frontiers in neuroscienceIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
- [9] doi:10.64898/2026.03.06.709690
- Genetic insights on the mechanisms of human cortical foldingJournal: bioRxiv (preprint)In common: 2 references
- [10] doi:10.1016/j.jmro.2026.100225 [code]
- Feasibility, image quality, and analytic usability of mobile 64 mT ultra-low-field MRI for infant brain imaging at 3 and 12 months in southern Malawi.Journal: Journal of magnetic resonance openIn common: developmental, structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 0 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:a3e265fdb62a80af…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
