Handcrafted Versus Deep Feature Extraction Methods for MRI-Based Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis.

Overview

1. Research Laboratory Modeling, Analysis and Control of Systems (MACS), National Engineering School of Gabes (ENIG), Gabes 6029, Tunisia
2. Computer Science Department, University College of Haql, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
3. Applied College, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Despite significant advances in medical image analysis, automated diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains challenging due to the complexity of 3D brain data and the variability of lesion appearance. Objective: In this work, we propose an efficient and optimized feature extraction framework for automated MS diagnosis using FLAIR, T1-, and T2-weighted MRI. The approach enhances Decimal Descriptor Patterns (DDP) by integrating local gradient information, producing a 3D texture representation that is more discriminative and expressive. Methods: The study is divided into two main parts: (i) detection of MS, and (ii) assessment of disease progression in affected patients. In each part, features are extracted from the relevant MRI data and classified using multiple classical machine learning classifiers, including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Logistic Regression. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed handcrafted feature-based approach was compared to features extracted using a deep learning-based model (vision–language model, VLM), specifically CLIP (Contrastive Language–Image Pretraining), enabling a clear comparison of their performance. To assess robustness and generalizability, two complementary validation strategies were adopted: (i) controlled experiments on the BrainWeb dataset under varying T1/T2 contrast conditions, and (ii) validation on a the real-world FLAIR MRI dataset, reflecting clinically relevant lesion visibility. Results: Gradient-DDP features achieve the best overall performance for MS progression, reaching up to 97% accuracy on T2-weighted MRI with SVM, while LDA and Logistic Regression also remain strong with accuracies around 83–96% on T2. For binary MS detection, the proposed method attains near-perfect results, with up to 99% accuracy on FLAIR (SVM/KNN) and 98% on T2-weighted images across SVM, while other classifiers also maintain high performance above 90%. Conclusions: Gradient-DDP provides strong consistency and transparency, offering an interpretable link between texture patterns and diagnostic outcomes. While VLM features perform well when lesion patterns are clearly defined (e.g., in T2), Gradient-DDP demonstrates greater robustness in more challenging modalities such as Flair, where deep representations may be less stable.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• kaggle.com/datasets/farahmo, at Kaggle; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are publicly available. BrainWeb dataset is available at https://brainweb.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/brainweb (accessed on 15 January 2026). The MS–NonMS Classification (FLAIR) dataset is available on Kaggle at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/farahmo/ms-nonms-classificationflair (accessed on 30 January 2026).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 1 funder, 24 references.

Cite

This paper

Yahia, S., Bouchrika, T., & Bouchelligua, W. (2026). Handcrafted Versus Deep Feature Extraction Methods for MRI-Based Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 16(9), 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091379

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1186/s12911-026-03551-9

A multi-sequence MRI integration framework using SwinUNETR-v2 for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Journal: BMC medical informatics and decision making

In common: multiple sclerosis, structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[2] doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001316 [code]

Reliability of a convolutional neural network in segmenting multiple sclerosis lesions from MRI: Impact of data augmentation, image modality and tolerance with U-Net architecture.

Journal: PLOS digital health

In common: multiple sclerosis, structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[3] doi:10.1155/ijbi/5318118

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using U-Net With ResNet50 Encoder for Enhanced MRI Analysis.

Journal: International journal of biomedical imaging

In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[4] doi:10.3390/diagnostics16121791

An Explainable Multi-Scale Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Class Brain MRI Classification.

Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1038/s41597-026-07421-x [code]

The Brain Imaging and Neurophysiology Dataset of large-scale multimodal neural data.

Journal: Scientific data

In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2026.104001 [code]

Effect of vascular lesion preprocessing on Brain Intensity AbNormality Classification Algorithm (BIANCA) white matter hyperintensity segmentation.

Journal: NeuroImage. Clinical

In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1186/s12938-026-01555-0 [code]

Incorporating normal periventricular changes for enhanced pathological white matter hyperintensity segmentation: on multiclass deep learning approaches.

Journal: Biomedical engineering online

In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2026.104057 [code]

Tensor-derived diffusion MRI metrics and NODDI in multiple sclerosis classification.

Journal: NeuroImage. Clinical

In common: multiple sclerosis, structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational

[9] doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1805464

Chronic low-grade inflammation, genetic susceptibility, and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective cohort study.

Journal: Frontiers in immunology

In common: multiple sclerosis, structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational

[10] doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106438

Brain network biomarkers for diagnosis and clinical stratification in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study integrating individualised structural covariance MRI with high-density EEG.

Journal: EBioMedicine

In common: multiple sclerosis, structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.