OSCR

Eccentricity Constrains Spatial Working Memory Fidelity: Evidence for the Cortical Maps Hypothesis.

Overview

  1. Department of Psychology, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LE, (A.M.)
Institutions: Durham University (United Kingdom)
Journal: Vision (Basel, Switzerland), volume 10, issue 3, article 44
Dates: received 11 June 2026; accepted 16 July 2026; published online 17 July 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.3390/vision10030044 · PMID 42496489 · PMCID PMC13398193 · OpenAlex W7169627333
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Statistics
Keywords: memory, spatial, eccentricity, precision, working memory
Topic: Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P000762/1)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 75 references in the paper

Abstract

Spatial working memory (SWM) has been characterised as a flexible resource that determines the precision with which memoranda are stored. The ‘cortical map’ proposal predicts that resource allocation, and therefore mnemonic precision, is limited by the availability of cortical space to represent memoranda. This hypothesis was tested using a continuous spatial localisation task in which memory items were presented at three eccentricities and set sizes of 1–8. Localisation error increased systematically with eccentricity, as predicted by the cortical maps hypothesis. Mixture-modelling analyses indicated that the eccentricity effect was primarily driven by increases in imprecision at small set sizes (set sizes 1–5). In contrast, when set size exceeded five items, guessing made an increasingly important contribution to localisation error, suggesting that representations of peripheral locations become more vulnerable to memory failure under high memory loads. Misbinding errors were most prominent for locations nearest fixation, likely reflecting reduced inter-item spacing at small eccentricities. Stimuli were not scaled to compensate for cortical magnification, but the observed increase in imprecision closely matched predictions derived from a cortical magnification function. Together, these findings support the cortical maps hypothesis and indicate that spatial working memory representations compete for limited representational resources within the spatial maps that guide action.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in OSF at https://osf.io/y864x/ (accessed on 15 July 2026).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 1 funder, 71 references.

Cite

This paper

McAteer, S. M., McGregor, A., & Smith, D. T. (2026). Eccentricity Constrains Spatial Working Memory Fidelity: Evidence for the Cortical Maps Hypothesis. Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 10(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10030044

BibTeX

@article{mcateer2026eccentricity,
author = {McAteer, Siobhan M and McGregor, Anthony and Smith, Daniel T},
title = {{Eccentricity Constrains Spatial Working Memory Fidelity: Evidence for the Cortical Maps Hypothesis}},
journal = {Vision (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {44},
publisher = {Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)},
issn = {2411-5150},
doi = {10.3390/vision10030044},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10030044},
pmid = {42496489},
pmcid = {PMC13398193}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - McAteer, Siobhan M
AU - McGregor, Anthony
AU - Smith, Daniel T
TI - Eccentricity Constrains Spatial Working Memory Fidelity: Evidence for the Cortical Maps Hypothesis
T2 - Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
J2 - Vision (Basel)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/17
VL - 10
IS - 3
SP - 44
SN - 2411-5150
PB - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
DO - 10.3390/vision10030044
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10030044
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.3390/vision10030044",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Eccentricity Constrains Spatial Working Memory Fidelity: Evidence for the Cortical Maps Hypothesis",
"container-title": "Vision (Basel, Switzerland)",
"author": [
{
"family": "McAteer",
"given": "Siobhan M"
},
{
"family": "McGregor",
"given": "Anthony"
},
{
"family": "Smith",
"given": "Daniel T"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Vision (Basel)",
"volume": "10",
"issue": "3",
"page": "44",
"DOI": "10.3390/vision10030044",
"PMID": "42496489",
"PMCID": "PMC13398193",
"ISSN": "2411-5150",
"publisher": "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10030044",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
17
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aea7764 [code]
Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception.
Journal: Science advances
In common: cognitive, 8 references
[2] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag058 [code]
Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: cognitive, 6 references
[3] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01443-z
The oblique effect in visual working memory is enhanced by distraction, regardless of tDCS manipulations.
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: cognitive, 6 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10071-9 [code]
Alpha phase coding supports feature binding during working memory maintenance.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: cognitive, 6 references
[5] doi:10.1111/ejn.70528 [code]
Dorsal Posterior Parietal Cortex Lesions Disrupt Spatial- but Not Motor-Based Inhibition.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1034 [code]
Top-down selection of visual working memory contents is supported by alpha-band phase-synchronized oscillatory networks
Journal: n/a
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73916-1 [code]
Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: cognitive, 1 reference
[8] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag067 [code]
Language laterality and cognitive skills: does anatomy matter?
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: cognitive, 1 reference
[9] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75705-2 [code]
Redundant prefrontal hemispheres adapt storage strategy to working memory demands.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: cognitive, 1 reference
[10] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003779 [code]
Past and present goals are represented concurrently during visual search.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: cognitive, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.