OSCR

Notch mediated lateral inhibition is shaped by morphological differences to reinforce bias toward signal-sending or receiving roles

Code ↔ Paper

8 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 8 matches · 1 of them tie a paragraph to a whole file without given lines: a weak match, whose lines are not tinted
  1. [1] § Results › A bias in apical size prefigures transcriptional onset within clusters ↔ MultivariateModels.ipynb, lines 30 to 39 · score 0.69 · logistic regression, random forests, multivariate models, splits, classification · Report a mismatch
  2. [2] § Materials & Methods › Quantification and Statistical Analysis › Area fold-change analysis ↔ FoldChangeNCAreas.ipynb, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.66 · Fold change, transcribing NCs, 2.5 min, apical area, windows · Report a mismatch
  3. [3] § Materials & Methods › Quantification and Statistical Analysis › Modelling ↔ ImposedPerimeter/RunImposedPerimeterModel.m, lines 15 to 59 · score 0.62 · inhibiting activator expression, Hill coefficients, Notch, spl · Report a mismatch
  4. [4] § Materials & Methods › Quantification and Statistical Analysis › Modelling ↔ ImposedPerimeter/RunImposedPerimeterModel.m, lines 15 to 59 · score 0.59 · Hill coefficients, Hill function, Delta, inhibiting, thresholds, Activated · Report a mismatch
  5. [5] § Materials & Methods › Quantification and Statistical Analysis › Modelling ↔ SOP_DefaultParams_rho_adapted_weighted.m, lines 5 to 94 · score 0.57 · Hill coefficients, Hill function, Delta, inhibiting, thresholds, Activated · Report a mismatch
  6. [6] § Results › Lateral inhibition model incorporating cell perimeter and tension-differences can replicate signalling properties ↔ SOP_DefaultParams_rho_adapted_weighted.m, lines 5 to 94 · score 0.57 · cis inhibition, lateral inhibition, dimensional, connectivity, weighted, trans · Report a mismatch
  7. [7] § Materials & Methods › Quantification and Statistical Analysis › Cross-correlation analysis ↔ CrossCorrelationsOnCombinedData.m, lines 1 to 7 · score 0.56 · NC apical area, NB apical area, correlation, Cross, transcribing · Report a mismatch
  8. [8] § Results › Lateral inhibition model incorporating cell perimeter and tension-differences can replicate signalling properties ↔ DynamicPerimeter/IterateOverDifferentThresholdsDynamicPerimeterModelForPaper.m, lines 176 to 180 · score 0.54 · success probability, perimeter model, initial perimeter, simulation, dynamic · Report a mismatch

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser; OSCR does not store it: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

MATLAB · 166 lines · 5.1 KB · AGPL-3.0 · 2 matches

  1. % Script that runs imposed perimeter model shown in Figure 6 for a specific
  2. % parameter choice
  3. % Adapted from Troost et al., 2023
  4. %% RUN SCRIPT for SOP Weighted Lateral Inhibition Model
  5. clear; close all; clc;
  6. %% Model setup
  7. model.ratio = 'rho';
  8. model.zone = 'Gaussian-like proneural genes';
  9. %% Simulation parameters
  10. params = SOP_DefaultParams_rho_adapted_weighted(model.zone);
  11. % Lattice geometry
  12. params.P = 8; % rows
  13. params.Q = 8; % columns
  14. params.Tmax = 20; % simulation duration
  15. % Control SOP patterning
  16. % params.nSOP = 2; % number of SOPs
  17. % params.minDist = 3; % minimum distance (in graph hops)
  18. % Parameter scaling
  19. params.beta.d = 1.62; % base Delta production
  20. params.beta.E = 1.62; % base E(spl) production %%% NOTE %%%
  21. params.beta.n = 1.52; % base Notch production
  22. % Transcription and thresholds
  23. params.T.E = 0.0051; % Hill function threshold for inhibitng activator expression by E(spl)
  24. % params.c.s = 2; % Hill coefficient for promoting E(spl) expression by trans-activation signal %%% NOTE %%%
  25. params.c.E = 3; % Hill coefficient for inhibitng activator expression by E(spl) %%% NOTE %%%
  26. params.Kappa.t = 0.8; % transactivation rate
  27. params.Kappa.InhCombined = 0.4; % base cis interaction scaling %%% NOTE %%%
  28. k = params.P * params.Q;
  29. % Perimeter and delamination/enhancement
  30. rng(21)
  31. params.perimeter = 1 + 0.1.*2.*(rand(k,1) - 0.5);
  32. params.perimeter(params.SOP.cells) = 0.85; % smaller center cell
  33. params.delam.trigger = 'time'; % (default: no event)
  34. params.delam.time = 0; % (model time units) -- used if trigger='time'
  35. params.delam.E_threshold = 0.015; % (used if trigger='E', compares E > threshold)
  36. params.delam.SOP_new_perimeter = 0.05;
  37. params.delam.Ecell_new_perimeter = 1.4; %% Note: this is fold change (multiplied with p0) so the differences maintain
  38. params.delam.smooth = true; %true;
  39. params.delam.duration = 10;
  40. params.beta.A = 1.62; % base Activator production rate (1.62 in paper)
  41. params.c.s = 3; % Hill coefficient for promoting E(spl) expression by trans-activation signal
  42. params.T.s = 0.8; % Hill function threshold for promoting E(spl) expression by trans-activation signal
  43. params.cis_size_exponent = 1; % how much smaller cells increase cis inhibition
  44. params.trans_size_exponent = 3; % trans interaction scaling
  45. %% INITIAL CONDITIONS
  46. y0 = SOP_InitialConditions_rho_adapted_weighted(model.zone, params, k);
  47. %
  48. %% RUN SIMULATION
  49. fprintf('\nRunning SOP weighted lateral inhibition simulation...\n\n');
  50. [yout, tout, params] = SOP_multicell_LI_adapted_weighted_with_trigger_PerimSave(model, params, y0);
  51. %% Map model time to real seconds
  52. real_time_per_model_unit = 150; % 1 model unit = 150s
  53. t_real = tout * real_time_per_model_unit;
  54. % Optional: resample every 30 s (like your experimental frames)
  55. frame_interval = 150; % seconds
  56. t_uniform = 0:frame_interval:max(t_real);
  57. y_uniform = interp1(t_real, yout, t_uniform, 'pchip');
  58. %%
  59. figure(10); clf; hold on;
  60. tmin = t_uniform/60;
  61. SOPcells = params.SOP.cells(:);
  62. % Extract blocks
  63. D_SOP = y_uniform(:, SOPcells); % Delta
  64. DA_SOP = y_uniform(:, k + SOPcells); % Activated Delta
  65. N_SOP = y_uniform(:, 2*k + SOPcells); % Notch
  66. E_SOP = y_uniform(:, 3*k + SOPcells); % E(spl)
  67. Aac_SOP = y_uniform(:, 4*k + SOPcells); % Activator
  68. % Colors
  69. cD = [0 0.4 1];
  70. cDA = [0.1 0.7 1];
  71. cN = [0.8 0.2 0];
  72. cE = [0.6 0 0.8];
  73. cA = [0 0.6 0];
  74. % Plot mean ± SEM
  75. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, D_SOP, cD, 'Delta');
  76. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, DA_SOP, cDA, 'Activated Delta');
  77. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, N_SOP, cN, 'Notch');
  78. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, E_SOP, cE, 'E(spl)');
  79. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, Aac_SOP, cA, 'Activator');
  80. legend('Location','best');
  81. xlabel('Time (min)');
  82. ylabel('Level (mean ± SD)');
  83. title('SOP cells');
  84. xlim([0 max(tmin)]);
  85. ylim([0 1.8]);
  86. saveas(figure(10),'NB_levels.pdf')
  87. %%
  88. figure(12); clf; hold on;
  89. NNcells = params.SOP.nearest_neighbors(:);
  90. % Extract blocks
  91. D_NN = y_uniform(:, NNcells);
  92. DA_NN = y_uniform(:, k + NNcells);
  93. N_NN = y_uniform(:, 2*k + NNcells);
  94. E_NN = y_uniform(:, 3*k + NNcells);
  95. Aac_NN = y_uniform(:, 4*k + NNcells);
  96. % Plot mean ± SEM
  97. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, D_NN, cD, 'Delta');
  98. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, DA_NN, cDA, 'Activated Delta');
  99. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, N_NN, cN, 'Notch');
  100. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, E_NN, cE, 'E(spl)');
  101. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, Aac_NN, cA, 'Activator');
  102. legend('Location','best');
  103. xlabel('Time (min)');
  104. ylabel('Level (mean ± SD)');
  105. title('Nearest neighbour cells');
  106. xlim([0 max(tmin)]);
  107. ylim([0 1.8]);
  108. saveas(figure(12),'NN_levels.pdf')
  109. %%
  110. figure(14); clf; hold on;
  111. % Plot mean ± SEM
  112. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, E_SOP, 'g', 'E(spl) SOP');
  113. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, E_NN, 'b', 'E(spl) NN');
  114. legend('Location','best');
  115. xlabel('Time (min)');
  116. ylabel('Level (mean ± SD)');
  117. title('E(spl) levels');
  118. xlim([0 max(tmin)]);
  119. ylim([0 0.15]);
  120. % hold on
  121. % x1 =[5 5];
  122. % y1 = [0 0.25];
  123. % plot(x1,y1,'--k')
  124. saveas(figure(14),'E_levels.pdf')
  125. figure; hold on
  126. yyaxis right
  127. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, E_SOP, 'g', 'E(spl) SOP');
  128. shadedMeanPlot(tmin, E_NN, 'b', 'E(spl) NN');
  129. ylim([0 0.18])
  130. yyaxis left
  131. ylim([0 1.6])
  132. saveas(figure,'E_levels_and_perimeters.pdf')

RunImposedPerimeterModel.m at commit 10955e7, under AGPL-3.0 · at the source

Overview

Authors: Prachi Richa1, Charalambos Roussos1, Chengxi Zhu2, Martin O. Lenz2, Shahar Kasirer3, David Sprinzak4, Sarah Bray1
  1. Department of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, and University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DY
  2. Cambridge Advanced Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DY
  3. School of Physics and Astronomy, and Biochemistry and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
  4. School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
Institutions: University of Cambridge (United Kingdom); Tel Aviv University (Israel)
Dates: published online 28 March 2026
Type: Preprint
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.64898/2026.03.27.712410 · OpenAlex W7141848586
Open access: green, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: cellular / molecular (subfield)
Methods: Preprocessing, Statistics, Machine learning, Evoked potentials, fMRI & imaging
Topic: Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Wellcome Trust (212936/Z/18/Z)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 44 references in the paper

Abstract

During neurogenesis, neuroblasts are selected from proneural-competent cells through lateral inhibition, a process controlled by the evolutionarily conserved Notch signalling pathway. By tracking transcription from Notch-target genes and cell morphologies in real time, we discovered that the presumptive neuroblast never initiates target-gene transcription. This implies a pre-existing bias directs Notch signalling. The bias correlates with a heterogeneity in apical cell areas which is further reinforced during neuroblast selection. Additionally, the length and duration of neuroblast-neighbour cell contacts predict the likelihood of transcription. Using mathematical modelling we show that lateral inhibition seeded with subtle morphological differences can bias cells toward signal-sending or receiving roles before transcriptional feedback occurs. Notch activation further alters apical cell area, reinforcing the initial bias. We propose that signalling and cell mechanics work together to ensure the robust selection of a single neural precursor.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 8 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

crou607/neurogenesis_analysis

License: AGPL-3.0
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: 10955e7fc55709e180c1b6e4711ac2800f277a3e, 9 June 2026
Languages: MATLAB (18), Jupyter (8)
Size: 28 files, 26 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Data and code availability”
Holds: README, license file, 8 notebooks
Not found: CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: Matplotlib (8 files), pandas (8 files), NumPy (5 files), seaborn (5 files), Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox (4 files), scikit-learn (4 files), SciPy (4 files), Violinplot-Matlab (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers
28 files

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 26 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 8 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and code availability

All code used for the above-mentioned analyses and modelling can be found at: https://github.com/crou607/neurogenesis_analysis.git

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, journal, dates, 7 authors, 1 funder, 44 references.

Cite

This paper

Richa, P., Roussos, C., Zhu, C., Lenz, M. O., Kasirer, S., Sprinzak, D., & Bray, S. (2026). Notch mediated lateral inhibition is shaped by morphological differences to reinforce bias toward signal-sending or receiving roles. bioRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410

BibTeX

@article{richa2026notch,
author = {Richa, Prachi and Roussos, Charalambos and Zhu, Chengxi and Lenz, Martin O. and Kasirer, Shahar and Sprinzak, David and Bray, Sarah},
title = {{Notch mediated lateral inhibition is shaped by morphological differences to reinforce bias toward signal-sending or receiving roles}},
journal = {bioRxiv (preprint)},
year = {2026},
month = mar,
publisher = {bioRxiv},
issn = {2692-8205},
doi = {10.64898/2026.03.27.712410},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Richa, Prachi
AU - Roussos, Charalambos
AU - Zhu, Chengxi
AU - Lenz, Martin O.
AU - Kasirer, Shahar
AU - Sprinzak, David
AU - Bray, Sarah
TI - Notch mediated lateral inhibition is shaped by morphological differences to reinforce bias toward signal-sending or receiving roles
T2 - bioRxiv (preprint)
J2 - bioRxiv
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/28
SN - 2692-8205
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.03.27.712410
UR - https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.64898/2026.03.27.712410",
"type": "article",
"title": "Notch mediated lateral inhibition is shaped by morphological differences to reinforce bias toward signal-sending or receiving roles",
"container-title": "bioRxiv (preprint)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Richa",
"given": "Prachi"
},
{
"family": "Roussos",
"given": "Charalambos"
},
{
"family": "Zhu",
"given": "Chengxi"
},
{
"family": "Lenz",
"given": "Martin O."
},
{
"family": "Kasirer",
"given": "Shahar"
},
{
"family": "Sprinzak",
"given": "David"
},
{
"family": "Bray",
"given": "Sarah"
}
],
"container-title-short": "bioRxiv",
"DOI": "10.64898/2026.03.27.712410",
"ISSN": "2692-8205",
"publisher": "bioRxiv",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
3,
28
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.041 [code]
Notch-mediated lateral inhibition is shaped by morphological differences to reinforce bias toward signal-sending or -receiving roles.
Journal: Current biology : CB
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools, cellular / molecular, 20 references, 2 authors
[2] doi:10.1073/pnas.2205371120 [code]
Neighbor-specific gene expression revealed from physically interacting cells during mouse embryonic development.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, 2 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72935-2 [code]
Spindle neurons in human cortex possess distinctive firing properties and transcriptomic signatures.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools, cellular / molecular
[4] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003915 [code]
Noise-invariant representations of sound emerge along the canonical cortical hierarchy.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools
[5] doi:10.1016/j.patter.2026.101590 [code]
Density-based longitudinal neuron tracking in high-density electrophysiological recordings.
Journal: Patterns (New York, N.Y.)
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71270-w [code]
Spatiotemporal dynamics of the human cortical functional hierarchy across the lifespan.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools
[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71151-2 [code]
Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction processing and theory of mind in narratives.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools
[8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68711-x [code]
Neural and computational mechanisms underlying one-shot perceptual learning in humans.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools
[9] doi:10.64898/2026.01.30.702777 [code]
DeepUnitMatch: tracking neurons across days in electrophysiology using Deep Neural Networks
Journal: bioRxiv (preprint)
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools
[10] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-68240-z [code]
Map-like representations of emotion knowledge in hippocampal-prefrontal systems.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Violinplot-Matlab, seaborn, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 other tools

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Add the badge to the code's README

OSCR: the badge of this paper

If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.

Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->
reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end
HTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.64898/2026.03.27.712410.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

On GitHub, open the README, choose Edit (the pencil), paste the snippet under the title, then "Commit changes".

If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Versions of its code: the releases of its code tied to a version of this paper (the preprint, the accepted manuscript, the version of record…), each with the tracing map versioned with it.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.