Phase-targeted modulation of essential tremor with transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex

Overview

1. MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
2. Oxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
3. MRC Centre of Research Excellence in Restorative Neural Dynamics, United Kingdom
4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
5. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
6. Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Academic Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
7. Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
8. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
9. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Neural oscillations provide temporal frameworks for coordinating communication within and across distributed brain networks. In essential tremor (ET), pathological synchronization within the cerebello–thalamo–cortical circuit produces rhythmic activity that manifests as an involuntary action tremor. Although deep brain stimulation can effectively suppress tremor, its invasiveness and cost highlight the need for non-invasive interventions capable of selectively modulating pathological oscillations.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offers a non-invasive means of engaging cortical circuits, yet conventional stimulation protocols are delivered independently of the ongoing neural dynamics. Such open-loop approaches ignore the temporal structure of tremor-related activity, potentially stimulating during both amplifying and suppressing phases of the oscillation. To address this, we compared two phase-targeted TMS paradigms: first-pulse phase-locked TMS (First-pulse -TMS), in which only the initial pulse of a stimulation train is aligned to the tremor phase, and cycle-by-cycle phase-locked TMS (Continuous-TMS), in which each pulse is continuously triggered based on real-time tremor phase.

Ten patients with ET underwent stimulation guided by peripheral tremor recordings using an accelerometer, with tremor phase estimated in real time via the Oscilltrack algorithm. Sixty-four trains of TMS pulses were delivered at nine discrete phase bins of the tremor cycle, such that each phase bin was repeated approximately seven times. Continuous-TMS maintained accurate phase-locking across consecutive cycles (mean phase-locking value ~0.9), whereas First-pulse-TMS exhibited progressive drift over time and low phase consistency (mean phase-locking value <0.2). The circular concentration of stimulation phase was significantly greater for Continuous-TMS than First-pulse-TMS (Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.001), indicating a significant difference in overall phase-locking accuracy between the two protocols. Critically, Continuous-TMS, unlike First-pulse-TMS, induced bidirectional, phase-dependent modulation of tremor amplitude. Circular-linear modelling revealed a sinusoidal relationship between stimulation phase and changes in tremor amplitude, with tremor amplification and suppression occurring at opposite phases of the cycle. Covariates including baseline tremor amplitude and trial number were accounted for. In some people, tremor suppression outlasted the stimulation period, suggesting phase-locked TMS may be a potentially useful therapeutic tool.

By enabling reliable, phase-specific stimulation of the tremor cycle, Continuous-TMS allows identification of the individual phase that produces maximal tremor suppression, supporting the development of personalized, phase-specific neuromodulation strategies. This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that temporally precise, closed-loop TMS can interact with pathological oscillations in real time, providing a mechanistic framework for probing oscillatory contributions to motor symptoms and a scalable therapeutic approach for ET and other oscillopathies.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability

The dataset of this paper (https://doi.org/10.60964/rnd-0qp8-9458) is not yet openly available, as it is being used in ongoing projects. We welcome enquires for sharing this as part of a collaboration, please contact . Code highlighting key analysis will be made available on acceptance.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, journal, dates, 18 authors, 6 keywords, 1 funder, 32 references.

Cite

This paper

Mancini, V., Grennan, I., Shackle, N., Vasaturo-Kolodner, T., Sharma, P., Siekmann, A., Kundieko, S., Ferrandes, F., Biller, L., Wendt, K., Ali, K., Rogers, D., Sarangmat, N., Oswal, A., Denison, T., Cagnan, H., Sharott, A., & Stagg, C. J. (2026). Phase-targeted modulation of essential tremor with transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.11.26347791

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106293 [code]

Dynamic neural states underpin motor symptom severity in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal analysis of chronic cortico-subthalamic nucleus recordings.

Journal: EBioMedicine

In common: author Ashwini Oswal

[2] doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2026.05.004 [code]

A learning-evoked slow-oscillatory architecture paces population activity for offline reactivation across the human medial temporal lobe.

Journal: Neuron

In common: systems, 3 references

[3] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb3579

Elevating cerebellar theta oscillations boosts noninvasively induced motor plasticity.

Journal: Science advances

In common: other, systems, 1 reference

[4] doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121861

Experimental evaluation of an integrated focused ultrasound and electroencephalography approach for developing activation-informed neuroimaging.

Journal: NeuroImage

In common: other, systems, 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1038/s41380-026-03694-1 [code]

Targeting cortico-striatal-amygdalar networks via theta-band frontoparietal synchronization in opioid use disorder: a randomized tACS-fMRI Trial.

Journal: Molecular psychiatry

In common: other, other condition, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1002/alz.71547

Cortical synchrony is reduced in Alzheimer's disease and relates to arousal state.

Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association

In common: other, other condition, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2001-25.2026 [code]

Dynamics of Dentate Gyrus Place Cells and Dentate Spikes during Spatial and Nonspatial Changes in Environments.

Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience

In common: systems, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003979 [code]

Impaired midfrontal‑motor theta phase synchronization characterizes maladaptive motivational behavior in people with obsessive‑compulsive disorder.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: systems, other condition, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02232-0 [code]

Entorhinal cortex represents task-relevant remote locations independently of CA1.

Journal: Nature neuroscience

In common: systems, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e01031

Single-neuron responses to neurostimulation: Insights for epilepsy.

Journal: Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.