OSCR

Traveling waves across scales: Different mechanisms but same canonical computation?

Code ↔ Paper

3 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 3 matches
  1. [1] § A framework for contextualizing potential origins of first- and second-order traveling waves ↔ Model-TW-Fig2.m, lines 335–363 · score 0.59 · recipient structure, power law, propagation delay, postsynaptic
  2. [2] § A framework for contextualizing potential origins of first- and second-order traveling waves ↔ Model-TW-Fig2.m, lines 126–183 · score 0.52 · post synaptic, horizontal propagation, network, phase, cortical
  3. [3] § A framework for contextualizing potential origins of first- and second-order traveling waves ↔ Model-TW-Fig2.m, lines 335–363 · score 0.52 · power law exponent, recipient structure, convolution, NL, propagation, delay

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

MATLAB · 380 lines · 13 KB · no license · 3 matches

  1. %% ------------------------------------------ PARAMETERS
  2. AFP=0.2;% parameter of the alpha function (for g1)
  3. GainFB=0.25 ; % parameter for the gain of the feedback
  4. NL=4;% power law to account for the non-linearity (inspired from estimation going from vsd to spike)
  5. x=0:0.001:0.5; % temporal axis
  6. a1=0.024; % time constant of the first area
  7. d_tc=0.004; % increase of time constant from area to areas
  8. colcol=parula(5);
  9. % ---------- INTEGRATIVE TIME CONSTANTS IN ALL AREAS
  10. tc_a=a1:d_tc:(a1+5*d_tc);
  11. % g1 is the first input (alpha function) to the first area
  12. g1= x.^AFP .* exp (-x./tc_a(1)) ./ tc_a(1); % alpha function of the first area (FF driven)
  13. g1=g1./sum(g1); % normalization
  14. clear TC
  15. for i=1:5
  16. gtemp= exp (-x./tc_a(i)) ./ tc_a(i); % integration time constant of the i-st area
  17. TC(i,:)=gtemp./sum(gtemp); % normalization
  18. end
  19. % ---------- DELAYS BETWEEN ALL AREAS
  20. clear del
  21. del(1,2)=0.002; % delays from area 1 to area 2
  22. del(2,1)=0.004; % delays from area 2 to area 1
  23. for i=1:5
  24. del(i+1, i+2)=del(1,2); % delays from area i+1 to area i+2
  25. del(i+2, i+1)=del(2,1); % delays from area i+2 to area i+1
  26. end
  27. %% ------------------------------------------ FIGURE 2A
  28. % In this figure, we take a simple response (yy) and add to it the effect
  29. % of delay yy_DL, then integration time constant (yy_DL_TC) and then
  30. % nonlinearity (yy_DL_TC_NL)
  31. figure(21)
  32. clf, set(gcf,'PaperPosition',[0.25 0.25 50 10]);
  33. % CortConv is a function simulating the cortical integration (see below)
  34. % the first step is thus to integrate an alpha function (g1)
  35. % depending on the parameter of the CortConv function :
  36. % (input, time constant, delay, time vector, power law exponent)
  37. yy = CortConv( g1 ,squeeze(TC(1,:)),0 ,x,NL);
  38. yy_DL = CortConv( yy ,zeros(1,501) , del(1,2),x,1 );
  39. yy_DL_TC = CortConv( yy ,squeeze(TC(1,:)), del(1,2),x,1 );
  40. yy_DL_TC_NL = CortConv( yy ,squeeze(TC(1,:)), del(1,2),x,NL);
  41. subplot(1,5,1) % ---------- plot of yy
  42. plot(x,yy,'color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',4);
  43. hold on
  44. [HWg(1)]=find(yy>=max(yy/2),1);
  45. plot(x(HWg(1)),yy(HWg(1)),'o','color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',15,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  46. line([ 0 0],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2)
  47. xlim([-0.005 0.10])
  48. ylim([-0.001 0.025])
  49. xlabel('Time ms')
  50. ylabel('Activity (au)')
  51. grid;
  52. Figure_appearance
  53. subplot(1,5,2) % ---------- plot of y_DL
  54. plot(x,yy_DL,'color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',4);
  55. hold on
  56. [HWg(2)]=find(yy_DL>=max(yy_DL/2),1);
  57. plot(x(HWg(2)),yy_DL(HWg(2)),'o','color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',15,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  58. line([ (del(1,2)) (del(1,2))],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2)
  59. xlim([-0.005 0.10])
  60. ylim([-0.001 0.025])
  61. title('+ D')
  62. grid;
  63. Figure_appearance
  64. subplot(1,5,3) % ---------- plot of yy_DL_TC
  65. plot(x,yy_DL_TC,'color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',4);
  66. hold on
  67. [HWg(3)]=find(yy_DL_TC>=max(yy_DL_TC/2),1);
  68. plot(x(HWg(3)),yy_DL_TC(HWg(3)),'o','color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',15,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  69. line([ (del(1,2)) (del(1,2))],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2)
  70. xlim([-0.005 0.10])
  71. ylim([-0.001 0.025])
  72. title('+ D+TC')
  73. grid;
  74. Figure_appearance
  75. subplot(1,5,4) % ---------- plot of yy_DL_TC_NL
  76. plot(x,yy_DL_TC_NL,'color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',4);
  77. hold on
  78. [HWg(4)]=find(yy_DL_TC_NL>=max(yy_DL_TC_NL/2),1);
  79. plot(x(HWg(4)),yy_DL_TC_NL(HWg(4)),'o','color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',15,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  80. line([ (del(1,2)) (del(1,2))],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2)
  81. xlim([-0.005 0.10])
  82. ylim([-0.001 0.025])
  83. title('+ NL + D + TC')
  84. grid;
  85. Figure_appearance
  86. subplot(1,5,5) % ---------- plot of phase estimations across all 4 conditions
  87. hold on
  88. plot(1000*del(1,2)*0,1000*x(HWg(1)),'o','color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',10,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  89. for z=2:4 % times steps
  90. plot(1000*del(1,2),1000*x(HWg(z)),'o','color',colcol(2,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',10,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  91. end
  92. grid; Figure_appearance
  93. xlim([0 3])
  94. ylim([0 20])
  95. %% ------------------------------------------ FIG 2B
  96. % figure illustrating the case of horizontal propagation within one area
  97. delH=0.01; % delay from each node sample along the horizontal network
  98. tab=[1 1; 2 2; 3 3; 4 4; 5 5 ]; % receiving layer / time step
  99. ER(1,1,:)=CortConv( g1 ,squeeze(TC(1,:)),0,x,NL); % CortConv is a function for the cortical integration
  100. clear HPSI % horizontal post-synaptic integration
  101. for z=1:size(tab,1) % times steps
  102. j=tab(z,1); k=tab(z,2);
  103. if j>1,
  104. HPSI(j,k,:)=CortConv( squeeze(ER(1,1,:)) ,squeeze(TC(j,:)), delH*(j-1),x,NL); % Horizontal PostSynaptic Integration (PSI) of layer j (Time constant j) of FF input (coming from layer j-1) , step k
  105. ER(j,k,:)=squeeze(HPSI(j,k,:));
  106. end
  107. end
  108. figure(22)
  109. clf, set(gcf,'PaperPosition',[0.25 0.25 50 10]);
  110. for z=2:size(tab,1) % t---------- Times steps
  111. j=tab(z,1);
  112. subplot(1,size(tab,1),z-1) % plot the hPSI at each step
  113. clcl=1;
  114. plot(x,squeeze(ER(j,j,:)),'color',colcol(clcl,:),'linewidth',4);
  115. hold on
  116. [HWz(j,j)]=find(ER(j,j,:)>=max(squeeze(ER(j,j,:)))/2,1); % extract and plot an approximation of the phase (half height) HWz
  117. plot(x(HWz(j,j)),squeeze(ER(j,j,HWz(j,j))),'o','color',colcol(clcl,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',15,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  118. line([ delH*(j-1) delH*(j-1)],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(clcl,:),'linewidth',2)
  119. xlim([-0.005 0.25])
  120. ylim([-0.001 0.025])
  121. grid;
  122. Figure_appearance
  123. end
  124. [HWz(1,1)]=find(ER(1,1,:)>=max(squeeze(ER(1,1,:)))/2,1); % extract an approximation of the phase (half height) HWz
  125. subplot(1,5,5) % ---------- final plot of the evolution of the phase (HWz) across all steps
  126. hold on
  127. line([0 40],1000*x(HWz(1,1))+[0 40],'color','k','linewidth',3,'linestyle',':')
  128. line([0 40],1000*x(HWz(1,1))+[0 80],'color','k','linewidth',2,'linestyle',':')
  129. line([0 40],1000*x(HWz(1,1))+[0 120],'color','k','linewidth',1,'linestyle',':')
  130. plot(0,1000*x(HWz(1,1)),'o','color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',10,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  131. for z=2:5 % times steps
  132. j=z+(k-1)*2;
  133. plot(1000*(z-1).*delH,1000*x(HWz(z,z)),'o','color',colcol(1,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',10,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  134. end
  135. ylim([0 90])
  136. grid; Figure_appearance
  137. %% ------------------------------------------ INTER-CORTICAL SIMULATION OF EVOKED RESPONSE (ER)
  138. % ER IS CALCULATED AS SUM OF POSTSYNAPTIC INTEGRATION (PSI) FROM Feedforward (FF) AND Feedback (FB)
  139. clear ER tab PSI
  140. % ER(i,j,:) is Evoked Response in time for hierarchical level i, and cycle step j
  141. ER(1,1,:)=CortConv( g1 ,squeeze(TC(1,:)),0,x,NL); % CortConv is a function for the cortical integration (see below)
  142. % the first step is thus to integrate an alpha function (g1)
  143. ER(2,1,:)=x.*0; % ER for downstream areas is set to 0 when no activity yet reached this level
  144. ER(3,1,:)=x.*0;
  145. ER(4,2,:)=x.*0;
  146. ER(5,3,:)=x.*0;
  147. ER(6,4,:)=x.*0;
  148. % tab is defining, for each time step z, the corresponding hierarchical level (tab(z,1)) and the cycle step (tab(z,2))
  149. tab=[2 2; 1 3; 3 3; 2 4; 4 4; 1 5 ;3 5 ;5 5; 2 6 ; 4 6 ; 1 7 ; 3 7 ; 5 7; 2 8 ; 4 8 ; 1 9 ; 3 9 ; 5 9 ; 4 10 ]; % receiving layer / time step
  150. for z=1:size(tab,1) % times steps
  151. j=tab(z,1); k=tab(z,2);
  152. if j>1,
  153. % PostSynaptic Integration (PSI) of layer j (Time constant j) of FF input (ER coming from layer j-1) , step k
  154. PSI(j-1,j,k,:)=CortConv( squeeze(ER(j-1,k-1,:)) ,squeeze(TC(j,:)), del(j-1,j),x,NL);
  155. % PostSynaptic Integration (PSI) of layer j (Time constant j) of FB input (ER coming from layer j+1) , step k
  156. PSI(j+1,j,k,:)=CortConv( squeeze(ER(j+1,k-1,:)) ,squeeze(TC(j,:)), del(j+1,j),x,NL);
  157. ER(j,k,:)=squeeze(PSI(j-1,j,k,:))+GainFB.*squeeze(PSI(j+1,j,k,:));
  158. else
  159. % PostSynaptic Integration (PSI) of layer j (Time constant j) of FB input (ER coming from layer j+1) , step k
  160. PSI(j+1,j,k,:)=CortConv( squeeze(ER(j+1,k-1,:)) ,squeeze(TC(j,:)), del(j+1,j),x,NL);
  161. ER(j,k,:)=squeeze(ER(j,k-2,:))+GainFB.*squeeze(PSI(j+1,j,k,:));
  162. end
  163. end
  164. %% ------------------------------------------ SUPPL FIG
  165. % Not in the paper, but shows all the cycles (columns)
  166. % iterations across all hierarchical levels (color-coded, row),
  167. % to calculate HWx, estimation of phase in each steps
  168. % feedforward is dotted, feedback dashed
  169. figure(24)
  170. clf, set(gcf,'PaperPosition',[0.25 0.25 40 25]);
  171. tab=[1 1; 2 2; 1 3; 3 3; 2 4; 4 4; 1 5 ;3 5 ; 2 6 ; 4 6 ; 1 7 ; 3 7 ; 2 8 ; 4 8 ; 3 9 ; 4 10 ]; % receiving layer / time step
  172. for z=1:size(tab,1) % ---------- times steps
  173. j=tab(z,1); k=tab(z,2);
  174. subplot('Position',[k/11-0.02 j/5-0.1 0.1 0.2])
  175. plot(x,squeeze(ER(j,k,:)),'color',colcol(j,:),'linewidth',4);
  176. hold on
  177. if j>1
  178. plot(x,squeeze(PSI(j-1,j,k,:)),'color',colcol(j-1,:),'linestyle',':','linewidth',2);
  179. plot(x,GainFB.*squeeze(PSI(j+1,j,k,:)),'color',colcol(j+1,:),'linestyle','--','linewidth',2);
  180. else
  181. if k>2, plot(x,squeeze(ER(j,k-2,:)),'k:','linewidth',2); end
  182. plot(x,GainFB.*squeeze(PSI(j+1,j,k,:)),'k--','linewidth',2);
  183. end
  184. % GENERATING FF (dotted) and FB (dashed) arrows
  185. gcap=get(gca,'Position');
  186. if j<4
  187. arh=annotation('arrow', [gcap(1)+gcap(3)/2 gcap(1)+gcap(3)/2+0.03 ],[gcap(2)+gcap(4)/1.5 gcap(2)+gcap(4)/1.5+0.05] );
  188. arh.LineWidth = 2; arh.LineStyle = ':';
  189. end
  190. if j>1
  191. arh=annotation('arrow', [gcap(1)+gcap(3)/4 gcap(1)+gcap(3)/4+0.03 ],[gcap(2)-0.02 gcap(2)-0.05] );
  192. arh.LineWidth = 2; arh.LineStyle = '--';
  193. end
  194. [HWx(j,k)]=find(ER(j,k,:)>=max(squeeze(ER(j,k,:)))/2,1); % extract phase as half-width
  195. plot(x(HWx(j,k)),squeeze(ER(j,k,HWx(j,k))),'o','color',colcol(j,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',15,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  196. line([ (del(1,2))*(j-1) (del(1,2))*(j-1)],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(j,:),'linewidth',2)
  197. xlim([-0.005 0.25])
  198. ylim([-0.001 0.025])
  199. grid;
  200. Figure_appearance
  201. end
  202. %% ------------------------------------------ FIG 2C
  203. % Figure compiling inter-cortical interactions across hierarchy
  204. % (color-coded) and cycle steps (rows)
  205. figure(23)
  206. clf,set(gcf,'PaperPosition',[0.25 0.25 50 10]);
  207. mxk=4 ;
  208. tab=[1 1; 2 2; 3 3; 4 4];
  209. for k=1:mxk
  210. subplot(1,mxk+1,k)
  211. hold on
  212. for z=1:4 % ---------- times steps
  213. j=z+(k-1)*2;
  214. plot(x, squeeze(ER(z,j,:)) ,'color',colcol(z,:),'linewidth',3)
  215. plot(x(HWx(z,j)),squeeze(ER(z,j,HWx(z,j))),'o','color',colcol(z,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',10,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  216. line([ (del(1,2))*(z-1) (del(1,2))*(z-1)],[0 0.005],'color',colcol(z,:),'linewidth',2)
  217. xlim([0 0.2])
  218. ylim([0 0.025])
  219. grid; Figure_appearance
  220. end
  221. end
  222. subplot(1,mxk+1,mxk+1) % ---------- last plot recapitulating all phase (HWx)
  223. hold on
  224. line([0 7],1000*x(HWx(1,1))+[0 7],'color','k','linewidth',3,'linestyle',':')
  225. line([0 7],1000*x(HWx(1,1))+[0 14],'color','k','linewidth',2,'linestyle',':')
  226. line([0 7],1000*x(HWx(1,1))+[0 28],'color','k','linewidth',1,'linestyle',':')
  227. line([0 7],1000*x(HWx(1,1))+[0 56],'color','k','linewidth',0.5,'linestyle',':')
  228. line([0 7],1000*x(HWx(1,1))+[0 112],'color','k','linewidth',0.25,'linestyle',':')
  229. sz=size(HWx);
  230. for k=1:mxk
  231. zz=1:4;
  232. jj=zz+(k-1)*2;
  233. plot(1000*(zz-1)*del(1,2),1000*x(HWx(sub2ind(sz,zz,jj))),'-','color','k','linewidth',k/2);
  234. for z=1:4 % times steps
  235. j=z+(k-1)*2;
  236. plot(1000*(z-1)*del(1,2),1000*x(HWx(z,j)),'o','color',colcol(z,:),'linewidth',2,'MarkerSize',10,'MarkerFaceColor','w');
  237. end
  238. end
  239. xlim([0 6.5])
  240. ylim([0 90])
  241. grid; Figure_appearance
  242. footer(['NL =' num2str(NL) ' | GainFB =' num2str(GainFB) ' | DEL12 =' num2str(del(1,2)) ' | DEL21 =' num2str(del(2,1)) ' | TC1 =' num2str(a1(1))])
  243. %% Convolution of the output of a structure (G) with a recipient structure with time constant (g), after a propagation delay d - time is x
  244. function Gt = CortConv(G,g,dd,x,NL)
  245. % G : input integrated by a recipient structure with time constant (g)
  246. % a power law exponent NL, and after a propagation delay d - time is x
  247. if sum(G)~=0,
  248. Gs=G.^NL./sum(G.^NL); % Nonlinearity to go from Voltage to Spike (Chen et al 2012)
  249. else
  250. Gs=G;
  251. end
  252. if sum(g)~=0,
  253. Gsg=conv(Gs,g,'full'); % convolution between the output of structure 1 and the postsynaptic integration time constant g
  254. else
  255. Gsg=Gs;
  256. end
  257. if sum(Gsg)~=0,
  258. Gsg=Gsg./sum(Gsg); % normalizing
  259. end
  260. d=find(x>=dd,1);
  261. Gt=[zeros(1,d) Gsg(1:length(x)-d)]; % adding delay d
  262. end
  263. %% Figure appearance
  264. function [] = Figure_appearance()
  265. box off
  266. set(gca,'TickDir','out')
  267. set(gca,'XScale', 'linear')
  268. set(gca,'fontangle','oblique')
  269. set(gca,'fontsize',16)
  270. set(gca,'ticklength',[0.01 0.025])
  271. axis square
  272. set(gcf,'Color','w')
  273. unis = get(gcf,'units');
  274. ppos = get(gcf,'paperposition');
  275. set(gcf,'units',get(gcf,'paperunits'));
  276. pos = get(gcf,'position');
  277. pos(3:4) = ppos(3:4);
  278. set(gcf,'position',pos);
  279. end

Model-TW-Fig2.m at commit f720be0, no license · at the source

Overview

  1. Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France
  2. Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
  3. Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR7289, Marseille, France
Journal: n/a, volume 14, article e106753
Dates: received 12 March 2025; accepted 5 November 2025; published online 19 November 2025
Type: Review · Language: English
License: none stated
Identifiers: DOI 10.7554/elife.106753 · PMCID PMC12629594 · OpenAlex W4416538761
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: human (organism), computational (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Evoked potentials, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures, Spectral & time-frequency
Keywords: Cortex, Neuroscience, Traveling Waves, Spatial Scales, Generative Mechanisms
MeSH: Brain*, Cerebral Cortex*, Models, Neurological*, Neurons*, Animals, Humans (* major topic)
Topic: Neural dynamics and brain function (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: European Research Council (852139); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-23-CE37-0019, ANR-20-CE37-0018, ANR-23-CE37-0024)
Citations: cited by 10 papers (Europe PMC); 98 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (none stated) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 3 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

fchavane/Model_TW

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 26 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: f720be0d17610942057fbb2f07ff05453e7f096f, 14 November 2025
Languages: MATLAB (1)
Size: 2 files, 1 script
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Data availability”
Holds: README
Not found: license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 26 September 2026: the link answers
  • 26 September 2026: the link answers
2 files

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 3 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Code and data availability statement

The paper has a code and data availability statement. Its license (none stated) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.7554/elife.106753.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 2 authors, 5 keywords, 6 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 95 references.

Cite

This paper

Dugué, L., & Chavane, F. (2025). Traveling waves across scales: Different mechanisms but same canonical computation? eLife, 14, e106753. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.106753

BibTeX

@article{dugue2025traveling,
author = {Dugué, Laura and Chavane, Frédéric},
title = {{Traveling waves across scales: Different mechanisms but same canonical computation?}},
journal = {eLife},
year = {2025},
volume = {14},
pages = {e106753},
publisher = {eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd},
issn = {2050-084X},
doi = {10.7554/elife.106753},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.106753},
pmcid = {PMC12629594}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Dugué, Laura
AU - Chavane, Frédéric
TI - Traveling waves across scales: Different mechanisms but same canonical computation?
T2 - eLife
J2 - Elife
PY - 2025
DA - 2025
VL - 14
SP - e106753
SN - 2050-084X
PB - eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
DO - 10.7554/elife.106753
UR - https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.106753
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.7554/elife.106753",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Traveling waves across scales: Different mechanisms but same canonical computation?",
"container-title": "eLife",
"author": [
{
"family": "Dugué",
"given": "Laura"
},
{
"family": "Chavane",
"given": "Frédéric"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Elife",
"volume": "14",
"page": "e106753",
"DOI": "10.7554/elife.106753",
"PMCID": "PMC12629594",
"ISSN": "2050-084X",
"publisher": "eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.106753",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2025
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.7554/elife.100674 [code]
The dominance of large-scale phase dynamics in human cortex, from delta to gamma.
Journal: eLife
In common: 14 references, author Laura Dugué
[2] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013007 [code]
Traveling waves in the human visual cortex: An MEG-EEG model-based approach
Journal: n/a
In common: 14 references, author Laura Dugué
[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71386-z [code]
Planar, spiral, and concentric traveling waves distinguish behavioral states in human memory.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 10 references
[4] doi:10.3389/fncom.2026.1844662
Quantifying cortex-wide traveling brain waves of complex patterns with a graph-based algorithm.
Journal: Frontiers in computational neuroscience
In common: computational, 8 references
[5] doi:10.7554/elife.108208 [code]
Realistic coupling enables flexible macroscopic traveling waves in the mouse cortex.
Journal: eLife
In common: computational, 8 references
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72931-6 [code]
Three parsimonious spatiotemporal patterns in cerebellum reveal individual traits in function and behavior.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 5 references
[7] doi:10.1073/pnas.2527296123
Traveling-wave transcranial alternating current stimulation (twtACS) causally links neural timing to cognitive function.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: 5 references
[8] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0012-26.2026 [code]
I Can't Hear You Both at the Same Time: A Temporal Dilemma During Inter-Regional Communication.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: 5 references
[9] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.117311 [code]
Thalamocortical network dynamics can explain visual impulse responses and perceptual echoes.
Journal: iScience
In common: 5 references
[10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76011-7 [code]
Human cortex organizes dynamic co-fluctuations along the sensorimotor-association axis.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 4 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.