OSCR

Technical development and implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the brain: A prospective R-IDEAL stage 0/1 technology development report.

Code ↔ Paper

The paper beside its authors' code: matches between them have not been computed for this paper yet.

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser; OSCR does not store it: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

Jupyter notebook · 334 lines · 13 KB · GPL-3.0

  1. # %% [markdown]
  2. # # Import necessary packages
  3. # %%
  4. from collections import Counter
  5. import os
  6. import cmcrameri.cm as cm_ref
  7. import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
  8. plt.rcParams['font.family'] = 'sans-serif'
  9. plt.rcParams['font.sans-serif'] = ['Arial']
  10. import nibabel as nib
  11. import numpy as np
  12. # %% [markdown]
  13. # # Define global variables
  14. # %%
  15. BASE_PATH = 'data'
  16. CMAPS = {
  17. 'T1': cm_ref.lipari,
  18. 'T2': cm_ref.navia,
  19. 'PD': cm_ref.glasgow
  20. }
  21. UNIT_TYPES = {
  22. 'T1': 'ms',
  23. 'T2': 'ms',
  24. 'PD': 'pu'
  25. }
  26. MIN_RANGE_CLINICAL = {
  27. 'T1': 200,
  28. 'T2': 35,
  29. 'PD': 20
  30. }
  31. MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL = {
  32. 'T1': 2500,
  33. 'T2': 120,
  34. 'PD': 120
  35. }
  36. NIST_REF_ENVIRONMENT = '3T-20C'
  37. NIST_REF_VALUES = {
  38. 'T1-vials': {
  39. 'T1-values': {
  40. '3T-20C': np.array([
  41. 1990.4, 1434.6, 1018.4, 743.3, 532.2, 382.1, 270.3, 194.2, 137.4, 94.3, 67.3, 48.3, 34, 24.4
  42. ])
  43. },
  44. 'T2-values': {
  45. '3T-20C': np.array([
  46. 1573.7, 1102.5, 761.6, 551.9, 396.3, 278.8, 196.5, 140.5, 98.9, 67.8, 48.2, 34.7, 24.3, 17.5
  47. ])
  48. }
  49. },
  50. 'T2-vials': {
  51. 'T1-values': {
  52. '3T-20C': np.array([
  53. 2406.3, 2152.6, 1879.5, 1605.8, 1291.9, 1062.7, 811.8, 633.9, 496.3, 326, 254.9, 185.7, 130.4, 94.9
  54. ])
  55. },
  56. 'T2-values': {
  57. '3T-20C': np.array([
  58. 621.6, 433.4, 288.3, 199.1, 131.8, 96.4, 65.6, 47.5, 35.2, 21.7, 16.5, 11.8, 8.1, 5.8
  59. ])
  60. }
  61. },
  62. 'PD-vials': {
  63. 'PD-values': {
  64. '3T-20C': np.array([
  65. 5.1, 10.2, 15, 20.7, 25.5, 30, 34.9, 39.8, 48.4, 59.1, 68.5, 78.3, 90.6, 99.5
  66. ])
  67. }
  68. }
  69. }
  70. # 3T -> 1.5T conversion factor?
  71. T1_15T = np.array([1741, 1270, 962, 685, 487, 346, 246, 179, 124, 88, 62, 44, 31, 22])
  72. T2_15T = np.array([1540, 1130, 845, 617, 430, 306, 218, 159, 110, 77, 54, 39, 28, 20])
  73. T1_3T = np.array([1884, 1330, 987, 690, 485, 342, 241, 175, 121, 86, 60, 43, 30, 21])
  74. T2_3T = np.array([1489, 1026, 737, 521, 354, 248, 175, 126, 87, 61, 42, 31, 22, 15])
  75. [m_T1,b_T1] = np.polyfit(T1_3T, T1_15T, 1)
  76. [m_T2,b_T2] = np.polyfit(T2_3T, T2_15T, 1)
  77. CONVERSION_FACTOR = {
  78. 'T1': (m_T1, b_T1),
  79. 'T2': (m_T2, b_T2),
  80. 'PD': (1, 0)
  81. }
  82. print(f"T1_3T = {CONVERSION_FACTOR['T1'][0]:.2f} * T1_1.5T + {CONVERSION_FACTOR['T1'][1]:.2f}")
  83. print(f"T2_3T = {CONVERSION_FACTOR['T2'][0]:.2f} * T2_1.5T + {CONVERSION_FACTOR['T2'][1]:.2f}")
  84. print(f"PD_3T = PD_1.5T")
  85. # %% [markdown]
  86. # # Define the functions used
  87. # %%
  88. def LCCC_score(x, y):
  89. """
  90. Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient
  91. """
  92. sxy = np.sum((x - x.mean())*(y - y.mean()))/x.shape[0]
  93. rhoc = 2*sxy / (np.var(x) + np.var(y) + (x.mean() - y.mean())**2)
  94. return rhoc
  95. # %% [markdown]
  96. # # Extract the vial values
  97. # %%
  98. n_sessions = 5
  99. n_reps = 2
  100. all_vial_values = {}
  101. for ref_type in ['T1','T2','PD']:
  102. all_vial_values[ref_type] = {
  103. 'mean': [],
  104. 'std': []
  105. }
  106. ref_vals = NIST_REF_VALUES[f'{ref_type}-vials'][f'{ref_type}-values'][NIST_REF_ENVIRONMENT]
  107. ref_vals = CONVERSION_FACTOR[ref_type][0] * ref_vals + CONVERSION_FACTOR[ref_type][1]
  108. all_vial_values[ref_type]['ref'] = ref_vals[::-1]
  109. for temp_session in range(1,n_sessions+1,1):
  110. vials_mask = nib.load(os.path.join(BASE_PATH, 'phantom', f'session{temp_session}', 'segmentation_vials.nii'))
  111. vials_mask = np.flip(np.transpose(vials_mask.get_fdata(), (2,1,0)), axis=0)
  112. temp_vals = {
  113. 'mean': [],
  114. 'std': []
  115. }
  116. for temp_rep in range(1,n_reps+1,1):
  117. temp_ims = nib.load(os.path.join(BASE_PATH, 'phantom', f'session{temp_session}', f'rep{temp_rep}', f'{ref_type}.nii'))
  118. temp_ims = np.flip(np.transpose(temp_ims.get_fdata(), (2,1,0)), axis=0)
  119. temp_temp_vals = {
  120. 'mean': [],
  121. 'std': []
  122. }
  123. if ref_type == 'T1':
  124. ind_start = 1
  125. ind_stop = 14
  126. if ref_type == 'T2':
  127. ind_start = 15
  128. ind_stop = 28
  129. if ref_type == 'PD':
  130. ind_start = 29
  131. ind_stop = 42
  132. for vial_num in range(ind_start,ind_stop+1,1):
  133. temp_temp_vals['mean'].append(np.mean(temp_ims[vials_mask == vial_num]))
  134. temp_temp_vals['std'].append(np.std(temp_ims[vials_mask == vial_num]))
  135. for k in temp_temp_vals.keys():
  136. temp_vals[k].append(temp_temp_vals[k])
  137. print(f'DONE: {ref_type}, Session: {temp_session}/{n_sessions}, Rep: {temp_rep}/{n_reps}')
  138. for k in temp_temp_vals.keys():
  139. all_vial_values[ref_type][k].append(np.array(temp_vals[k]))
  140. for k in all_vial_values[ref_type].keys():
  141. all_vial_values[ref_type][k] = np.array(all_vial_values[ref_type][k])
  142. # %% [markdown]
  143. # # Plot the concordance
  144. # %%
  145. fig,ax = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=3, figsize=(18,6))
  146. for r,ref_type in enumerate(['T1','T2','PD']):
  147. ref_vals = all_vial_values[ref_type]['ref']
  148. clinical_inds = np.where((ref_vals >= MIN_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]) & (ref_vals <= MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]))[0]
  149. ref_vals = ref_vals[clinical_inds]
  150. temp_values = np.squeeze(np.reshape(all_vial_values[ref_type]['mean'], (1,-1,14)))
  151. temp_values = temp_values[:,clinical_inds]
  152. n_measurements = temp_values.shape[0]
  153. ref_vals = np.array(n_measurements * [ref_vals])
  154. lccc = LCCC_score(ref_vals.flatten(), temp_values.flatten())
  155. # [m,b] = np.polyfit(ref_vals, np.mean(temp_values, axis=0), 1)
  156. # ax[r].plot([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [b,m*MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]+b], linestyle='--', color='r')
  157. m, residuals, rank, s = np.linalg.lstsq(ref_vals.flatten()[:,None], temp_values.flatten(), rcond=None)
  158. m = m[0]
  159. ax[r].plot([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [0,m*MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], linestyle='--', color='r')
  160. for measurement in range(n_measurements):
  161. if measurement == 0:
  162. # if b < 0:
  163. # temp_label = f'y = {m:.2f}x - {abs(b):.0f} (LCCC = {lccc:.2f})'
  164. # else:
  165. # temp_label = f'y = {m:.2f}x + {b:.0f} (LCCC = {lccc:.2f})'
  166. temp_label = f'y = {m:.2f}x (LCCC = {lccc:.2f})'
  167. ax[r].scatter(ref_vals[measurement,:], temp_values[measurement,:], s=100, color='k', edgecolors='k', label=temp_label)
  168. else:
  169. ax[r].scatter(ref_vals[measurement,:], temp_values[measurement,:], s=100, color='k', edgecolors='k')
  170. ax[r].plot([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], linestyle='--', color='k')
  171. ax[r].set_xlim([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]])
  172. ax[r].set_ylim([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]])
  173. ax[r].set_xlabel(f'Reference {ref_type} ({UNIT_TYPES[ref_type]})', fontsize=24)
  174. ax[r].set_ylabel(f'Measured {ref_type} ({UNIT_TYPES[ref_type]})', fontsize=24)
  175. ax[r].tick_params(axis='both', which='major', labelsize=22)
  176. ax[r].legend(loc='upper left', framealpha=1, fontsize=21)
  177. plt.tight_layout()
  178. plt.show()
  179. # %% [markdown]
  180. # # Band-Altman Plot
  181. # %%
  182. fig,ax = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=3, figsize=(18,6))
  183. for r,ref_type in enumerate(['T1','T2','PD']):
  184. ref_vals = all_vial_values[ref_type]['ref']
  185. clinical_inds = np.where((ref_vals >= MIN_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]) & (ref_vals <= MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]))[0]
  186. ref_vals = ref_vals[clinical_inds]
  187. temp_values = np.squeeze(np.reshape(all_vial_values[ref_type]['mean'], (1,-1,14)))
  188. temp_values = temp_values[:,clinical_inds]
  189. n_measurements = temp_values.shape[0]
  190. ref_vals = np.array(n_measurements * [ref_vals])
  191. all_vals = []
  192. for measurement in range(n_measurements):
  193. temp_x_vals = ref_vals[measurement]
  194. temp_y_vals = temp_values[measurement]
  195. ax[r].scatter(np.mean([temp_x_vals, temp_y_vals], axis=0), temp_y_vals - temp_x_vals, s=100, color='k', edgecolors='k')
  196. all_vals.append(temp_y_vals - temp_x_vals)
  197. all_vals = np.array(all_vals).flatten()
  198. min_y = np.mean(all_vals)-1.96*np.std(all_vals)
  199. max_y = np.mean(all_vals)+1.96*np.std(all_vals)
  200. range_y = max_y - min_y
  201. ax[r].plot([0,MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [0,0], linestyle='-', color='k')
  202. ax[r].plot([0,MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [np.mean(all_vals),np.mean(all_vals)], linestyle='-', color='g')
  203. ax[r].plot([0,MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [min_y,min_y], linestyle='--', color='g')
  204. ax[r].plot([0,MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]], [max_y,max_y], linestyle='--', color='g')
  205. ax[r].set_xlim([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]])
  206. ax[r].set_ylim([min_y-0.75*range_y, max_y+0.75*range_y])
  207. ax[r].set_xlabel(f'Mean {ref_type} ({UNIT_TYPES[ref_type]})', fontsize=24)
  208. ax[r].set_ylabel(f'Meas. - Ref. {ref_type} ({UNIT_TYPES[ref_type]})', fontsize=24)
  209. ax[r].tick_params(axis='both', which='major', labelsize=22)
  210. plt.tight_layout()
  211. plt.show()
  212. # %% [markdown]
  213. # # Plot both repeatability / reproducibility
  214. # %%
  215. fig,ax = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=3, figsize=(18,6))
  216. for r,ref_type in enumerate(['T1','T2','PD']):
  217. ref_vals = all_vial_values[ref_type]['ref']
  218. clinical_inds = np.where((ref_vals >= MIN_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]) & (ref_vals <= MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]))[0]
  219. ref_vals = ref_vals[clinical_inds]
  220. temp_values_repeatability = np.mean(100 * np.std(all_vial_values[ref_type]['mean'], axis=1) / np.mean(all_vial_values[ref_type]['mean'], axis=1), axis=0)
  221. temp_values_repeatability = temp_values_repeatability[clinical_inds]
  222. temp_values_reproducibility = np.mean(100 * np.std(all_vial_values[ref_type]['mean'], axis=0) / np.mean(all_vial_values[ref_type]['mean'], axis=0), axis=0)
  223. temp_values_reproducibility = temp_values_reproducibility[clinical_inds]
  224. ax[r].bar(x=ref_vals, height=temp_values_reproducibility, width=(MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]-MIN_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type])/25, color='k', label='Reproducibility')
  225. ax[r].bar(x=ref_vals, height=temp_values_repeatability, width=(MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]-MIN_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type])/25, color='grey', label='Repeatability')
  226. ax[r].set_xlim([0, MAX_RANGE_CLINICAL[ref_type]])
  227. ax[r].set_ylim([0, 10])
  228. ax[r].set_xlabel(f'Reference {ref_type} ({UNIT_TYPES[ref_type]})', fontsize=24)
  229. ax[r].set_ylabel(f'CoV (%)', fontsize=24)
  230. ax[r].tick_params(axis='both', which='major', labelsize=22)
  231. ax[r].legend(fontsize=20)
  232. plt.tight_layout()
  233. plt.show()
  234. # %% [markdown]
  235. # # Distortion heatmap / scatter (combined across all dimensions)
  236. # %%
  237. geo_coords = [(36, 87, 128), (36, 128, 88), (36, 167, 128), (36, 127, 168), (76, 47, 128), (76, 88, 88), (76, 87, 128), (76, 87, 168), (76, 127, 48), (76, 127, 88), (76, 128, 128), (76, 127, 168), (76, 127, 208), (76, 167, 88), (76, 167, 128), (76, 167, 168), (76, 207, 128), (116, 47, 87), (116, 47, 128), (116, 47, 168), (116, 88, 48), (116, 87, 88), (116, 87, 127), (116, 88, 168), (116, 88, 208), (116, 127, 48), (116, 127, 88), (116, 126, 127), (116, 127, 168), (116, 127, 208), (116, 168, 48), (116, 167, 88), (116, 167, 128), (116, 167, 167), (116, 167, 208), (116, 207, 88), (116, 207, 128), (116, 207, 168), (155, 47, 128), (155, 87, 88), (155, 88, 128), (155, 87, 168), (155, 127, 48), (155, 127, 88), (155, 128, 128), (155, 127, 168), (155, 127, 208), (155, 167, 88), (155, 167, 128), (155, 167, 168), (155, 207, 128), (194, 88, 128), (194, 127, 88), (194, 127, 128), (194, 128, 168), (194, 167, 128)]
  238. voxel_size = [1,1,1]
  239. center_coords = (116,126,127)
  240. actual_coords = (
  241. np.array([center_coords[0] + 40*v for v in [-2,-1,0,1,2]]),
  242. np.array([center_coords[1] + 40*v for v in [-2,-1,0,1,2]]),
  243. np.array([center_coords[2] + 40*v for v in [-2,-1,0,1,2]])
  244. )
  245. dim_colors = ['r','g','b']
  246. possible_x_vals = np.array([0.0, 40.0, 56.56854249, 69.2820323, 80.0, 89.4427191])
  247. possible_y_vals = np.array([-2, -1, 0, 1, 2])
  248. all_plot_vals = []
  249. for v in range(len(geo_coords)):
  250. temp_coord = [geo_coords[v][0], geo_coords[v][1], geo_coords[v][2]]
  251. nearest_coords = []
  252. for temp_dim in range(len(actual_coords)):
  253. nearest_ind = np.argmin(abs(temp_coord[temp_dim] - actual_coords[temp_dim]))
  254. nearest_coords.append(actual_coords[temp_dim][nearest_ind])
  255. distance_from_center = np.sqrt(
  256. (nearest_coords[0] - center_coords[0])**2 +
  257. (nearest_coords[1] - center_coords[1])**2 +
  258. (nearest_coords[2] - center_coords[2])**2
  259. )
  260. distortion = np.sqrt(
  261. (temp_coord[0] - nearest_coords[0])**2 +
  262. (temp_coord[1] - nearest_coords[1])**2 +
  263. (temp_coord[2] - nearest_coords[2])**2
  264. )
  265. all_plot_vals.append((distance_from_center, distortion))
  266. # Scatter
  267. plt.figure(figsize=(10,6))
  268. final_plot_vals = Counter(all_plot_vals)
  269. for temp_coord in final_plot_vals.keys():
  270. plt.scatter(temp_coord[0], temp_coord[1], s=10*final_plot_vals[temp_coord], color='k')
  271. final_plot_vals = Counter(all_plot_vals)
  272. all_box_vals = []
  273. for temp_x in possible_x_vals:
  274. temp_box_vals = []
  275. for temp_coord in final_plot_vals.keys():
  276. if abs(temp_coord[0] - temp_x) < 1:
  277. temp_box_vals.append(temp_coord[1])
  278. all_box_vals.append(temp_box_vals)
  279. res = plt.boxplot(all_box_vals, positions=possible_x_vals, widths=[5]*len(all_box_vals), medianprops=dict(color='r', linewidth=2.5))
  280. ax = plt.gca()
  281. ax.tick_params(axis='both', which='major', labelsize=20)
  282. ax.set_xticks([0,20,40,60,80,100])
  283. ax.set_xticklabels([0,20,40,60,80,100])
  284. plt.xlabel('Distance From Center (mm)', fontsize=22)
  285. plt.ylabel('Distortion (mm)', fontsize=22)
  286. plt.tight_layout()
  287. plt.show()
  288. [print(np.mean(res['medians'][i].get_xdata()), res['medians'][i].get_ydata()[0], res['boxes'][i].get_ydata()[0], res['boxes'][i].get_ydata()[2]) for i in range(len(res['medians']))]

analysis_paper.ipynb at commit b9644f1, under GPL-3.0 · at the source

Overview

  1. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Houston Texas USA
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
  3. Department of Imaging Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
  4. Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Journal: Journal of applied clinical medical physics, volume 27, issue 11, article e70886
Dates: received 27 April 2026; accepted 6 October 2026; published online 28 October 2026; in print November 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1002/acm2.70886 · PMID 42949424 · PMCID PMC13715509 · OpenAlex W7134972904
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: structural MRI / diffusion (modality), human (organism), other condition (population), clinical / translational (subfield)
Methods: fMRI & imaging, Statistics
Keywords: 3D‐QALAS, adaptive radiation therapy, brain, cancer, MRI, MR‐Linac, QALAS, quantitative imaging, radiation therapy, radiotherapy, SyMRI, SyntheticMR
MeSH: Brain*, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*, Imaging, Three-Dimensional*, Magnetic Resonance Imaging*, Particle Accelerators*, Phantoms, Imaging*, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted*, Adult, Feasibility Studies, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Prospective Studies, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Reproducibility of Results (* major topic)
Topic: Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Funding: national institutes of health (R01CA257814‐02S2); National Institutes of Health Career Development Award (K23DA049216); National Science Foundation (NSF)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute (NCI); Smart and Connected Health (SCH) (R01CA257814); NIH National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) (R01DE028290); NIH NCI MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) (P30CA016672)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 68 references in the paper

Abstract

Background: Quantitative relaxometry of the brain on the integrated MRI / linear accelerator (MR‐Linac) at high isotropic reconstructed resolution is currently limited due to prohibitively long scan times and limited field‐of‐views.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the technical feasibility of the 3D‐QALAS technique on the 1.5T MR‐Linac which can acquire whole‐brain 1 mm isotropic quantitative T1, T2, and PD maps along with multiple synthetic images in a 7‐minute acquisition time.

Methods: A 1 mm isotropic 3D‐QALAS acquisition was scanned in both phantoms and five healthy volunteers on the 1.5T Elekta Unity MR‐Linac device with scan times around seven minutes. A test‐retest protocol across five independent sessions for the phantom was conducted. The Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (LCCC), repeatability, and reproducibility between measured and reference quantitative T1, T2, and PD values were determined in the phantom. Distortion was also studied. Vendor‐provided reconstruction through SyMRI was performed to extract synthetic images and brain volume metric assessments in the healthy volunteers.

Results: The slope and LCCC between the measured and phantom reference values was 1.02 (1.00), 1.09 (0.90), and 0.99 (1.00) for T1, T2, and PD, respectively. Median distortion across the phantom remained below 2 mm. The repeatability and reproducibility coefficient‐of‐variation (CoV) was under 8% for all measured values. The measured brain volumes in the healthy volunteer was within expected age‐adjusted reference values.

Conclusions: The technical feasibility of using 3D‐QALAS on the integrated 1.5T MR‐Linac was confirmed. Applying this technique to the adaptive radiation therapy workflow of the brain will provide new opportunities to integrate quantitative imaging relaxometry biomarkers at 1 mm isotropic reconstructed resolution.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above.

Lucas-Mc/QALAS-MRL_R-IDEAL_0-1

License: GPL-3.0
State: the link answers, verified on 1 November 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: b9644f13826dc672f45a4502ca8e252868407066, 11 March 2026
Languages: Jupyter (1)
Size: 6 files, 1 script
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT”
Holds: README, license file, environment (requirements.txt), 1 notebook
Not found: CITATION.cff, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: Matplotlib (1 file), NiBabel (1 file), NumPy (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 1 November 2026: the link answers
  • 1 November 2026: the link answers
3 files

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability statement

All relevant image files and contours in NIfTI format are to be made publicly available after manuscript acceptance at the following FigShare URL: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31594819. The accompanying code for image visualization and statistical analysis will be made publicly available at the following URL: https://github.com/Lucas‐Mc/QALAS‐MRL_R‐IDEAL_0‐1 (https://github.com/Lucas-Mc/QALAS-MRL_R-IDEAL_0-1).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 1 November 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 9 authors, 12 keywords, 15 MeSH terms, 6 funders, 68 references.

Cite

This paper

McCullum, L., Harrington, A., West, N., Nehring, G., Fu, Z., Subashi, E., Taylor, B. A., Hwang, K., & Fuller, C. D. (2026). Technical development and implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the brain: A prospective R-IDEAL stage 0/1 technology development report. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 27(11), e70886. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70886

BibTeX

@article{mccullum2026technical,
author = {McCullum, Lucas and Harrington, Ashley and West, Natalie and Nehring, Grace and Fu, Ziyu and Subashi, Ergys and Taylor, Brian A. and Hwang, Ken‐Pin and Fuller, Clifton D.},
title = {{Technical development and implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the brain: A prospective R-IDEAL stage 0/1 technology development report}},
journal = {Journal of applied clinical medical physics},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
volume = {27},
number = {11},
pages = {e70886},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {1526-9914},
doi = {10.1002/acm2.70886},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70886},
pmid = {42949424},
pmcid = {PMC13715509}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - McCullum, Lucas
AU - Harrington, Ashley
AU - West, Natalie
AU - Nehring, Grace
AU - Fu, Ziyu
AU - Subashi, Ergys
AU - Taylor, Brian A.
AU - Hwang, Ken‐Pin
AU - Fuller, Clifton D.
TI - Technical development and implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the brain: A prospective R-IDEAL stage 0/1 technology development report
T2 - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
J2 - J Appl Clin Med Phys
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
VL - 27
IS - 11
SP - e70886
SN - 1526-9914
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1002/acm2.70886
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70886
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1002/acm2.70886",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Technical development and implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the brain: A prospective R-IDEAL stage 0/1 technology development report",
"container-title": "Journal of applied clinical medical physics",
"author": [
{
"family": "McCullum",
"given": "Lucas"
},
{
"family": "Harrington",
"given": "Ashley"
},
{
"family": "West",
"given": "Natalie"
},
{
"family": "Nehring",
"given": "Grace"
},
{
"family": "Fu",
"given": "Ziyu"
},
{
"family": "Subashi",
"given": "Ergys"
},
{
"family": "Taylor",
"given": "Brian A."
},
{
"family": "Hwang",
"given": "Ken‐Pin"
},
{
"family": "Fuller",
"given": "Clifton D."
}
],
"container-title-short": "J Appl Clin Med Phys",
"volume": "27",
"issue": "11",
"page": "e70886",
"DOI": "10.1002/acm2.70886",
"PMID": "42949424",
"PMCID": "PMC13715509",
"ISSN": "1526-9914",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70886",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
11,
1
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3390/tomography12020013
Clinical Image Quality and Reader Variability in 3D Synthetic Brain MRI Compared with Conventional MRI.
Journal: Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational, 6 references
[2] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332562 [code]
Intraoperative 3D quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric brain tumour surgery.
Journal: PloS one
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational, other condition, 4 references
[3] doi:10.1109/access.2024.3508761 [code]
Enhanced Partial Fourier MRI With Zero-Shot Deep Untrained Priors.
Journal: IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions
In common: Matplotlib, NumPy, structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01934-w [code]
A serotonergic biobehavioral signature differentiates cocaine use disorder participants administered mirtazapine.
Journal: Translational psychiatry
In common: other condition, author Brian A. Taylor
[5] doi:10.1162/imag.a.916 [code]
Repeatability and reproducibility of rapid T&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; mapping of brain tissues at 64 mT: A multicentre study.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: NiBabel, Matplotlib, NumPy, structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
[6] doi:10.1002/mrm.70439 [code]
Group-Patch Joint Compression: Compressing Dynamic B&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; and Static RF Spatial Modulations Across k-Space Subregion Groups for Highly Accelerated MRI.
Journal: Magnetic resonance in medicine
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
[7] doi:10.1007/s10334-025-01293-9 [code]
RF phase modulation improves quantitative transient state sequences under constrained conditions.
Journal: Magma (New York, N.Y.)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
[8] doi:10.1007/s00415-025-13317-4
MRI-based human brain atlases of R1, R2, proton density, and myelin volume fraction using synthetic quantitative imaging at 1.5 T.
Journal: Journal of neurology
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 3 references
[9] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43755-7 [code]
Development of head-to-head and longitudinal CycleGAN algorithm for MRI harmonization: validation in follow-up MRI evaluation in patients with brain metastasis.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: NiBabel, Matplotlib, NumPy, structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference
[10] doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ae3e96 [code]
An efficient 3D latent diffusion model for T1-contrast enhanced MRI generation.
Journal: Biomedical physics & engineering express
In common: NiBabel, Matplotlib, NumPy, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Add the badge to the code's README

OSCR: the badge of this paper

If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.

Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/acm2.70886.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/acm2.70886)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->
reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/acm2.70886.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/acm2.70886
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end
HTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/acm2.70886"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/acm2.70886.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

On GitHub, open the README, choose Edit (the pencil), paste the snippet under the title, then "Commit changes".

If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Versions of its code: the releases of its code tied to a version of this paper (the preprint, the accepted manuscript, the version of record…), each with the tracing map versioned with it.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.