OSCR

Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia.

Code ↔ Paper

1 match between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 1 match · it ties a paragraph to a whole file without given lines: a weak match, whose lines are not tinted
  1. [1] § Results › Sensitivity of Cognitive Measures Across the AD Continuum ↔ R/data.R, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.57 · ADAS cog, Mild Cognitive, predicted disease, longitudinal, MMSE, trajectories · Report a mismatch

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser; OSCR does not store it: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

R · 34 lines · 1.4 KB · no license · 1 match

  1. #' Simulated longitudinal ADAS-cog and MMSE scores
  2. #'
  3. #' A dataset containing longitudinal simulated ADAS-cog and MMSE scores
  4. #' for a large number of individuals that are cognitively normal, have mild
  5. #' congnitive impairment (MCI) or dementia.
  6. #' Data is simulated based on ADNI data.
  7. #'
  8. #' @format A data frame with 9378 rows and 7 variables:
  9. #' \describe{
  10. #' \item{subject_id}{Subject ID}
  11. #' \item{Month_bl}{Months since baseline}
  12. #' \item{ADAS13}{Simulated 13-item ADAS-cog score}
  13. #' \item{MMSE}{Simulated MMSE score}
  14. #' \item{CN}{Was subject cognitively normal at baseline (0/1)?}
  15. #' \item{MCI}{Was subject mild cognitively impaired at baseline (0/1)?}
  16. #' \item{DEM}{Did subject have dementia at baseline (0/1)?}
  17. #' \item{blstatus}{Patient status at baseline (Cognitively normal/MCI/Dementia)}
  18. #' }
  19. "adas_mmse_data"
  20. #' Predicted disease stage at baseline for ADNI participants
  21. #'?AD
  22. #' A dataset containing the predicted disease stage (disease month) for
  23. #' individuals in ADNI based on their longitudinal 13-item ADAS-cog trajectories
  24. #' Data are based on a data cut of ADAS-cog scores from July 2019.
  25. #'
  26. #' @format A data frame with 2130 rows and 3 variables:
  27. #' \describe{
  28. #' \item{RID}{ADNI roster ID}
  29. #' \item{pred_AD_month}{Predicted disease time (in months relative to the average cognitive state of the cognitively normal group)}
  30. #' }
  31. "ADNI_disease_stage_bl"

data.R at commit d374fb3, no license · at the source

Overview

Authors: Fredrik Öhman1,2,3, Lars Lau Raket4, Michael Schöll1,2,3, for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative†
ORCID iDs: Michael Schöll
  1. Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
  2. Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
  4. Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
Journal: Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), volume 13, issue 32, article e18124
Dates: received 29 September 2025; accepted 19 March 2026; published online 30 March 2026; in print June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1002/advs.202518124 · PMID 41910174 · PMCID PMC13252657 · OpenAlex W7143423062
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: PET / SPECT (modality), human (organism), Alzheimer's / dementia (population), clinical / translational (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, clinical assessment, clinical trials, cognition, preclinical
MeSH: Alzheimer Disease*, Cognition*, Cognitive Dysfunction*, Dementia*, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Female, Humans, Male, Positron-Emission Tomography (* major topic)
Topic: Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (Psychiatry and Mental health, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Funding: European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program (101132933, 101112145); Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (AF-994900); Swedish Brain Foundation (FO2021-0311, FO2024-0372); Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW2023.0371, KAW2014.0363); Gates Ventures; Swedish Research Council (2023-06188, 2021-02678, 2021-06545, 2017-02869); Swedish state, the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-813971, ALFGBG-965326); Vetenskapsrådet (2021–06545, 2017‐02869, 2021–02678, 2023–06188); Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (KAW2023.0371, KAW2014.0363); National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2023-00263612, RS‐2023‐00263612); Hjärnfonden (FO2021‐0311, FO2024‐0372); Västra Götaland Region R&D (VGFOUREG-995510); Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; National Institutes of Health (R01 AG081394‐01); NIH HHS (R01 AG081394-01)
Citations: cited by 1 paper (Europe PMC); 64 references in the paper

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is marked by progressive cognitive decline, highlighting the importance of cognitive assessment in both clinical practice and research. This study investigates the temporal dynamics of cognitive decline and the differential sensitivity of cognitive measures across the AD spectrum. Cognitive measures, functional assessments, and amyloid‐beta (Aβ) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) are analyzed using a latent‐time disease progression model. Data from 1,447 participants across cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages are positioned along an estimated AD timeline. The model estimates a ∼20‐year progression from initial Aβ PET positivity to late‐stage dementia. Cognitive trajectories reveal that cognitive measures deviate at different time points, with varying levels of abnormality across the disease continuum. These findings demonstrate that cognitive measures differ markedly in their sensitivity across the AD continuum. Characterizing when specific measures become abnormal provides a framework for stage‐appropriate test selection in clinical practice, improving clinical interpretation while informing the choice of cognitive endpoints and inclusion criteria in clinical trials.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 1 match between paragraphs and lines of code.

larslau/progmod

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 28 October 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: d374fb34a87d469891ab675f2c7294676e62dec9, 5 April 2022
Languages: R (2)
Size: 14 files, 2 scripts
Software Heritage: archived
Found in: the references
Holds: README, environment (DESCRIPTION), documentation
Not found: license file, CITATION.cff, tests, continuous integration
Tools: nlme (1 file)
Availability: 2 checks, the latest on 28 October 2026: the link answers
  • 28 October 2026: the link answers
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers
3 files

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 2 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 1 match between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this study were obtained from the ADNI database (https://adni.loni.usc.edu). ADNI data were publicly available to qualified researchers upon registration and approval through the ADNI Data Use Agreement.

Data used in this study were obtained from the ADNI database (https://adni.loni.usc.edu). ADNI data are publicly available to qualified researchers upon registration and approval through the ADNI Data Use Agreement.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 6 keywords, 13 MeSH terms, 15 funders, 52 references.

Cite

This paper

Öhman, F., Raket, L. L., Schöll, M., & for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative†. (2026). Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 13(32), e18124. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202518124

BibTeX

@article{ohman2026cognitive,
author = {Öhman, Fredrik and Raket, Lars Lau and Schöll, Michael and {for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative†}},
title = {{Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia}},
journal = {Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)},
year = {2026},
month = mar,
volume = {13},
number = {32},
pages = {e18124},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {2198-3844},
doi = {10.1002/advs.202518124},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202518124},
pmid = {41910174},
pmcid = {PMC13252657}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Öhman, Fredrik
AU - Raket, Lars Lau
AU - Schöll, Michael
AU - for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative†
TI - Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia
T2 - Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)
J2 - Adv Sci (Weinh)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/30
VL - 13
IS - 32
SP - e18124
SN - 2198-3844
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1002/advs.202518124
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202518124
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1002/advs.202518124",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia",
"container-title": "Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Öhman",
"given": "Fredrik"
},
{
"family": "Raket",
"given": "Lars Lau"
},
{
"family": "Schöll",
"given": "Michael"
},
{
"literal": "for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative†"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Adv Sci (Weinh)",
"volume": "13",
"issue": "32",
"page": "e18124",
"DOI": "10.1002/advs.202518124",
"PMID": "41910174",
"PMCID": "PMC13252657",
"ISSN": "2198-3844",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202518124",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
3,
30
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1093/brain/awaf413 [code]
Estimating the time course of biomarker changes in Alzheimer's disease.
Journal: Brain : a journal of neurology
In common: nlme, PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 10 references
[2] doi:10.1002/alz.70762 [code]
Cortical thickness subtypes in cognitively unimpaired individuals: Differential network and transcriptomic vulnerability to cortical thinning.
Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
In common: PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 2 references, author Michael Schöll
[3] doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000209419 [code]
Continuous β-Amyloid CSF/PET Imbalance Model to Capture Alzheimer Disease Heterogeneity.
Journal: Neurology
In common: PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 4 references
[4] doi:10.1002/alz.14174
Personalizing progressive changes to brain structure in Alzheimer's disease using normative modeling.
Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
In common: Alzheimer's / dementia, 5 references
[5] doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02009-0 [code]
Disease progression model anchored around clinical diagnosis in longitudinal cohorts: example of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia.
Journal: BMC medical research methodology
In common: Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 5 references
[6] doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103912
Amyloid PET predicts atrophy in older adults without dementia: Results from the AMYPAD Prognostic & Natural History study.
Journal: NeuroImage. Clinical
In common: PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, clinical / translational, 1 reference, author Michael Schöll
[7] doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02363-4 [code]
Cortical thickness changes precede high levels of amyloid by at least 7 years.
Journal: Nature neuroscience
In common: PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, 5 references
[8] doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01763-8 [code]
Synergistic association of Aβ and tau pathology with cortical neurophysiology and cognitive decline in asymptomatic older adults.
Journal: Nature neuroscience
In common: nlme, PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, 4 references
[9] doi:10.1002/alz.70143 [code]
Analyzing heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease using multimodal normative modeling on imaging-based ATN biomarkers.
Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
In common: PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, 5 references
[10] doi:10.1002/alz.71609
Cortical gray-white matter contrast alterations precede amyloid-β positivity and macrostructural changes in older adults without dementia.
Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
In common: PET / SPECT, Alzheimer's / dementia, 1 reference, author Michael Schöll

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Add the badge to the code's README

OSCR: the badge of this paper

If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.

Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/advs.202518124.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/advs.202518124)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->
reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/advs.202518124.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/advs.202518124
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end
HTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/advs.202518124"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/advs.202518124.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

On GitHub, open the README, choose Edit (the pencil), paste the snippet under the title, then "Commit changes".

If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Versions of its code: the releases of its code tied to a version of this paper (the preprint, the accepted manuscript, the version of record…), each with the tracing map versioned with it.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.