Multi-Centre Reproducibility of DTI and NODDI in White Matter Tracts Segmented Using TractFinder Across Three MRI Scanners of the Same Model.
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Shell · 38 lines · 1.8 KB · no license
- #!/bin/bash -e
- studySite='' # define the study site
- studySubject='' # define the subject ID
- studyPath='' # define the folder path
- studyData=$studyPath/$studySubject/$studySite
- # 1. MP-PCA denoising
- # uses a dilated brain mask to improve speed
- dwi2mask $studyData/dwi.mif - | maskfilter - dilate $studyData/preproc_mask.mif -npass 5
- mrview $studyData/dwi.mif -roi.load $studyData/preproc_mask.mif -roi.opacity 0.4
- # make sure to edit the preproc mask if too small and save it
- dwidenoise $studyData/dwi.mif $studyData/denoise.mif -noise $studyData/noiselevel.mif -mask $studyData/preproc_mask.mif
- mrview $studyData/noiselevel.mif
- # 2. Gibbs ringing correction
- mrdegibbs $studyData/denoise.mif $studyData/degibbs.mif
- mrview $studyData/degibbs.mif
- # 3. Motion & distortion correction (FSL topup / eddy)
- dwiextract $studyData/dwi.mif - -bzero | mrmath - mean $studyData/mean_bzero.mif -axis 3
- # merges the b0 (extracted by fslroi above) and the b0 flip into a single file, in this case b0pair
- mrcat $studyData/mean_bzero.mif $studyData/negPE.mif $studyData/b0pair.mif
- dwifslpreproc $studyData/degibbs.mif $studyData/topup_eddy_done.mif -rpe_pair -se_epi $studyData/b0pair.mif -pe_dir AP
- # input is the denoised, degibbs'ed .mif file
- # runs FSL's topup then eddy tools
- mrview $studyData/topup_eddy_done.mif
- # 4. Bias field correction
- dwibiascorrect fsl $studyData/topup_eddy_done.mif $studyData/dwi_preproc.mif -mask $studyData/preproc_mask.mif -bias $studyData/biasfield.mif
- # performs B1 bias field correction
- # outputs corrected DWI dataset and bias field map
- mrview $studyData/biasfield.mif
- # 5. Mask
- dwi2mask $studyData/dwi_preproc.mif $studyData/mask.mif
- # check this output visually, overlays mask on preprocessed data with low opacity and random colour
- mrview $studyData/dwi_preproc.mif -roi.load $studyData/mask.mif -roi.opacity 0.3 &
preprocessing_pipeline.sh at commit b642271, no license · at the source
Overview
- UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- CUBRIC, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- TÜV SÜD UK, Warrington, UK
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) are objective measures derived from quantitative imaging that can differentiate pathological changes from healthy biological processes. Diffusion MRI parameters derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) could serve as potential QIBs for studying both healthy neurodevelopment and various neurological conditions. However, quantitative neuroimaging studies often require large datasets collected across multiple scanners, which introduces variability. To ensure the reliability of multi‐centre studies, the inter‐centre reproducibility of DTI and NODDI parameters must be thoroughly assessed before data collection begins. Discrepancies between results reported by previous studies can be explained by other sources of variability. The inter‐scanner reproducibility of diffusion parameters needs to be determined when the other sources of variability, such as differences in acquisition parameters, processing and ROI segmentation are controlled for. We assess the reproducibility of DTI and NODDI parameters in clinically relevant white matter (WM) tracts across three scanners of the same model, ensuring consistency in the acquisition scheme and pre‐processing pipelines. WM tract regions of interest (ROIs) are automatically segmented to standardise the analysis. Additionally, we investigate ROI and signal‐to‐noise ratio differences to better understand the sources of variability in diffusion parameters. According to the Koo and Li classification system, our results demonstrate excellent reproducibility for fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity across scanners of the same model (ICC ≥ 0.964) when using identical acquisition schemes, pre‐processing pipelines and automated ROI segmentation. NODDI orientation dispersion index and neurite density index exhibit a similar level of reproducibility (ICC ≥ 0.942 and ICC ≥ 0.911, respectively), while free water fraction (FWF) has ICC ≥ 0.862. However, statistically significant variability was observed in the FWF, specifically within the left inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus (CoV 9.43%) and optic radiation (CoV 9.95%), even when scanning the same cohort across sites. If there is an error in the signal fraction in one compartment in the NODDI model, the signal fractions from other compartments may likely be misestimated. The reproducibility and variability of diffusion parameters reported in this study provide guidance for future QIB research involving datasets derived from multiple scanners. These findings can help determine whether observed changes in diffusion parameters reflect meaningful biological differences or are highly influenced by measurement variability.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above.
aga-sierhej/inter_scanner_reproducibility
b6422713dd2a83a75c89176b8dd905d37593317d, 21 December 2025Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers
- 28 September 2026: the link answers
1 file
- preprocessing_pipeline.s
h , Shell, 38 lines
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data Availability Statement
Research data are not shared. Pre‐processing pipeline script available: https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 8 authors, 7 keywords, 12 MeSH terms, 6 funders, 50 references.
Cite
This paper
Sierhej, A., Correia, M. M., Evans, C. J., Seunarine, K. K., Clayden, J. D., Smith, N. A. S., Hall, M. G., & Clark, C. A. (2026). Multi-Centre Reproducibility of DTI and NODDI in White Matter Tracts Segmented Using TractFinder Across Three MRI Scanners of the Same Model. Human brain mapping, 47(5), e70491. https://
BibTeX
@article{sierhej2026mult
author = {Sierhej, Agnieszka and Correia, Marta M and Evans, C John and Seunarine, Kiran K and Clayden, Jonathan D and Smith, Nadia A S and Hall, Matt G and Clark, Chris A},
title = {{Multi-Centre Reproducibility of DTI and NODDI in White Matter Tracts Segmented Using TractFinder Across Three MRI Scanners of the Same Model}},
journal = {Human brain mapping},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {47},
number = {5},
pages = {e70491},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {1065-9471},
doi = {10.1002/
url = {https://
pmid = {41913049},
pmcid = {PMC13140897}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Sierhej, Agnieszka
AU - Correia, Marta M
AU - Evans, C John
AU - Seunarine, Kiran K
AU - Clayden, Jonathan D
AU - Smith, Nadia A S
AU - Hall, Matt G
AU - Clark, Chris A
TI - Multi-Centre Reproducibility of DTI and NODDI in White Matter Tracts Segmented Using TractFinder Across Three MRI Scanners of the Same Model
T2 - Human brain mapping
J2 - Hum Brain Mapp
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 47
IS - 5
SP - e70491
SN - 1065-9471
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1002/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1002/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Multi-Centre Reproducibility of DTI and NODDI in White Matter Tracts Segmented Using TractFinder Across Three MRI Scanners of the Same Model",
"container-title": "Human brain mapping",
"author": [
{
"family": "Sierhej",
"given": "Agnieszka"
},
{
"family": "Correia",
"given": "Marta M"
},
{
"family": "Evans",
"given": "C John"
},
{
"family": "Seunarine",
"given": "Kiran K"
},
{
"family": "Clayden",
"given": "Jonathan D"
},
{
"family": "Smith",
"given": "Nadia A S"
},
{
"family": "Hall",
"given": "Matt G"
},
{
"family": "Clark",
"given": "Chris A"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "47",
"issue": "5",
"page": "e70491",
"DOI": "10.1002/
"PMID": "41913049",
"PMCID": "PMC13140897",
"ISSN": "1065-9471",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
1
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.3389/fnimg.2026.1873040 [code]
- A rapid streamline-based extension of Tractfinder for white matter tract segmentation.Journal: Frontiers in neuroimagingIn common: MRtrix3, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 7 references
- [2] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aec2348 [code]
- Congenital blindness reduces myelination in human visual cortex.Journal: Science advancesIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 8 references
- [3] doi:10.1002/mds.70355 [code]
- Gray Matter Microstructure Measured Using Diffusion Imaging as a Biomarker of Severity in Lewy Body Diseases.Journal: Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder SocietyIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 7 references
- [4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73072-6 [code]
- Mapping the spatiotemporal continuum of structural connectivity development across the human connectome in youth.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: MRtrix3, structural MRI / diffusion, 6 references
- [5] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag132 [code]
- Spatiotemporal white-matter development across early childhood.Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)In common: MRtrix3, structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
- [6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1325 [code]
- Decoding everyday levels of musical training from subcortical white-matter architecture.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: MRtrix3, structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10454-2 [code]
- White matter micro- and macrostructure brain charts for the human lifespan.Journal: NatureIn common: 6 references
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73366-9 [code]
- Cortical and white matter myelination proceed in concert during early infancy.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: MRtrix3, 4 references
- [9] doi:10.7554/elife.108109 [code]
- Multimodal MRI marker of cognition explains the association between cognition and mental health in the UK Biobank.Journal: eLifeIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 5 references
- [10] doi:10.1162/nol.a.246 [code]
- Bilateral Ventral Pathways Support Phonological Awareness at Reading Onset in Spanish-Speaking Children.Journal: Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 5 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 1 script, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:d1283cacf8b89c88…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
