Brain structure and function in Homo naledi.
The 4 matches
- [1] § Materials and methods › Multiple reconstructions ↔ Lesedi_Endocast_R_publication.R, lines 1–79 · score 0.86 · fixLMtps, missing surfaces, missing landmarks, LES1 reconstruction, fossil hominins, declared
- [2] § Materials and methods › Comparative sample ↔ Lesedi_Endocast_R_publication.R, lines 1–79 · score 0.77 · KNM WT, recent humans, KNM ER, fossil hominins, human adults, LES1 endocast
- [3] § Results ↔ Lesedi_Endocast_R_publication.R, lines 201–251 · score 0.70 · KNM WT, adult sample, full human, KNM ER, Homo erectus, OH
- [4] § Materials and methods › Multiple reconstructions ↔ Lesedi_Endocast_R_publication.R, lines 129–199 · score 0.62 · meshDist, Procrustes distance, morphotypes, pairwise, UPGMA, modern human
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
R · 291 lines · 14 KB · CC-BY-4.0 · 4 matches
- # R code for "Brain structure and function in Homo naledi"
- # (Cofran et al., Brain Structure & Function)
- # Estimate missing landmarks for LES1 endocast
- # geometric morphometric analyses
- # comparing LES1 to recent humans and fossil hominins
- # First, download landmark data Neubauer et al. 2018 dataset: < https://edmond.mpg.de/file.xhtml?fileId=102415&version=1.0 >
- # Also download "Lesedi_Virtual_Endocast.csv" from Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20136569
- # Save these in the default working directory
- library(geomorph); library(Morpho); library(abind); library(Rvcg); library(Arothron); library(dendextend)
- #################### #########################
- # Landmark data input
- #################### #########################
- #----Read and prep Neubauer et al. 2018 landmark data
- d <- read.table('NeubauerEtAl2018-ER42700-endolmdata.txt', header=T)
- # extract individual IDs and convert landmarks array
- id <- d[,1]
- dl <- d[,2:2806]
- dd <- matrix(t(dl), ncol=3, byrow=T)
- da <- arrayspecs(dd, 935, 3)
- # Omit non-adult humans and extra fossil reconstructions
- da <- da[,,c(7:98)]
- id <- id[7:98]
- #----Read and symmetrize Sts 5 & LES1 landmark data
- e <- read.csv("LES1_Sts5_endocast_landmarks_Cofran&al2026.csv")
- ea <- arrayspecs(as.matrix(e[,3:5]), 935, 3)
- eid <- unique(e[,1])
- # symmetrize - vectors for L + R then symmetrize()
- l <- c(9:18,64:101,140:537); r <- c(19:28,102:139, 538:935)
- pairedLM <- cbind(l,r)
- ea <- symmetrize(ea, pairedLM)
- #----Combine and cull landmark datasets to only human adults and fossils
- all <- abind(da,ea)
- ids <- c(id,eid)
- # vectorize fossil and human numbers for subsequent analysis and plots
- f <- c(1,82:94)
- h <- c(2:81)
- ######## ###########
- # Multiple LES1 reconstructions (missing LM estimation)
- ######## ###########
- #----Specify the landmarks missing from the mirrored LES1 endocast
- lmf <- c(1,4:15,17:25,27:29) # missing fixed
- lmc <- c(45:72,77,85:91,100:110,115,123:129,138:139) # missing curve
- # missing surface, left & right sides separate
- lmsl <- c(150,151,152,153,154,156,157,158,204,209,210,211,214,217,218,220,221,225,229,237,238,239,240,245,246,247,247,248,249,250,251,252,254,259,263,264,265,267,270,273,283,284,296,299,300,306,312,313,317,318,322,352,353,356,358,360,365,381,382,383,385,386,387,388,389,390,393,394,414,424,426,430,431,432,433,434,435,436,439,440,441,442,443,444,444,445,446,447,447,448,449,450,452,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,468,469,470,471,473,475,479,480,482,483,484,485,488,489,490,491,495,498,499,500,501,502,503,505,506,508,510,513,514,516,517,537)
- lmsr <- c(lmsl+398)
- #----declare missing data as NA
- all[c(lmf,lmc,lmsl,lmsr),,f[14]] <- NA
- #----estimate missing LMs from fossils
- les.fm <- fixLMtps(all[,,f],weight=T)$out[,,14] # all fossils, weighted by PD
- les.sts <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[13:14]])$out[,,2] # Sts 5 reference
- les.1470 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(11,14)]])$out[,,2] # KNM-ER 1470 reference
- les.1813 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(10,14)]])$out[,,2] # KNM-ER 1813 reference
- les.4270 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(1,14)]])$out[,,2] # KNM-ER 42700 reference
- les.3733 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(2,14)]])$out[,,2] # KNM-ER 3733 reference
- les.3883 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(3,14)]])$out[,,2] # KNM-ER 3883 reference
- les.wt15 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(4,14)]])$out[,,2] # KNM-WT 15000 reference
- les.oh9 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(5,14)]])$out[,,2] # OH9 reference
- les.ng14 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(6,14)]])$out[,,2] # Ngandong 14 reference
- les.ngaw <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(7,14)]])$out[,,2] # Ngawi 1 reference
- les.sm3 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(8,14)]])$out[,,2] # Sambungmacan 3 reference
- les.sg2 <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(9,14)]])$out[,,2] # Sangiran 2 reference
- les.mojo <- fixLMtps(all[,,f[c(12,14)]])$out[,,2] # Mojokerto reference
- # Estimate missing LMs from humans
- les.hs <- fixLMtps(all[,,c(h,f[14])],weight=T)$out[,,81] # all human adults as reference
- ################ #########################
- # Shape analyses & Figures 5-7
- ################ #########################
- #----Procrustes alignment of 80 humans, 13 fossils, 15 recons of LES1 in order of ids[f]
- gpa <- gpagen(abind(all[,,1:93],les.fm,les.4270,les.3733,les.3883, les.wt15,les.oh9,les.ng14,les.ngaw,les.sm3,les.sg2,les.1813,les.1470,les.mojo,les.sts,les.hs))
- #------------------------------------------------------
- # Compare Procrustes distance bw groups (FIG 5, left)
- #------------------------------------------------------
- # Function to calc Procrustes distance between pairs of individuals
- PD <- function(x,y){sqrt(sum((gpa$coords[,,x]-gpa$coords[,,y])^2))}
- # Adult humans first
- pdh <- NA
- for (i in 1:5000) {
- x <- sample(h,2, replace=F) # randomly pick 2
- pdh[i] <- PD(x[1],x[2])
- }
- # Homo erectus adults (excluding Mojo & ER 42700)
- pde <- NA; e1 <- NA; e2 <- NA
- for (i in 1:1000) {
- ee <- sample(f[2:9], 2, replace=F); e1[i] <- min(ee); e2[i] <- max(ee)
- pde[i] <- PD(e1[i],e2[i])
- }
- pex <- data.frame(unique(cbind(ids[e1],ids[e2],pde)))
- # Lesedi (fossil mean recon.) vs. other fossils
- pdi <- NA #; pdi.2 <- NA
- for (i in 1:13) {
- pdi[i] <- PD(94,f[i])
- #pdi.2[i] <- PD(94+i,f[i])
- }
- # pdi.2 compares fossils with fossil-specific LES1 recons
- # Results are similar whether fossil-specific or avg. recon,
- # but Mojokerto- and 42700-specific PDs are much lower
- # Lesedi reconstructions compared to one another
- pdl <- NA
- for (i in 1:500) {
- x <- sample(c(95:108),2)
- pdl[i] <- PD(x[1],x[2])
- }
- pdl <- unique(pdl)
- #----------------------------------------------------
- # Hierarchical cluster analysis (UPGMA, FIG 5, right)
- #----------------------------------------------------
- # cluster dendrogram with human average and fossil adults only
- clusts <- c(18,f[c(2:11,13:14)]) # individual 18 closest to sample avg
- x <- two.d.array(gpa$coords[,,clusts])
- row.names(x) <- ids[clusts]
- endro <- as.dendrogram(hclust(dist(x), method="average"))
- labels_colors(endro) <- c(cola[c(5,3,1,4,2)],"deeppink",cola[rep(2,7)])
- # FIGURE 5
- # Plot comparison of PD, labeling fossil comparisons
- # 1=human, 2=erectus, 3=ER 1813, 4=ER 1470, 5=Sts 5, 6=LES1
- groups <- c(2, rep(1,80), rep(2,8), 3, 4, 2, 5, 6)
- cola <- c(hcl.colors(5,"Zissou"), "deeppink")
- pchs <- c(15:18,1,8)
- par(mar=c(3,4.5,1,2), mfrow=c(1,2))
- boxplot(pdh, pde, pdi, ylab="Procrustes distance", border=c(1,1,0), col=0, names=c("Modern humans", "Homo erectus","LES1"), lty=1, cex=0.5, lwd=c(2,2,2), range=0, cex.lab=1.5, cex.axis=1, main="Pairwise Shape Differences", ylim=c(min(pdl), max(pdi)))
- points(rnorm(91,3,0.01), pdl, col="deeppink", cex=0.5) # LES1 recons
- gx <- rnorm(13,3,0.15)
- points(gx, pdi, col=cola[groups[f]], cex=4, pch=pchs[groups[f]])
- text(gx,pdi, labels=seq(1:13))
- #text(rnorm(13,3,0.05), pdi, labels=ids[f[1:13]], cex=0.8, col=cola[groups[f]]) # color-coded fossil ID labels
- par(mar=c(10,2,2,0))
- plot(as.dendrogram(endro), lwd=2, main="UPGMA cluster analysis", , nodePar = list(lab.cex = 1, pch = NA))
- #-------------------------------------------------
- # Compare LES1 and Aust/Homo morphotypes (FIG 6)
- #-------------------------------------------------
- # Make Human and Homo erectus group averages
- havg <- mshape(gpa$coords[,,h]) # human adult average
- ham <- mshape(gpa$coords[,,f[2:9]]) # all erectus
- # Make triangle meshes for morphotypes
- lem <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(gpa$coords[,,94])) # LES1
- hamm <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(ham)) # erectus average
- hhmm <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(gpa$coords[,,f[10]])) # ER 1813
- hrmm <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(gpa$coords[,,f[11]])) # ER 1470
- amm <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(gpa$coords[,,93])) # sts5
- hsm <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(havg)) # human average
- cold <- c(hcl.colors(3,"Cividis")[1],"white",hcl.colors(3,"Cividis")[3])
- les.st5 <- meshDist(lem,amm, from=-0.00623, to=0.00623, rampcolors = cold)
- les.hab <- meshDist(lem,hhmm, from=-0.00623, to=0.00623, rampcolors = cold)
- les.rud <- meshDist(lem,hrmm, from=-0.00623, to=0.00623, rampcolors = cold)
- les.ere <- meshDist(lem,hamm, from=-0.00623, to=0.00623, rampcolors = cold)
- les.hsa <- meshDist(lem,hsm, from=-0.00623, to=0.00623, rampcolors = cold)
- mfrow3d(2,5, sharedMouse=T)
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- shade3d(amm, col=cola[5], alpha=0.4, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- shade3d(hhmm, col=cola[3], alpha=0.4, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- shade3d(hrmm, col=cola[4], alpha=0.4, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- shade3d(hamm, col=cola[2], alpha=0.4, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- shade3d(hsm, col=cola[1], alpha=0.4, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- spheres3d(gpa$coords[,,95], col=les.st5$cols, r=0.0015, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- spheres3d(gpa$coords[,,95], col=les.hab$cols, r=0.0015, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- spheres3d(gpa$coords[,,95], col=les.rud$cols, r=0.0015, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- spheres3d(gpa$coords[,,95], col=les.ere$cols, r=0.0015, specular="black")
- next3d()
- shade3d(lem, col='whitesmoke', specular="black")
- spheres3d(gpa$coords[,,95], col=les.hsa$cols, r=0.0015, specular="black")
- # (can also color-code triangles rather than landmarks if preferred)
- #mfrow3d(1,5, sharedMouse=T)
- # shade3d(les.st5$colMesh, specular="black"); next3d()
- # shade3d(les.hab$colMesh, specular="black"); next3d()
- # shade3d(les.rud$colMesh, specular="black"); next3d()
- # shade3d(les.ere$colMesh, specular="black"); next3d()
- # shade3d(les.hsa$colMesh, specular="black")
- #-----------------------------------------------------
- # Compare cerebrum vs. cerebellum (PCF) size (FIG 7)
- #-----------------------------------------------------
- # PCF landmarks
- c1 <- c(6,7,15,17,18,25,27,28,29,55:62,64:69,91:101,102:107,129:139)
- c2 <- c(111,144,308,374:376,381,95,382,129,338,94,314,299,96,155,315,333,335,105,332,312,104,97,316,113,310,313,98,309,324,105,312,332,339,328,337,103,168,109,336,334,102,320,329,327,108,331,295,99,323,319,317,291,101,322,321,100,330,157,318,124,326,107,106,325,311,292,214,300,294,112,293,301)+139
- c3 <- c2+398
- pcf <- sort(unique(c(c1,c2,c3)))
- # cerebrum GPA
- cgpa <- gpagen(abind(all[-pcf,,1:93],les.fm[-pcf,]))
- # cerebellum GPA
- pgpa <- gpagen(abind(all[pcf,,1:93],les.fm[pcf,]))
- par(mar=c(4.5,4.5,1,1))
- plot(log10(cgpa$Csize)~log10(pgpa$Csize), col=cola[groups], cex=2, pch=pchs[groups], xlab="log(Cerebellum size)", ylab="log(Cerebrum size)", cex.lab=1.25)
- text(log10(cgpa$Csize)[94]~log10(pgpa$Csize)[94], labels="H. naledi", cex=2, pos=4, col=cola[6])
- legend('topleft',legend=c("Modern human","Homo erectus","KNM-ER 1813","KNM-ER 1470","Australopithecus"), text.col=cola, bty='n', pch=(pchs), col=(cola), cex=1.25)
- abline(lm(log10(cgpa$Csize[h])~log10(pgpa$Csize[h])), col=cola[1], lty=2)
- #shade3d(vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(les.fm)), col="whitesmoke")
- spheres3d(les.fm[-pcf,],r=1.5,col="pink")
- spheres3d(les.fm[pcf,],r=1.5,col="deeppink")
- #################### ########################
- # SUPPORTING INFORMATION
- #################### ########################
- #----------------------------------------------------------
- # Figure S1: Cluster dendrogram with full human adult sample
- #----------------------------------------------------------
- clusts <- c(h,f[c(2:11,13:14)])
- x <- two.d.array(gpa$coords[,,clusts])
- #row.names(x) <- ids[clusts] # original IDs
- # row.names(x)[17] <- "HumanAdult"
- row.names(x) <- c(rep("Modern human", 80), "KNM-ER 3733", "KNM-ER 3883", "KNM-WT 15000", "OH 9", "Ngandong 14", "Ngawi", "Sambungmacan 3", "Sangiran 2", "KNM-ER 1813", "KNM-ER 1470", "Sts 5", "LES1")
- endro <- as.dendrogram(hclust(dist(x), method="average"))
- labels_colors(endro) <- c(cola[c(5, rep(1, 80), 3, 2,2,2,2, 4, 2)],"deeppink",cola[rep(2,3)])
- labels_cex(endro) <- 0.75#c(1, rep(0.75,80), rep(1,7))
- par(mar=c(6,3,2,0))
- plot(as.dendrogram(endro), main="UPGMA cluster analysis")
- #--------------------------------------------
- # Figure S2: PCA of fossil sample
- #--------------------------------------------
- pca <- gm.prcomp(gpa$coords[,,c(1:94)])
- # includes all fossils + LES1 fossil average recon (les.fm)
- par(mfrow=c(1,1), mar=c(4,4,1,1))
- plot(pca, col = cola[groups], pch=pchs[groups], cex=c(2, rep(1.5,80), rep(2,13)), lty=0)
- # text(pca$x[f[-c(10:11,13:14)],1:2], labels=seq(1:10), cex=1, col='white')
- text(pca$x[f[-c(10:11,13:14)],1:2], labels=ids[f[-c(10:11,13:14)]], cex=0.5, pos=c(1,4,4,3,2,1,1,1,1,3))
- legend('topleft', pch=c(pchs,1), col=c(cola,"deeppink"), text.col=c(cola,"deeppink"), legend=c("Modern human", "H. erectus", "H. habilis (ER1813)", "H. rudolfensis (ER1470)", "A. africanus (Sts 5)", "LES1 average"), bty='n')
- # PC shape warps
- pcshape <- pca$shapes
- avg <- vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(mshape(gpa$coords))) # sample average triangle mesh
- pc1min <- pcshape$shapes.comp1$min
- pc1max <- pcshape$shapes.comp1$max
- pc2min <- pcshape$shapes.comp2$min
- pc2max <- pcshape$shapes.comp2$max
- min1 <- warpRefMesh(avg, mshape(gpa$coords), pc1min)
- max1 <- warpRefMesh(avg, mshape(gpa$coords), pc1max)
- min2 <- warpRefMesh(avg, mshape(gpa$coords), pc2min)
- max2 <- warpRefMesh(avg, mshape(gpa$coords), pc2max)
- mfrow3d(2,2, sharedMouse=T)
- shade3d(min1, col="white", specular='black'); next3d()
- shade3d(max1, col='darkgrey', specular='black'); next3d()
- shade3d(min2, col="white", specular='black'); next3d()
- shade3d(max2, col='darkgrey', specular='black')
- #################### #####################
- # Just for fun, LES1 vs human average
- # No size scaling and aligned by basicranium fixed and curve LMs
- #################### #####################
- # just for fun, make a pretty picture of
- bgpa <- procSym(abind(all[,,1:93], les.fm), use.lm=c(1:2,5:29,54:139), CSinit=F, scale=F)
- shade3d(vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(mshape(bgpa$rotated[,,h]))), col='whitesmoke', alpha=0.2, specular='black')
- shade3d(vcgBallPivoting(mesh3d(bgpa$rotated[,,94]), radius=0), col="#D7FF04", alpha=1, specular='black')
Lesedi_Endocast_R_publication.R, under CC-BY-4.0 · at the source
Overview
- Anthropology Department, Vassar College,Poughkeepsie, New York USA
- Department of Biology, University of Indianapolis,Indianapolis, Indiana USA
- Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison, Wisconsin USA
Abstract
Endocasts are casts of the internal surface of skull bones created by the brain and surrounding tissues. These fossil phantoms provide the most direct evidence of the brains of extinct organisms, and are one of the many puzzle pieces that help paleoneurologists reconstruct brain evolution. The recent discovery of a small-brained, recently-extinct human species, Homo naledi, creates a timely opportunity to review what endocasts can and cannot tell us about ancient brains. We first review published evidence about the brain and behavior of H. naledi, including the suggestion that the species may have practiced mortuary behaviors over 230,000 years ago. We next use geometric morphometric methods to reconstruct and the most complete H. naledi endocast and compare it to those of modern humans and Pleistocene hominins. Our results corroborate previous evidence that the brain of H. naledi presents a unique combination of ancestral and modern human-like characteristics, specifically displaying a derived frontal lobe while retaining ancestral sizes, morphology, and cerebro-cerebellar proportions. Finally, we discuss these results in the context of recent paleoanthropological data, advances in neuroimaging, and theoretical frameworks linking brain morphology, structure, and function.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 4 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
Zenodo 20136569
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
1 file
- Lesedi_Endocast_R_public
ation.R , R, 291 lines, 4 matches
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 4 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability
We used landmark data from Neubauer, Simon, 2018, “KNM-ER 42700: endocranial data”, accessible at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 2, 28 September 2026
- Publisher: n/a → Springer Science+Business Media
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 7 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 174 references.
Cite
This paper
Cofran, Z., Hurst, S., & Hawks, J. (2026). Brain structure and function in Homo naledi. Brain structure & function, 231(6), 89. https://
BibTeX
@article{cofran2026brain
author = {Cofran, Zachary and Hurst, Shawn and Hawks, John},
title = {{Brain structure and function in Homo naledi}},
journal = {Brain structure \& function},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {231},
number = {6},
pages = {89},
publisher = {Springer Science+Business Media},
issn = {1863-2653},
doi = {10.1007/
url = {https://
pmid = {42295457},
pmcid = {PMC13269317}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Cofran, Zachary
AU - Hurst, Shawn
AU - Hawks, John
TI - Brain structure and function in Homo naledi
T2 - Brain structure & function
J2 - Brain Struct Funct
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 231
IS - 6
SP - 89
SN - 1863-2653
PB - Springer Science+Business Media
DO - 10.1007/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1007/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Brain structure and function in Homo naledi",
"container-title": "Brain structure & function",
"author": [
{
"family": "Cofran",
"given": "Zachary"
},
{
"family": "Hurst",
"given": "Shawn"
},
{
"family": "Hawks",
"given": "John"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "231",
"issue": "6",
"page": "89",
"DOI": "10.1007/
"PMID": "42295457",
"PMCID": "PMC13269317",
"ISSN": "1863-2653",
"publisher": "Springer Science+Business Media",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
15
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75582-9 [code]
- Biophysical modeling of anatomically realistic prenatal cortical folding development.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 7 references
- [2] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74739-w
- Evolutionary drivers of encephalization and facial reduction in the genus Homo.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: 6 references
- [3] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115766 [code]
- RNA-binding protein family diversification correlates with neural complexity across metazoan evolution.Journal: iScienceIn common: 3 references
- [4] doi:10.1002/hipo.70124 [code]
- Association Between Anterior Hippocampal Gyrification and Episodic Memory Performance in Neurotypical Young Adults.Journal: HippocampusIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, cognitive, 2 references
- [5] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100360 [code]
- CIVET-Chimp: An automated pipeline for MRI-based cortical surface extraction in chimpanzees.Journal: Neuroimage. ReportsIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
- [6] doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08071-4 [code]
- Cerebellar gray matter volume difference in first-episode bipolar and unipolar depression.Journal: BMC psychiatryIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
- [7] doi:10.1093/molbev/msag157 [code]
- Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.Journal: Molecular biology and evolutionIn common: 2 references
- [8] doi:10.1073/pnas.2610646123
- GPIHBP1 on oligodendrocytes binds lipoprotein lipase within the human brain.Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaIn common: 2 references
- [9] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003773
- An anatomical and connectivity atlas of the tree shrew brain to bridge rodent and primate neuroanatomy.Journal: PLoS biologyIn common: structural MRI / diffusion, 2 references
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75661-x [code]
- A neural signature of sleep deprivation in the human brain.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cognitive, 2 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 1 script, and 4 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:87711a272cc50104…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[.
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
