OSCR

A reproducible EEG-ERP methodology for assessing cognitive decline: integrating P300 latency and resting-state EEG frequency.

Overview

Authors: Wojciech Derkowski1, Piotr Derkowski2
  1. WSB Merito University, Augustyna Kośnego 72, 45-372 Opole, Poland
  2. EEG Laboratory in Kluczbork, Poland
Journal: MethodsX, volume 16, article 103986
Dates: received 25 February 2026; accepted 1 June 2026; published online 2 June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986 · PMID 42282912 · PMCID PMC13251188 · OpenAlex W7163141566
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: empty repository (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: EEG (modality), Alzheimer's / dementia (population), methods / tools (subfield)
Methods: Preprocessing, Evoked potentials
Keywords: Electroencephalography, Event-related potentials, P300, Mild cognitive impairment, Dementia, Mini-mental state examination, Methodology
Topic: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 16 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

Zenodo 10614201

License: CC-BY-4.0
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file, 0 scripts
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: the references
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
At the source:

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

  • it says that the data are available on request

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

  • Authors: added Wojciech Derkowski (0000-0003-1115-1210); removed Wojciech Derkowski

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 2 authors, 7 keywords, 10 references.

Cite

This paper

Derkowski, W., & Derkowski, P. (2026). A reproducible EEG-ERP methodology for assessing cognitive decline: integrating P300 latency and resting-state EEG frequency. MethodsX, 16, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986

BibTeX

@article{derkowski2026reproducible,
author = {Derkowski, Wojciech and Derkowski, Piotr},
title = {{A reproducible EEG-ERP methodology for assessing cognitive decline: integrating P300 latency and resting-state EEG frequency}},
journal = {MethodsX},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {16},
pages = {103986},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {2215-0161},
doi = {10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986},
pmid = {42282912},
pmcid = {PMC13251188}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Derkowski, Wojciech
AU - Derkowski, Piotr
TI - A reproducible EEG-ERP methodology for assessing cognitive decline: integrating P300 latency and resting-state EEG frequency
T2 - MethodsX
J2 - MethodsX
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/02
VL - 16
SP - 103986
SN - 2215-0161
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "A reproducible EEG-ERP methodology for assessing cognitive decline: integrating P300 latency and resting-state EEG frequency",
"container-title": "MethodsX",
"author": [
{
"family": "Derkowski",
"given": "Wojciech"
},
{
"family": "Derkowski",
"given": "Piotr"
}
],
"container-title-short": "MethodsX",
"volume": "16",
"page": "103986",
"DOI": "10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986",
"PMID": "42282912",
"PMCID": "PMC13251188",
"ISSN": "2215-0161",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
2
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43132-8 [code]
Cognitive load associates prolonged P300 latency during target stimulus processing in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: Alzheimer's / dementia, EEG, 2 references
[2] doi:10.1111/ejn.70670 [code]
Cross-Night Modulation of Change Detection ERPs to Foreign Speech Sound Features During N2 Sleep.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, 2 references
[3] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1763477
Toward precision EEG: assessing the reliability of individual-level ERPs across EEG systems.
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience
In common: EEG, 2 references
[4] doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00061 [code]
Neural responses to kills/deaths in real MOBA games are associated with addiction-related psychological traits and subjective pleasant/unpleasant experiences.
Journal: Journal of behavioral addictions
In common: EEG, 2 references
[5] doi:10.2147/jpr.s506708
Attention Deficits in Migraine: Mismatch Negativity and P3a in an Event-Related Potential Study.
Journal: Journal of pain research
In common: EEG, 2 references
[6] doi:10.1093/scan/nsaf071
Neural correlates of evaluative bias against artificial intelligence-labeled versus human-labeled artworks.
Journal: Social cognitive and affective neuroscience
In common: EEG, 2 references
[7] doi:10.3390/s23239588
Classification of Targets and Distractors in an Audiovisual Attention Task Based on Electroencephalography.
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: EEG, 2 references
[8] doi:10.1002/hbm.26482
A multimodal cortical network of sensory expectation violation revealed by fMRI.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: EEG, 2 references
[9] doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09899
Cognitive impairment in the co-occurrence of alcohol dependence and major depression: neuropsychological assessment and event-related potentials analyses.
Journal: Heliyon
In common: EEG, 2 references
[10] doi:10.1111/ejn.15730
Formant-invariant voice and pitch representations are pre-attentively formed from constantly varying speech and non-speech stimuli.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Add the badge to the code's README

OSCR: the badge of this paper

If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.

Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->
reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end
HTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103986.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.