OSCR

Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience.

Overview

Authors: Tzvetan Popov1,2
ORCID iDs: Tzvetan Popov
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
  2. Methods of Plasticity Research, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Institutions: University of Konstanz (Germany); University of Zurich (Switzerland)
Journal: Psychophysiology, volume 63, issue 4, article e70303
Dates: received 12 August 2025; accepted 7 April 2026; published online 21 April 2026; in print April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1111/psyp.70303 · PMID 42015609 · PMCID PMC13100568 · OpenAlex W4411669030
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: EEG (modality), human (organism), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Preprocessing, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: action, brain oscillations, brain potentials, cognition, EEG, eye movements
MeSH: Brain*, Cognition*, Cognitive Neuroscience*, Electroencephalography*, Evoked Potentials*, Eye Movements, Humans (* major topic)
Topic: Neural dynamics and brain function (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation (207580, 105314_207580, 105314)
Citations: cited by 1 paper (Europe PMC); 86 references in the paper

Abstract

An axiomatic view in contemporary neuroscience is that EEG components such as event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) and oscillations are directly interpretable as manifestations of biological processes that support sensory, motor, and cognitive constructs of interest. This premise justifies and propels research programs in laboratories worldwide, but with a substantial social and economic cost, warranted by the potential for basic‐science discovery and the resulting bench‐to‐bedside transfer for health and disease. But a different premise would be more fruitful. This article proposes that, in psychophysiological experiments relying on vision, EEG components (e.g., P1‐N170, LPP, and alpha oscillations) relate to cognition indirectly through their more direct relationship with oculomotor action. The common experimental design that includes a baseline ocular fixation period preceding stimulus presentation provides an excellent template with which to develop the present proposal. Electrophysiological and eye‐tracking evidence (3 published and 4 new data sets: 7 experiments, Ntotal = 421, in the context of face and affective picture viewing, reading, listening, rest, microsleep and eye movements under closed eye lids), together with simulations grounded in empirically observed oculomotor dynamics, demonstrate how and why common conclusions, and reliance on them in clinical practice/treatment efficacy and drug development studies, are at best premature. Results indicate that the oculomotor system plays a mediating role between such EEG phenomena and cognition. Present evidence supports a complementary view of how EEG can shape the development of a broader thought horizon in psychophysiological theory and practice.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

OSF q4mez

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 28 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 16 files
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Data and Code Availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
At the source: osf.io/q4mez/

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in osf.io at https://osf.io/q4mez/, reference number q4mez.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Data Availability Statement

All data and the code necessary to reproduce present results are available at [https://osf.io/q4mez/].

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in osf.io at https://osf.io/q4mez/, reference number q4mez.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

  • Publisher: n/a → Wiley

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 1 author, 6 keywords, 7 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 76 references.

Cite

This paper

Popov, T. (2026). Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience. Psychophysiology, 63(4), e70303. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70303

BibTeX

@article{popov2026misinterpreting,
author = {Popov, Tzvetan},
title = {{Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience}},
journal = {Psychophysiology},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {63},
number = {4},
pages = {e70303},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {0048-5772},
doi = {10.1111/psyp.70303},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70303},
pmid = {42015609},
pmcid = {PMC13100568}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Popov, Tzvetan
TI - Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience
T2 - Psychophysiology
J2 - Psychophysiology
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/01
VL - 63
IS - 4
SP - e70303
SN - 0048-5772
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1111/psyp.70303
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70303
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1111/psyp.70303",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience",
"container-title": "Psychophysiology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Popov",
"given": "Tzvetan"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Psychophysiology",
"volume": "63",
"issue": "4",
"page": "e70303",
"DOI": "10.1111/psyp.70303",
"PMID": "42015609",
"PMCID": "PMC13100568",
"ISSN": "0048-5772",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70303",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
1
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1186/s11689-026-09706-z [code]
Neural oscillatory dynamics reveal altered top-down and integrative mechanisms during face processing in autistic children and unaffected siblings of autistic children.
Journal: Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders
In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references
[2] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73916-1 [code]
Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references
[3] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1791453 [code]
Differential role of beta band activity in a dual-task working memory paradigm under internally vs. externally directed cognition.
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references
[4] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0076-26.2026 [code]
Exogenously Driven Neural Reactivation of Spatially Matching Visual Working-Memory Contents.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[5] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116936 [code]
Beyond neural oscillations: Stress-related aperiodic activity and aperiodic-oscillatory spectral covariation.
Journal: iScience
In common: EEG, 3 references
[6] doi:10.1111/psyp.70341 [code]
The Brain Signature of Reward Processing During Cooperative Gaming.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[7] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.114575
Reduced cortical excitability is associated with head impact severity and cognitive symptoms in adolescent football players
Journal: n/a
In common: 3 references
[8] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01446-w
People, places, and things: The impact of scene animacy on emotional modulation of the early posterior negativity.
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[9] doi:10.7554/elife.106050
Cross-modal interaction of human alpha activity does not reflect inhibition of early sensory processing in a frequency-tagging study using EEG and MEG.
Journal: eLife
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[10] doi:10.7554/elife.108408 [code]
Frequency and laminar profile of feature-specific visual activity revealed by interleaved EEG-fMRI.
Journal: eLife
In common: EEG, 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.