OSCR

Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI.

Code ↔ Paper

8 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 8 matches
  1. [1] § Methods › Data processing › Segmentation ↔ scripts/plots_and_analyses/supp_plot_iterative_removal.r, lines 1–80 · score 0.76 · cortical gray matter, eCSF, basal ganglia, lateral ventricles, brainstem, thalamus
  2. [2] § Methods › Data processing › Segmentation ↔ scripts/plots_and_analyses/1_plot_main.r, lines 1–39 · score 0.75 · cortical gray matter, eCSF, basal ganglia, lateral ventricles, brainstem, thalamus
  3. [3] § Results › Poor-quality images can bias normative trajectories ↔ notebooks/1_harmonize_data.ipynb, lines 539–558 · score 0.74 · cortical gray matter, eCSF, basal ganglia, lateral ventricles, cerebellar volume, brainstem
  4. [4] § Results › Poor-quality images can bias normative trajectories ↔ scripts/plots_and_analyses/1_plot_main.r, lines 1–39 · score 0.74 · cortical gray matter, eCSF, basal ganglia, lateral ventricles, cerebellar volume, brainstem
  5. [5] § Methods › Data processing › Super-resolution reconstruction ↔ fetpype/pipelines/full_pipeline.py, lines 26–104 · score 0.65 · bias field correction, brain extraction, denoising, resolution, preprocessing, stacks
  6. [6] § Results › Poor-quality images can bias normative trajectories ↔ scripts/plots_and_analyses/supp_plot_iterative_removal.r, lines 1–80 · score 0.60 · lateral ventricles volume, white matter volume, cerebellar volume, confidence, bootstrap, centile
  7. [7] § Methods › Analysis of the impact of image quality on normative models › Harmonization on volumetric measurements ↔ notebooks/1_harmonize_data.ipynb, lines 197–283 · score 0.58 · ComBat, GroundTruth, GAM, smoothing, spline, harmonized
  8. [8] § Methods › Analysis of the impact of image quality on normative models › QC subgroups definition ↔ notebooks/1_harmonize_data.ipynb, lines 36–86 · score 0.50 · global quality score, excellent quality, cohorts, scans

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

Jupyter notebook · 814 lines · 38 KB · no license · 3 matches

The registry keeps no copy of this file: its repository has no license, so its authors keep all their rights to it. Your browser shows it from its source, with JavaScript.

It can be read at the source: notebooks/1_harmonize_data.ipynb.

Overview

13 affiliations
  1. CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. Department of Medical Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  3. Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
  4. BCN MedTech, Department of Engineering, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  5. APHM, Service de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, Hôpital de la Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
  6. APHM, Service de Neurologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital de la Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
  7. Aix Marseille University, Inserm, Marseille, France
  8. BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain
  9. Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
  10. Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain
  11. Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  12. School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
  13. ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), volume 4, article IMAG.a.1337
Dates: received 22 January 2026; accepted 17 July 2026; published online 14 August 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1162/imag.a.1337 · PMID 42609916 · PMCID PMC13479347 · OpenAlex W7171370507
Open access: diamond, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: structural MRI / diffusion (modality)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: fetal, brain MRI, normative modeling, image artifacts, quality control
Topic: Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation (31NE30_203977, 205320-215641); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-NEU2-0005, ANR-19-CE45-0014); Instituto de Salud Carlos III (AC21_2/00016); Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 42 references in the paper

Abstract

Normative modeling is increasingly used to characterize typical growth trajectories and identify atypical neurodevelopment, including early brain development using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquired before birth. Recent work has emphasized the importance of large sample sizes for accurate and robust centile estimation. In this study, we investigate how image quality influences fetal brain normative models, a critical factor in this context where MRI is acquired on a moving fetus in utero. Using a multi-centric cohort of 635 fetal MRI scans, we applied a standardized visual quality control (QC) protocol with continuous quality ratings. We fit normative models for multiple brain structures under progressively relaxed QC stringency, and quantified the deviations in centile estimates relative to a high-quality reference subgroup. Our results showed that including lower-quality data systematically biased normative centiles, with the strongest effects observed in the outer centiles, particularly the lower tail (1st–10th). Bias increased progressively as QC stringency was relaxed and could not be attributed solely to the number of scans used to fit the models. Quality-induced bias was structure dependent, and often not visually apparent at the segmentation level. These findings highlight that image quality is an important source of bias in normative fetal brain modeling, and that increasing sample size at the expense of quality may systematically affect centile estimates, potentially jeopardizing the utility of the model.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repositories

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 8 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

fetpype/fetpype

License: MIT
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: 5c99de9a3b35734b2fa71b5fcde2920cb9b1d93b, 3 September 2026
Languages: Python (27)
Size: 99 files, 27 scripts
Software Heritage: archived
Found in: the end of the paper
Holds: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment (pyproject.toml), tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: Nipype (10 files), NiBabel (2 files), NumPy (2 files), FSL (1 file), pandas (1 file), PyBIDS (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers
29 files

fetpype/normative_modeling_data_quality

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: 24d93cbe628568ac5ff3df680bd6046fdd8e393e, 22 July 2026
Languages: R (10), Jupyter (1), Python (1)
Size: 13 files, 12 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Data and Code Availability”
Holds: README, 1 notebook
Not found: license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: tidyverse (10 files), ggplot2 (9 files), patchwork (6 files), cowplot (4 files), mgcv (4 files), neuroHarmonize (2 files), NumPy (2 files), pandas (2 files), scikit-learn (2 files), Matplotlib (1 file), nlme (1 file), SciPy (1 file), seaborn (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers
13 files, not copied: shown from their source

OSCR keeps no copy of these files: this repository has no license that allows it. The reader above shows each one from its source, fetched by your browser at commit 24d93cb, when its fingerprint is the one OSCR verified. How this works.

Zenodo 15696638

License: CC-BY-4.0
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file, 0 scripts
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: the references
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
At the source:

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 3 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 39 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 8 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

Datasets cited

Data and Code Availability

Tabular data (estimated volumes data and corresponding data quality for each scan) are available on a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21485414. The code is publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/fetpype/normative_modeling_data_quality. Sharing of the reconstructed images and segmentations requires data transfer agreements with each of the centers.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 16 authors, 5 keywords, 4 funders, 42 references.

Cite

This paper

Sanchez, T., Mihailov, A., Martí-Juan, G., Girard, N., Manchon, A., Milh, M., Eixarch, E., Dunet, V., Koob, M., Pomar, L., Sichitiu, J., González Ballester, M. A., Camara, O., Piella, G., Bach Cuadra, M., & Auzias, G. (2026). Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 4, IMAG.a.1337. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1337

BibTeX

@article{sanchez2026data,
author = {Sanchez, Thomas and Mihailov, Angeline and Martí-Juan, Gerard and Girard, Nadine and Manchon, Aurélie and Milh, Mathieu and Eixarch, Elisenda and Dunet, Vincent and Koob, Mériam and Pomar, Léo and Sichitiu, Joanna and González Ballester, Miguel A. and Camara, Oscar and Piella, Gemma and Bach Cuadra, Meritxell and Auzias, Guillaume},
title = {{Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI}},
journal = {Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
volume = {4},
pages = {IMAG.a.1337},
publisher = {MIT Press},
issn = {2837-6056},
doi = {10.1162/imag.a.1337},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1337},
pmid = {42609916},
pmcid = {PMC13479347}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Sanchez, Thomas
AU - Mihailov, Angeline
AU - Martí-Juan, Gerard
AU - Girard, Nadine
AU - Manchon, Aurélie
AU - Milh, Mathieu
AU - Eixarch, Elisenda
AU - Dunet, Vincent
AU - Koob, Mériam
AU - Pomar, Léo
AU - Sichitiu, Joanna
AU - González Ballester, Miguel A.
AU - Camara, Oscar
AU - Piella, Gemma
AU - Bach Cuadra, Meritxell
AU - Auzias, Guillaume
TI - Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI
T2 - Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
J2 - Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/14
VL - 4
SP - IMAG.a.1337
SN - 2837-6056
PB - MIT Press
DO - 10.1162/imag.a.1337
UR - https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1337
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1162/imag.a.1337",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI",
"container-title": "Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Sanchez",
"given": "Thomas"
},
{
"family": "Mihailov",
"given": "Angeline"
},
{
"family": "Martí-Juan",
"given": "Gerard"
},
{
"family": "Girard",
"given": "Nadine"
},
{
"family": "Manchon",
"given": "Aurélie"
},
{
"family": "Milh",
"given": "Mathieu"
},
{
"family": "Eixarch",
"given": "Elisenda"
},
{
"family": "Dunet",
"given": "Vincent"
},
{
"family": "Koob",
"given": "Mériam"
},
{
"family": "Pomar",
"given": "Léo"
},
{
"family": "Sichitiu",
"given": "Joanna"
},
{
"family": "González Ballester",
"given": "Miguel A."
},
{
"family": "Camara",
"given": "Oscar"
},
{
"family": "Piella",
"given": "Gemma"
},
{
"family": "Bach Cuadra",
"given": "Meritxell"
},
{
"family": "Auzias",
"given": "Guillaume"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Imaging Neurosci (Camb)",
"volume": "4",
"page": "IMAG.a.1337",
"DOI": "10.1162/imag.a.1337",
"PMID": "42609916",
"PMCID": "PMC13479347",
"ISSN": "2837-6056",
"publisher": "MIT Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1337",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
14
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73072-6 [code]
Mapping the spatiotemporal continuum of structural connectivity development across the human connectome in youth.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: neuroHarmonize, mgcv, patchwork, 5 other tools, structural MRI / diffusion, 4 references
[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1269 [code]
From early to contemporary normative modeling: Mapping individual differences in neurophysiological signals.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: NiBabel, seaborn, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, 7 references
[3] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1347 [code]
Neural and behavioural correlates of theory of mind reasoning in five-year-old children born preterm.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: PyBIDS, Nipype, FSL, 9 other tools
[4] doi:10.1002/hbm.70605 [code]
BrainEnrich: Revealing Biological Insights for Imaging-Derived Phenotypes Through Transcriptomic Enrichment.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: nlme, cowplot, patchwork, 9 other tools, 1 reference
[5] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1245 [code]
Towards precision EEG connectomics: Evaluating the benefits of dense sampling.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: Nipype, FSL, cowplot, 9 other tools
[6] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101765 [code]
Fusiform face area development correlates with development in higher-order social brain regions.
Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscience
In common: PyBIDS, Nipype, FSL, 8 other tools
[7] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10276-y [code]
The cellular correlates and adolescent reorganisation of cortical myelination networks in the common marmoset.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: Nipype, mgcv, patchwork, 8 other tools, structural MRI / diffusion
[8] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1276 [code]
High-resolution whole-brain magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in youth at risk for psychosis.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: FSL, NiBabel, seaborn, 5 other tools, author Meritxell Bach Cuadra
[9] doi:10.1093/nc/niag029 [code]
A data-driven approach to identifying and evaluating connectivity-based neural correlates of conscious visual perception.
Journal: Neuroscience of consciousness
In common: FSL, cowplot, patchwork, 9 other tools
[10] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1873417 [code]
Functional brain network alterations in a rat model of dental malocclusion.
Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience
In common: PyBIDS, Nipype, FSL, 7 other tools

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.