OSCR

Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain.

Code ↔ Paper

6 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 6 matches · 5 of them tie a paragraph to a whole file, not to given lines: weak matches, whose lines are not tinted
  1. [1] § METHODS › Neural-Oscillatory Measures › Target power. ↔ observed/observed.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.83 · 14–24 Hz, 30–59 Hz, 60–80 Hz, 8–12 Hz, 4–6 Hz, 14 Hz
  2. [2] § METHODS › Neural-Oscillatory Measures › Target power. ↔ surrogate/surrogate.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.83 · 14–24 Hz, 30–59 Hz, 60–80 Hz, 8–12 Hz, 4–6 Hz, 14 Hz
  3. [3] § METHODS › Processing › Structural connectivity. ↔ surrogate/surrogate.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.69 · inter hemispheric connections, MICA MICs, binarized, Destrieux, OMEGA, SC
  4. [4] § METHODS › Processing › Structural connectivity. ↔ observed/observed.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.69 · inter hemispheric connections, MICA MICs, binarized, Destrieux, OMEGA, SC
  5. [5] § METHODS › Functional Gradient Analysis ↔ gradientAnalysis.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.52 · diffusion embedding, gradients, flipped, FC, HCP
  6. [6] § RESULTS › Dependence of Communication on Phase Coherence ↔ visualise.m, lines 2–60 · score 0.50 · beta coherence, alpha coherence, gamma lo, gamma hi, theta, power

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

MATLAB · 61 lines · 4.1 KB · no license · 2 matches

  1. % Main script that calls EWC and neural osc functions - generates the communication principles for 1 subject (NOT SURROGATE CORRECTED) - repeat over subs to generate observed/original dataset
  2. addpath(genpath('../funcs/'));
  3. sub % sub index
  4. N = 100; % Number of regions % 100 for schaefer (HCP), 148 for Destrieux (OMEGA)
  5. Fs = 2035; % Sampling frequency (Hz) % 2400 for OMEGA, 2035 for HCP
  6. thresh=3;
  7. recording=load(sprintf("flex-comm-principles/data/HCP/%d_resting.mat",sub));
  8. main_data=recording.main_data;
  9. delay=recording.delay; % Delay between regions, in seconds, converted to timesteps
  10. load("flex-comm-principles/data/HCP/SC_ds_hcp_tract_pro_ctx_sch7n100p_sctx_na_n_100_m_1000_group_cnss_slcthr_5_nf_pa.mat") % For HCP (main text results) loads the group normative SC
  11. % SC=load("flex-comm-principles/data/OMEGA/MICA_MICS_destrieux_group_SC.txt") % For HCP (main text results) loads the group normative SC
  12. % -------COMMENT OUT THIS BLOCK IF USING MICA-MICS SC------
  13. SC=threshold_proportional(SC,0.15); % Keep top 15% connections
  14. SC(SC>0)=1; % Binarize
  15. SC(1:N/2,N/2+1:end)=0; % Remove inter hemispheric connections
  16. SC(N/2+1:end,1:N/2)=0; % ^^^
  17. %----------------------------------------------------------
  18. main_bandpass(:,:,1)=bandpass(main_data,[4,6],Fs);
  19. main_bandpass(:,:,2)=bandpass(main_data,[8,12],Fs);
  20. main_bandpass(:,:,3)=bandpass(main_data,[14,24],Fs);
  21. main_bandpass(:,:,4)=bandpass(main_data,[30,59],Fs);
  22. main_bandpass(:,:,5)=bandpass(main_data,[60,80],Fs);
  23. epoch = 10*Fs; % 10 second epochs
  24. win = 1*Fs; % 1 second window
  25. numepochs=floor(size(main_data,1)/epoch);
  26. P = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  27. P_std = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  28. Tpow = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  29. Apow = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  30. Bpow = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  31. Glopow = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  32. Ghipow = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  33. PLV_theta = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  34. PLV_alpha = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  35. PLV_beta = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  36. PLV_gammalo = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  37. PLV_gammahi = zeros(N,N,numepochs);
  38. for s=1:numepochs
  39. data = main_data(((s-1)*epoch)+1:(s*epoch),:);
  40. bandpassSig=hilbert(main_bandpass(((s-1)*epoch)+1:(s*epoch),:,:));
  41. sigevents = eventiden(data,delay,win,thresh);
  42. [P(:,:,s),~]=PearsonEWC(data,SC,win,N,delay,sigevents); % Mean PC over all significant events in target region
  43. [Tpow(:,:,s),Apow(:,:,s),Bpow(:,:,s),Glopow(:,:,s),Ghipow(:,:,s),PLV_theta(:,:,s),PLV_alpha(:,:,s),PLV_beta(:,:,s),PLV_gammalo(:,:,s),PLV_gammahi(:,:,s)] = neural_osc(data,bandpassSig,SC,win,N,delay,sigevents,Fs);
  44. end
  45. P = abs(P);
  46. comm_principle_mean = zeros(N,10);
  47. for i=1:N
  48. comm_principle_mean(i,1)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(Tpow(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  49. comm_principle_mean(i,2)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(Apow(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  50. comm_principle_mean(i,3)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(Bpow(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  51. comm_principle_mean(i,4)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(Glopow(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  52. comm_principle_mean(i,5)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(Ghipow(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  53. comm_principle_mean(i,6)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(PLV_theta(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  54. comm_principle_mean(i,7)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(PLV_alpha(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  55. comm_principle_mean(i,8)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(PLV_beta(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  56. comm_principle_mean(i,9)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(PLV_gammalo(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  57. comm_principle_mean(i,10)=corr(reshape(squeeze(P(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1),reshape(squeeze(PLV_gammahi(i,find(SC(i,:)),:)),[],1));
  58. end
  59. comm_principle_mean(isnan(comm_principle_mean))=0;
  60. save(sprintf("%d_results",sub),"comm_principle_mean","Tpow","Apow","Bpow","Glopow","Ghipow","PLV_theta","PLV_alpha","PLV_beta","PLV_gammalo","PLV_gammahi","P")

observed.m at commit 4c02558, no license · at the source

Overview

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  2. The Vermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
  3. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
  4. Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  5. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
Institutions: The University of Melbourne (Australia); University of Vermont (United States); The University of Queensland (Australia); Indiana University Bloomington (United States); Indiana University (United States)
Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), volume 10, issue 2, pages 508-530
Dates: received 17 October 2025; accepted 26 January 2026; published online 22 April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1162/netn.a.550 · PMID 42039093 · PMCID PMC13108498 · OpenAlex W7128158001
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: MEG (modality), human (organism), systems (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Preprocessing, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Connectivity, Machine learning, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: Communication, Neural oscillations, MEG, Connectome
Topic: Neural dynamics and brain function (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 86 references in the paper

Abstract

How the brain orchestrates the flow of information between its multiple functional units flexibly, quickly, and accurately remains a fundamental question in neuroscience. Multiple theories identify neural oscillations as a likely basis for this process. However, a lack of empirical validation of proposed theories, particularly at the whole-brain scale, has hampered consensus on oscillatory principles governing neural communication, limiting our understanding of a process central to perception and cognition and its integration into experiments and clinical applications. Here, we empirically validate previously proposed neural-oscillatory communication mechanisms in the human brain—specifically involving power and inter-areal phase coherence—at the whole-brain scale. We do this by estimating the dependence of inferred communication on oscillatory measures that have been theorized to facilitate communication, in source-localized resting-state magnetoencephalography recordings. We find that power and phase coherence in the alpha, beta, and high-gamma bands track communication better than others. Crucially, the relation between communication and oscillatory measures varied across regions, indicating spatial heterogeneity in routing mechanisms. Notably, power and coherence-based principles tracked communication patterns of unimodal regions better than those of transmodal regions. In sum, these findings suggest that the human brain implements regionally specific communication mechanisms with complex neural-oscillatory dependence.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 6 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

vmadanmohan/flex-comm-principles

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 29 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: 4c0255825f918e8ec20f8f7c6568bdb9ecfbe291, 18 May 2026
Languages: MATLAB (11), Shell (1)
Size: 93 files, 12 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “DATA AND CODE AVAILABILITY”
Holds: README
Not found: license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 29 September 2026: the link answers
  • 29 September 2026: the link answers
13 files

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 12 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 6 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

Datasets cited

Data and code availability

All the code used to analyze data is available at https://github.com/vmadanmohan/flex-comm-principles.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 4 keywords, 7 funders, 82 references.

Cite

This paper

Madan Mohan, V., Varley, T. F., Harris, A. M., Cash, R. F. H., Seguin, C., & Zalesky, A. (2026). Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain. Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 10(2), 508-530. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn.a.550

BibTeX

@article{madanmohan2026evaluating,
author = {Madan Mohan, Varun and Varley, Thomas F and Harris, Anthony M and Cash, Robin F H and Seguin, Caio and Zalesky, Andrew},
title = {{Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain}},
journal = {Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {508--530},
publisher = {MIT Press},
issn = {2472-1751},
doi = {10.1162/netn.a.550},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/netn.a.550},
pmid = {42039093},
pmcid = {PMC13108498}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Madan Mohan, Varun
AU - Varley, Thomas F
AU - Harris, Anthony M
AU - Cash, Robin F H
AU - Seguin, Caio
AU - Zalesky, Andrew
TI - Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain
T2 - Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
J2 - Netw Neurosci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/22
VL - 10
IS - 2
SP - 508
EP - 530
SN - 2472-1751
PB - MIT Press
DO - 10.1162/netn.a.550
UR - https://doi.org/10.1162/netn.a.550
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1162/netn.a.550",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain",
"container-title": "Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Madan Mohan",
"given": "Varun"
},
{
"family": "Varley",
"given": "Thomas F"
},
{
"family": "Harris",
"given": "Anthony M"
},
{
"family": "Cash",
"given": "Robin F H"
},
{
"family": "Seguin",
"given": "Caio"
},
{
"family": "Zalesky",
"given": "Andrew"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Netw Neurosci",
"volume": "10",
"issue": "2",
"page": "508-530",
"DOI": "10.1162/netn.a.550",
"PMID": "42039093",
"PMCID": "PMC13108498",
"ISSN": "2472-1751",
"publisher": "MIT Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1162/netn.a.550",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
22
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1002/hbm.70533 [code]
Trait-Relevant Tasks Improve Personality Prediction From Structural-Functional Brain Network Coupling.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: Brain Connectivity Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 11 references, author Caio Seguin
[2] doi:10.7554/elife.103097 [code]
Canonical neurodevelopmental trajectories of structural and functional manifolds.
Journal: eLife
In common: Brain Connectivity Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 8 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09444-3 [code]
Decoupling of neurophysiological activity from structure mirrors global microarchitectural and neuromodulatory trends.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: Brain Connectivity Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, MEG, 6 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76011-7 [code]
Human cortex organizes dynamic co-fluctuations along the sensorimotor-association axis.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Brain Connectivity Toolbox, Signal Processing Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, systems, 5 references
[5] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003927 [code]
Brain structural and functional connectivity converge prenatally but diverge after birth.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: Brain Connectivity Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 6 references
[6] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aef2894 [code]
Human cortical networks trade communication efficiency for computational reliability.
Journal: Science advances
In common: 8 references
[7] doi:10.7554/elife.108408 [code]
Frequency and laminar profile of feature-specific visual activity revealed by interleaved EEG-fMRI.
Journal: eLife
In common: Signal Processing Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, systems, 5 references
[8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73553-8 [code]
Universal rhythmic architecture uncovers two modes of neural dynamics.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Signal Processing Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 5 references
[9] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0012-26.2026 [code]
I Can't Hear You Both at the Same Time: A Temporal Dilemma During Inter-Regional Communication.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: Signal Processing Toolbox, systems, 5 references
[10] doi:10.1111/psyp.70345 [code]
sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: MEG, 6 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.