Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC).
Overview
- Faculty of Health and Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Universidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke often causes spasticity, impacting mobility and quality of life. Botulinum Toxin type A (BTX-A) and Dry Needling (DN) are treatments that reduce spasticity, although Botulinum Toxin type A injections can cause adverse effects. No studies have directly compared their effects at spinal, muscular, functional, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness levels. This study aims to determine the spinal mechanisms of BTX-A and DN on post-stroke lower limb spasticity, while also assessing feasibility, safety, and exploratory effects at muscular, functional, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness levels.
Methods and analysis: This is a protocol of a proof-of-concept, feasibility randomized clinical trial including 90 participants from Canada, Belgium, and Spain who experienced a first stroke in the previous 12 months and present plantar flexor spasticity. Time since stroke (0–12 months) will be recorded and explored as a potential modifier of treatment response. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either one session of BTX-A or 12 weekly sessions of DN. Blinded evaluators will assess outcomes before, during, and after treatment, with a 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome will be spinal mechanisms of spasticity, measured using the Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold and its velocity sensitivity. Secondary outcomes will assess: a) muscular architecture and echotexture (measured with ultrasound); b) muscle tone/
Ethics and Dissemination: This research project has secured funding from the NEURON ERA-NET 2022 call, supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program (GA 964215) and co-funded by the European Union-Next Generation, and has undergone peer review. Ethical approval has been obtained from Spain, Canada, and Belgium. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06296082) and the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) under the number 2024-510866-18-00. The study protocol is registered on Zenodo (https://
Clinical Trials: Clinical Trials NCT06296082; https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.
Tracing map
A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.
Data
Datasets cited
- zenodo:20034064, at Zenodo; found in “Data deposition and curation”
Data Availability
The study protocol and supporting documentation are publicly available on Zenodo at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Data deposition and curation
The STROKE-POC project data are publicly available on Zenodo at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 2, 28 September 2026
- Funding: added European Commission: 964215; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek: 49317; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé: 324226; Instituto de Salud Carlos III: AC22/00016; H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology: GA 964215
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 8 authors, 19 MeSH terms, 47 references.
Cite
This paper
Pujol-Fuentes, C., Eeckhaut, B., Fernández Carnero, S., Fernández Sanchís, D., Wein, T., Herrero, P., Saeys, W., & Levin, M. F. (2026). Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC). PloS one, 21(5), e0334571. https://
BibTeX
@article{pujolfuentes202
author = {Pujol-Fuentes, Clara and Eeckhaut, Bart and Fernández Carnero, Samuel and Fernández Sanchís, Daniel and Wein, Theodore and Herrero, Pablo and Saeys, Wim and Levin, Mindy F},
title = {{Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC)}},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {21},
number = {5},
pages = {e0334571},
publisher = {PLOS},
issn = {1932-6203},
doi = {10.1371/
url = {https://
pmid = {42160369},
pmcid = {PMC13189288}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Pujol-Fuentes, Clara
AU - Eeckhaut, Bart
AU - Fernández Carnero, Samuel
AU - Fernández Sanchís, Daniel
AU - Wein, Theodore
AU - Herrero, Pablo
AU - Saeys, Wim
AU - Levin, Mindy F
TI - Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC)
T2 - PloS one
J2 - PLoS One
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 21
IS - 5
SP - e0334571
SN - 1932-6203
PB - PLOS
DO - 10.1371/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1371/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Spinal mechanisms and feasibility of Dry Needling versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: A proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial protocol (STROKE-POC)",
"container-title": "PloS one",
"author": [
{
"family": "Pujol-Fuentes",
"given": "Clara"
},
{
"family": "Eeckhaut",
"given": "Bart"
},
{
"family": "Fernández Carnero",
"given": "Samuel"
},
{
"family": "Fernández Sanchís",
"given": "Daniel"
},
{
"family": "Wein",
"given": "Theodore"
},
{
"family": "Herrero",
"given": "Pablo"
},
{
"family": "Saeys",
"given": "Wim"
},
{
"family": "Levin",
"given": "Mindy F"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "21",
"issue": "5",
"page": "e0334571",
"DOI": "10.1371/
"PMID": "42160369",
"PMCID": "PMC13189288",
"ISSN": "1932-6203",
"publisher": "PLOS",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
20
]
]
}
}
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101034 [code]
- Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a randomized sham-controlled trial.Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)In common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [2] doi:10.1161/jaha.125.047556
- Evaluating and Mitigating Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Emissions in Stroke Management: A Modeling Study.Journal: Journal of the American Heart AssociationIn common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [3] doi:10.1186/s12866-026-05351-7
- Integrated analysis of gut microbiota, serum metabolomics, and proteomics reveals novel associations with clinical symptoms in patients with cerebral infarction.Journal: BMC microbiologyIn common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [4] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57238-2
- Cardiac biomarkers combined with neuroimaging localization predict long-term outcomes in acute stroke patients.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [5] doi:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2026.260137 [code]
- Life&
lt;b& gt;'& lt;/ b& gt;s Essential 10 and brain health: A prospective cohort study. Journal: Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciencesIn common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference - [6] doi:10.1155/humu/4033506
- SELL Marks an Effector-Deficient CD8&
lt;sup& gt;+& lt;/ sup& gt; T Cell Subset That Promotes Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Responds to Rutin Therapy. Journal: Human mutationIn common: stroke, clinical / translational, 1 reference - [7] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag322 [code]
- Genomic insights into stroke recovery: cross-phenotype associations.Journal: Brain communicationsIn common: stroke, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1186/s12929-026-01271-w
- Lack of cortistatin drives neuroimmune and vascular dysfunction in brain ischemia.Journal: Journal of biomedical scienceIn common: stroke, 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1186/s12984-026-02048-w
- Functional reorganization of the contralesional precentral gyrus following acute subcortical ischemic stroke and its association with gene expression profile.Journal: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitationIn common: stroke, 1 reference
- [10] doi:10.1002/advs.202518421
- Modulation of miR-23b Wnt/
β-catenin Axis Strengthens Endothelial Barrier Properties. Journal: Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)In common: stroke, 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
