Cryopreservation of aldehyde-fixed whole brains.
The 2 matches
- [1] § Materials and methods › Histological methods ↔ cryo_em_data_analysis.R, lines 1–55 · score 0.70 · Mann Whitney, Hodges Lehmann shift, cryopreserved control, probability, AUC, rank
- [2] § Results › Histological assessment of the refined protocol ↔ cryo_em_data_analysis.R, lines 1–55 · score 0.66 · Mann Whitney, Hodges Lehmann shift, cryopreserved control, bootstrap, AUC, rank
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
R · 97 lines · 3.7 KB · no license · 2 matches
- library(irr)
- library(ggplot2)
- df <- read.delim("Cryo\ blinding\ -\ org\ sheet.tsv", sep = "\t", header = TRUE)
- # Fix column names
- colnames(df) <- c("sample", "image", "number", "m_score", "a_score")
- # Note: "N" = Non-Cryopreserved control, "C" = "Cryopreserved"
- # Fill down sample IDs (they're only on first row of each sample)
- current_sample <- ""
- for (i in 1:nrow(df)) {
- if (df$sample[i] != "" && !is.na(df$sample[i])) {
- current_sample <- df$sample[i]
- } else {
- df$sample[i] <- current_sample
- }
- }
- # Extract group (c vs n) from sample name
- df$group <- ifelse(grepl("^c", df$sample), "c", "n")
- # Average raters, then aggregate to sample level
- df$combined <- rowMeans(df[c("m_score", "a_score")])
- sample_means <- aggregate(combined ~ sample + group, data = df, FUN = mean)
- cat("=== Group Comparison ===\n")
- aggregate(combined ~ group, data = sample_means,
- FUN = function(x) c(n = length(x), mean = round(mean(x), 2), median = round(median(x), 2)))
- wt <- wilcox.test(combined ~ group, data = sample_means, conf.int = TRUE)
- print(wt)
- cat("Hodges-Lehmann shift (c - n):", round(wt$estimate, 3), "\n")
- cat("95% CI:", round(wt$conf.int[1], 3), "to", round(wt$conf.int[2], 3), "\n")
- # AUC (Mann-Whitney probability of superiority) with bootstrap 95% CI
- x <- sample_means$combined[sample_means$group == "c"]
- y <- sample_means$combined[sample_means$group == "n"]
- n1 <- length(x); n2 <- length(y)
- AUC <- as.numeric(wt$statistic) / (n1 * n2)
- set.seed(1)
- B <- 10000
- aucs <- numeric(B)
- for (b in 1:B) {
- xb <- sample(x, replace = TRUE)
- yb <- sample(y, replace = TRUE)
- ranks <- rank(c(xb, yb))
- Ub <- sum(ranks[1:n1]) - n1 * (n1 + 1) / 2
- aucs[b] <- Ub / (n1 * n2)
- }
- ci_auc <- quantile(aucs, c(0.025, 0.975))
- cat("AUC (P[cryo > control]):", round(AUC, 3), "\n")
- cat("Bootstrap 95% CI:", round(ci_auc[1], 3), "to", round(ci_auc[2], 3), "\n")
- # Create ratings matrix (each row = one image, columns = raters)
- ratings_m_a <- cbind(df$m_score, df$a_score)
- cat("=== Interrater Reliability (M vs A) ===\n")
- cat("N images rated:", nrow(ratings_m_a), "\n\n")
- # ICC - two-way random, absolute agreement, single measures
- icc_result <- icc(ratings_m_a, model = "twoway", type = "agreement", unit = "single")
- cat("ICC:", round(icc_result$value, 3), "\n")
- cat("95% CI:", round(icc_result$lbound, 3), "to", round(icc_result$ubound, 3), "\n")
- # (i) Image and sample N per condition and region
- df$region <- ifelse(as.numeric(gsub("[cn]", "", df$sample)) <= 9, "gm", "wm")
- sample_means$region <- ifelse(as.numeric(gsub("[cn]", "", sample_means$sample)) <= 9, "gm", "wm")
- cat("=== Image counts by condition x region ===\n")
- print(table(df$group, df$region))
- cat("\n=== Sample counts by condition x region ===\n")
- print(table(sample_means$group, sample_means$region))
- # distribution plot
- df$region <- ifelse(as.numeric(gsub("[cn]", "", df$sample)) <= 9, "Grey matter", "White matter")
- df$group_label <- ifelse(df$group == "c", "Cryopreserved", "Control")
- df$sample <- factor(df$sample, levels = c("c7","c8","c9","n7","n8","n9","c10","c11","c12","n10","n11","n12"))
- p <- ggplot(df, aes(x = sample, y = combined, color = group_label)) +
- geom_jitter(width = 0.15, height = 0.05, alpha = 0.7, size = 2) +
- stat_summary(fun = median, geom = "crossbar", width = 0.5, color = "black", linewidth = 0.4) +
- facet_grid(. ~ region, scales = "free_x", space = "free_x") +
- scale_y_continuous(breaks = 1:5, limits = c(0.5, 5.5)) +
- scale_color_manual(values = c("Cryopreserved" = "#1f77b4", "Control" = "#d62728")) +
- labs(x = "Specimen", y = "Mean rater score per image (1 = best, 5 = worst)",
- color = NULL) +
- theme_bw() +
- theme(legend.position = "top",
- panel.grid.minor = element_blank())
- print(p)
cryo_em_data_analysis.R at commit 3f8b354, no license · at the source
Overview
- Apex Neuroscience, Salem, Oregon, United States of America
- Microscopy and Advanced Bioimaging Core, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
- Friedman Brain Institute, Departments of Pathology, Neuroscience, and Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
- Neuropathology Brain Bank & Research Core and Ronald M. Loeb Center for Alzheimer’s Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
Abstract
Long-term storage of aldehyde-fixed brain tissue is commonly performed in the fluid state. This has the potential to maintain morphology for many decades, but has been found to cause progressive loss of antigenicity over time for some biomolecules, motivating interest in alternative long-term preservation strategies, such as cryopreservation. While cryoprotection and subzero storage has been successfully used for brain tissue sections or blocks, methods for preserving whole brains using this approach have not been widely characterized. Here we present a protocol for preserving fixed whole brains using graded immersion cryoprotection followed by subzero temperature storage. We refer to this general strategy – aldehyde fixation followed by cryoprotectant loading and subzero storage – as aldehyde-based cryopreservation (ABC). Our method uses a gradual ramp-up of the osmotic concentration of cryoprotectants, leading to a final solution containing 50% (v/
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 2 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
andymckenzie/Aldehyde_based_cryopreservation
3f8b354fb869e2e617995c1ee25656e914d45f36, 2 June 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
- 27 September 2026: the link answers
1 file
- cryo_em_data_analysis.R, R, 97 lines, 2 matches
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 2 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
Datasets cited
- zenodo.org/
communities/ , at zenodo.org; found in “Data Availability”aldehyde_based_cryoprese rvation
Data Availability
Whole slide image and electron microscopy data can be accessed in a public community on Zenodo (https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 9 authors, 6 MeSH terms, 3 funders, 41 references, 2 RRIDs.
Cite
This paper
Garrood, M., Keberle, A., Slaughter, A., Sowa, A., Thorn, E. L., De Sanctis, C., Farrell, K., Crary, J. F., & McKenzie, A. T. (2026). Cryopreservation of aldehyde-fixed whole brains. PloS one, 21(8), e0344932. https://
BibTeX
@article{garrood2026cryo
author = {Garrood, Macy and Keberle, Alicia and Slaughter, Andria and Sowa, Allison and Thorn, Emma L and De Sanctis, Claudia and Farrell, Kurt and Crary, John F and McKenzie, Andrew T},
title = {{Cryopreservation of aldehyde-fixed whole brains}},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
volume = {21},
number = {8},
pages = {e0344932},
publisher = {PLOS},
issn = {1932-6203},
doi = {10.1371/
url = {https://
pmid = {42636208},
pmcid = {PMC13502592}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Garrood, Macy
AU - Keberle, Alicia
AU - Slaughter, Andria
AU - Sowa, Allison
AU - Thorn, Emma L
AU - De Sanctis, Claudia
AU - Farrell, Kurt
AU - Crary, John F
AU - McKenzie, Andrew T
TI - Cryopreservation of aldehyde-fixed whole brains
T2 - PloS one
J2 - PLoS One
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 21
IS - 8
SP - e0344932
SN - 1932-6203
PB - PLOS
DO - 10.1371/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1371/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Cryopreservation of aldehyde-fixed whole brains",
"container-title": "PloS one",
"author": [
{
"family": "Garrood",
"given": "Macy"
},
{
"family": "Keberle",
"given": "Alicia"
},
{
"family": "Slaughter",
"given": "Andria"
},
{
"family": "Sowa",
"given": "Allison"
},
{
"family": "Thorn",
"given": "Emma L"
},
{
"family": "De Sanctis",
"given": "Claudia"
},
{
"family": "Farrell",
"given": "Kurt"
},
{
"family": "Crary",
"given": "John F"
},
{
"family": "McKenzie",
"given": "Andrew T"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "21",
"issue": "8",
"page": "e0344932",
"DOI": "10.1371/
"PMID": "42636208",
"PMCID": "PMC13502592",
"ISSN": "1932-6203",
"publisher": "PLOS",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.3390/brainsci16080882 [code]
- How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review.Journal: Brain sciencesIn common: ggplot2, 2 references, author Andrew T McKenzie
- [2] doi:10.17879/freeneuropathology-2026-9411 [code]
- Brain extraction for fixed tissue banking: a technical report.Journal: Free neuropathologyIn common: ggplot2, 4 references
- [3] doi:10.17879/freeneuropathology-2026-9593
- Expansion microscopy of banked brain tissue.Journal: Free neuropathologyIn common: 3 references
- [4] doi:10.1007/s12021-026-09789-y [code]
- Optimizing Photogrammetry Parameters for 3D Reconstruction of Fresh Brain Specimens.Journal: NeuroinformaticsIn common: 2 references
- [5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74753-y [code]
- A human-specific microRNA controls the timing of excitatory synaptogenesis.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: ggplot2, 1 reference
- [6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1224 [code]
- Test-retest reliability analysis of resting-state EEG measures and their association with long-term memory in children and adults.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: ggplot2, 1 reference
- [7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1337 [code]
- Data quality biases normative models derived from fetal brain MRI.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: ggplot2, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1038/s43587-026-01204-0
- Fibronectin mediates APOE4-driven blood-brain barrier dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.Journal: Nature agingIn common: 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1002/mrm.70490 [code]
- Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.Journal: Magnetic resonance in medicineIn common: 1 reference
- [10] doi:10.1002/glia.70201 [code]
- Dorso-Ventral and Night-Day Regulation of Extracellular K&
lt;sup& gt;+& lt;/ sup& gt; Dynamics in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes. Journal: GliaIn common: 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 1 script, and 2 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:c27642d4078432bc…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
