How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review.
The 6 matches
- [1] § 3. Results and Discussion › 3.1. Study Selection ↔ ischemia_review_code.R, lines 118–139 · score 0.88 · xenon enhanced CT, Xe clearance, Xe CT, India ink, antipyrine, autoradiography
- [2] § 3. Results and Discussion › 3.1. Study Selection ↔ ischemia_review_code.R, lines 118–139 · score 0.81 · laser Doppler, laser speckle, functional capillary, intravital, microscopy, sidestream
- [3] § 2. Review Methods › 2.5. Data Extraction ↔ ischemia_review_code.R, lines 506–641 · score 0.69 · adequacy criterion, LOESS smoothers, pure blood, adequate perfusion, carbon black, interactive
- [4] § 3. Results and Discussion › 3.4. Qualitative Reperfusion Outcomes ↔ ischemia_review_code.R, lines 690–717 · score 0.68 · Wilcoxon rank sum, reactive hyperemia, absent, hypoperfusion, median, qualitative
- [5] § 3. Results and Discussion › 3.9. Study Quality ↔ ischemia_review_code.R, lines 155–187 · score 0.57 · publication year, quality scores, Blinding, Spearman, temperature, ischemia duration
- [6] § 2. Review Methods › 2.6. Data Synthesis ↔ ischemia_review_code.R, lines 316–377 · score 0.55 · pure blood, carbon black, quality assessments, LOESS, Smoothing, perfusion quality
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
R · 717 lines · 23 KB · no license · 6 matches
- library(dplyr)
- library(tidyr)
- library(ggplot2)
- library(patchwork)
- library(stringr)
- library(plotly)
- library(htmlwidgets)
- library(htmltools)
- library(glue)
- load_tsv <- function(path, encoding = "") {
- d <- read.delim(
- path,
- sep = "\t",
- header = TRUE,
- stringsAsFactors = FALSE,
- check.names = FALSE,
- na.strings = c("", "NA"),
- fileEncoding = encoding
- )
- d[-1, ]
- }
- ext <- load_tsv(
- "Data Extraction Fixed - Data Extraction2.tsv",
- encoding = "UTF-16LE"
- )
- sq <- load_tsv(
- "Data Extraction Fixed - Study Quality.tsv",
- encoding = "UTF-8"
- )
- parse_pct <- function(x) {
- x <- trimws(x); x[x %in% c("NR", "Cannot convert")] <- NA
- suppressWarnings(as.numeric(sub("%$", "", sub("^~", "", x))))
- }
- parse_brains <- function(x) {
- x <- trimws(x); x[x %in% c("NR", "Cannot convert", "N/A")] <- NA
- suppressWarnings(as.numeric(sub("^([0-9.]+).*", "\\1", sub("^~", "", x))))
- }
- parse_num <- function(x) suppressWarnings(as.numeric(sub("^~", "", trimws(x))))
- parse_n <- function(x) {
- x <- sub("^~", "", trimws(x))
- suppressWarnings(as.numeric(sub("^(\\d+).*", "\\1", x)))
- }
- # Unique per-paper key (PMID > DOI > Authors+Year label). paste(Authors, Year)
- # alone is NOT unique here (3 Cantu et al. 1969 papers, 2 Kågström et al. 1983,
- # 2 Fischer et al. 1996), so anything grouped on that string alone silently
- # collapses 60 papers to 56.
- make_study_key <- function(authors, year, pmid = NA, doi = NA, link = NA) {
- n <- length(authors)
- pmid <- rep_len(pmid, n)
- doi <- rep_len(doi, n)
- link <- rep_len(link, n)
- pmid_from_link <- ifelse(
- !is.na(link),
- sub(".*pubmed\\.ncbi\\.nlm\\.nih\\.gov/(\\d+).*", "\\1", link),
- NA
- )
- pmid_from_link[pmid_from_link == link] <- NA
- doi_from_link <- ifelse(
- !is.na(link) & is.na(pmid_from_link),
- sub(".*doi\\.org/(.+)$", "\\1", link),
- NA
- )
- doi_from_link[doi_from_link == link] <- NA
- pmid_val <- ifelse(!is.na(pmid) & pmid != "Not found.", pmid, pmid_from_link)
- doi_val <- ifelse(!is.na(doi) & doi != "Not found.", doi, doi_from_link)
- ifelse(
- !is.na(pmid_val), paste0("PMID:", pmid_val),
- ifelse(!is.na(doi_val), paste0("DOI:", tolower(trimws(doi_val))),
- paste0("LABEL:", authors, "_", year))
- )
- }
- d <- ext |>
- mutate(
- pct_brain = parse_pct(`Converted % Brain Perfused`),
- pct_brains = parse_brains(`% Brains Adequately Perfused`),
- isch = parse_num(`Ischemia Duration (min)`),
- n_arm = parse_n(`Sample Size (n)`),
- blood = `Blood vs. Non-Blood`,
- study = make_study_key(`Study Authors`, Year, link = Link)
- ) |>
- filter(isch <= 60)
- n_studies_check <- ext |>
- mutate(study = make_study_key(`Study Authors`, Year, link = Link)) |>
- pull(study) |> n_distinct()
- stopifnot(n_studies_check == 60)
- # ===========================================================
- # 0. Descriptive statistics
- # ===========================================================
- ext <- ext %>%
- mutate(species_clean = case_when(
- str_detect(`Species / Strain`, regex("^cat", ignore_case = TRUE)) ~ "cat",
- str_detect(`Species / Strain`, regex("^dog", ignore_case = TRUE)) ~ "dog",
- str_detect(`Species / Strain`, regex("^human", ignore_case = TRUE)) ~ "human",
- str_detect(`Species / Strain`, regex("^(pig|piglet)", ignore_case = TRUE)) ~ "pig",
- str_detect(`Species / Strain`, regex("^rabbit", ignore_case = TRUE)) ~ "rabbit",
- str_detect(`Species / Strain`, regex("^rat", ignore_case = TRUE)) ~ "rat",
- TRUE ~ NA_character_
- ))
- table(ext$species_clean)
- dur <- as.numeric(ext$`Ischemia Duration (min)`)
- median(dur[dur <= 120])
- fam <- function(x) {
- x <- tolower(x)
- dplyr::case_when(
- grepl("carbon|india ink|colloidal", x) ~ "Carbon black/India ink",
- grepl("microsphere", x) ~ "Microsphere CBF",
- grepl("antipyrine|autoradiograph", x) ~ "Antipyrine autoradiography",
- grepl("xe-ct|xe/ct|xenon-enhanced ct", x) ~ "Stable Xe-CT",
- grepl("xe |133xe|133-xenon|xenon clearance", x) ~ "133Xe clearance",
- grepl("fitc-albumin", x) ~ "FITC-albumin microscopy",
- grepl("functional capillary|fitc-dextran|sdf|sidestream", x) ~ "Intravital FCD/SDF",
- grepl("laser doppler|laser speckle", x) ~ "Laser Doppler/speckle",
- grepl("multiphoton", x) ~ "Multiphoton capillary RBC",
- grepl("angiograph", x) ~ "Angiography",
- grepl("asl-mri|arterial spin", x) ~ "ASL-MRI",
- grepl("pet ", x) ~ "PET CBF",
- grepl("h2 clearance|hydrogen clearance", x) ~ "H2 clearance",
- grepl("rbc suspension|benzidine", x) ~ "RBC/benzidine",
- grepl("thermocouple", x) ~ "Thermocouple",
- grepl("0-3 scale|semi-quantitative|qualitative multi-modal|histological grading", x) ~ "Qualitative grading",
- TRUE ~ paste0("UNCLASSIFIED: ", x)
- )
- }
- ext$method_family <- fam(ext$`Perfusion Quality Assessment Method`)
- sort(table(ext$method_family), decreasing = TRUE)
- # ===========================================================
- # 1. Overall dose-response: % brain perfused vs ischemia
- # ===========================================================
- cat("All cases: "); print(cor.test(d$isch, d$pct_brain, method = "spearman", exact = FALSE))
- cat("All cases: "); print(cor.test(d$isch, d$pct_brains, method = "spearman", exact = FALSE))
- # ===========================================================
- # 2. Study quality: distribution and simple correlations
- # ===========================================================
- cat("\n--- Study quality ---\n")
- yes_like <- function(x) grepl("^Yes", x, ignore.case = TRUE)
- sq2 <- sq |>
- mutate(
- q_isch = as.integer(yes_like(`Ischemia Duration Clearly Defined?`)),
- q_n = as.integer(yes_like(`Sample Size Explicitly Reported?`)),
- q_temp = as.integer(yes_like(`Temperature During Ischemia Reported?`)),
- q_method = as.integer(yes_like(`Perfusion Outcome Reproducibly Described?`)),
- q_blind = as.integer(yes_like(`Blinding Used in Outcome Assessment?`)),
- q_incl = as.integer(yes_like(`Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Stated?`)),
- quality = q_isch + q_n + q_temp + q_method + q_blind + q_incl,
- study = make_study_key(`Study Authors`, Year, pmid = PMID, doi = DOI),
- year_num = suppressWarnings(as.numeric(Year))
- )
- sq_one <- sq2 |> group_by(study) |>
- summarise(quality = max(quality),
- year_num = first(year_num),
- across(starts_with("q_"), max), .groups = "drop")
- stopifnot(nrow(sq_one) == 60)
- cat("Item-level 'Yes' rates:\n")
- sq_one |> summarise(across(starts_with("q_"), mean)) |> print()
- cat("\nQuality score distribution (per study):\n"); print(table(sq_one$quality))
- cat("\nQuality vs publication year (per study):\n")
- print(cor.test(sq_one$year_num, sq_one$quality, method = "spearman", exact = FALSE))
- per_study <- d |> filter(!is.na(pct_brain)) |>
- group_by(study) |>
- summarise(mean_pct = mean(pct_brain), mean_isch = mean(isch), .groups = "drop") |>
- left_join(sq_one |> select(study, quality), by = "study")
- cat("\nQuality vs mean ischemia duration (per study):\n")
- print(cor.test(per_study$quality, per_study$mean_isch, method = "spearman", exact = FALSE))
- # ===========================================================
- # 2b. Quality vs perfusate type
- # ===========================================================
- get_mode <- function(x) {
- x <- x[!is.na(x)]
- if (length(x) == 0) return(NA)
- names(sort(table(x), decreasing = TRUE))[1]
- }
- study_cov <- ext |>
- mutate(
- study = make_study_key(`Study Authors`, Year, link = Link),
- isch = parse_num(`Ischemia Duration (min)`),
- blood = `Blood vs. Non-Blood`
- ) |>
- filter(isch <= 60) |>
- group_by(study) |>
- summarise(blood_mode = get_mode(blood), .groups = "drop") |>
- left_join(sq_one |> select(study, quality), by = "study")
- cat("\nQuality vs blood/non-blood:\n")
- print(kruskal.test(quality ~ blood_mode, data = study_cov))
- print(study_cov |> group_by(blood_mode) |> summarise(mean_q = mean(quality), n = n()))
- # ===========================================================
- # Plots
- # ===========================================================
- classify_perf <- function(blood_raw, method) {
- carbon <- grepl("carbon", method, ignore.case = TRUE)
- case_when(
- blood_raw == "Blood" ~ "Pure blood",
- blood_raw == "Mixed" ~ "Mixed blood",
- blood_raw == "Non-Blood" & carbon ~ "Carbon black",
- blood_raw == "Non-Blood" & !carbon ~ "Other non-blood",
- TRUE ~ NA_character_
- )
- }
- d <- d |>
- mutate(perfusate = classify_perf(blood, `Perfusion Quality Assessment Method`),
- perfusate = factor(perfusate,
- levels = c("Pure blood","Mixed blood",
- "Carbon black","Other non-blood")))
- perf_cols <- c(
- "Pure blood" = "#0072B2", # blue
- "Mixed blood" = "#CC79A7", # magenta
- "Carbon black" = "#D55E00", # orange
- "Other non-blood" = "#666666" # neutral gray
- )
- loess_grid <- function(df, ycol, span = 2) {
- df |>
- filter(!is.na(.data[[ycol]]), !is.na(isch)) |>
- group_by(perfusate) |>
- group_modify(~{
- fit <- loess(
- formula = reformulate("log10(isch)", response = ycol),
- data = .x,
- span = span,
- degree = 1
- )
- xgrid <- exp(seq(
- log(min(.x$isch)),
- log(max(.x$isch)),
- length.out = 200
- ))
- pred <- predict(
- fit,
- newdata = data.frame(isch = xgrid)
- )
- tibble(
- isch = xgrid,
- fit = pmin(100, pmax(0, pred))
- )
- }) |>
- ungroup()
- }
- make_plot <- function(df, ycol, ylab, title_txt) {
- df_clean <- df |>
- filter(!is.na(.data[[ycol]]), !is.na(perfusate)) |>
- mutate(
- perfusate = droplevels(perfusate),
- # Unknown n is plotted at the minimum point size
- n_plot = ifelse(is.na(n_arm), 1, n_arm),
- # Only relevant to Figure 3
- criterion_source = case_when(
- # Explicitly identified as paper-defined in the extraction
- grepl(
- "paper-defined",
- `% Brains Adequately Perfused`,
- ignore.case = TRUE
- ) |
- grepl(
- "paper-defined",
- `% Brains Quote`,
- ignore.case = TRUE
- ) ~ "Study-defined criterion",
- # Ames bloodless-ischemia experiments:
- # adequacy based directly on the paper's qualitative filling description
- `Study Authors` == "Ames et al." &
- grepl(
- "complete filling|poor filling",
- `% Brains Quote`,
- ignore.case = TRUE
- ) ~ "Study-defined criterion",
- # Kågström: presence/absence of no-reflow was the study's outcome
- `Study Authors` == "Kågström et al." &
- grepl(
- "no-reflow|no no-reflow",
- `% Brains Quote`,
- ignore.case = TRUE
- ) ~ "Study-defined criterion",
- # Dietrich: study's own qualitative perfusion-deficit classification
- `Study Authors` == "Dietrich et al." &
- grepl(
- "severe perfusion deficits",
- `% Brains Quote`,
- ignore.case = TRUE
- ) ~ "Study-defined criterion",
- # Everything else in Figure 3 uses the review-defined adequacy rule
- TRUE ~ "Review-defined criterion"
- ),
- criterion_source = factor(
- criterion_source,
- levels = c(
- "Review-defined criterion",
- "Study-defined criterion"
- )
- ),
- source_id = dplyr::case_when(
- grepl("pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov", Link) ~
- paste0(
- "PubMed PMID: ",
- sub(".*/([0-9]+)/?$", "\\1", Link)
- ),
- grepl("doi.org", Link) ~
- paste0(
- "DOI: ",
- sub(".*doi\\.org/", "", Link)
- ),
- TRUE ~ "Source available by clicking point"
- ),
- outcome_label = ifelse(
- is.na(`Additional Outcome Specifier`),
- "",
- `Additional Outcome Specifier`
- ),
- hover = glue::glue(
- "<b style='color:#0b2545'>{`Study Authors`} ({Year})</b><br>",
- "{outcome_label}<br><br>",
- "<b>{isch} min · {round(.data[[ycol]], 1)}% perfused</b><br>",
- "n = {ifelse(is.na(n_arm), 'not reported', n_arm)} · {`Species / Strain`}<br><br>",
- "<b>Perfusate:</b> {perfusate}<br>",
- "<b>Adequacy criterion:</b> {criterion_source}<br>",
- "<b>Assessment:</b> {`Perfusion Quality Assessment Method`}<br><br>",
- "<b>{source_id}</b><br>",
- "<span style='color:#777'>Click point to open source paper.</span>"
- )
- )
- df_smooth <- df_clean |>
- filter(perfusate %in% c("Pure blood", "Carbon black"))
- smooth_dat <- loess_grid(
- df_smooth,
- ycol,
- span = 2
- )
- # Figure 3: shape = adequacy criterion
- if (ycol == "pct_brains") {
- ggplot(df_clean, aes(
- x = isch,
- y = .data[[ycol]],
- colour = perfusate,
- size = n_plot,
- shape = criterion_source,
- text = hover,
- key = Link,
- customdata = Link
- )) +
- geom_jitter(width = 0.02, alpha = 0.4) +
- geom_line(
- data = smooth_dat,
- aes(
- x = isch,
- y = fit,
- colour = perfusate,
- group = perfusate
- ),
- linewidth = 1,
- inherit.aes = FALSE,
- show.legend = FALSE
- ) +
- scale_shape_manual(
- values = c(
- "Review-defined criterion" = 16,
- "Study-defined criterion" = 17
- ),
- name = "Adequacy criterion"
- ) +
- scale_colour_manual(values = perf_cols, drop = TRUE) +
- scale_size_continuous(
- range = c(1.5, 7),
- breaks = c(2, 5, 10, 20),
- limits = c(1, NA)
- ) +
- scale_x_log10(
- breaks = c(2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60),
- minor_breaks = NULL
- ) +
- labs(
- x = "Ischemia duration (min, log scale)",
- y = ylab,
- colour = "Perfusate",
- size = "n per arm",
- title = title_txt
- ) +
- coord_cartesian(ylim = c(-5, 105)) +
- theme_bw(base_size = 13) +
- theme(
- legend.position = "top",
- legend.box = "vertical",
- legend.margin = margin(2, 2, 2, 2),
- legend.spacing.y = unit(2, "pt"),
- plot.title = element_text(size = 16),
- axis.title = element_text(size = 14),
- axis.text = element_text(size = 12),
- legend.text = element_text(size = 12),
- legend.title = element_text(size = 13)
- )
- } else {
- # Figure 2: no shape encoding needed
- ggplot(df_clean, aes(
- x = isch,
- y = .data[[ycol]],
- colour = perfusate,
- size = n_plot,
- text = hover,
- key = Link,
- customdata = Link
- )) +
- geom_jitter(width = 0.02, alpha = 0.4) +
- geom_line(
- data = smooth_dat,
- aes(
- x = isch,
- y = fit,
- colour = perfusate,
- group = perfusate
- ),
- linewidth = 1,
- inherit.aes = FALSE,
- show.legend = FALSE
- ) +
- scale_colour_manual(values = perf_cols, drop = TRUE) +
- scale_size_continuous(
- range = c(1.5, 7),
- breaks = c(2, 5, 10, 20),
- limits = c(1, NA)
- ) +
- scale_x_log10(
- breaks = c(2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60),
- minor_breaks = NULL
- ) +
- labs(
- x = "Ischemia duration (min, log scale)",
- y = ylab,
- colour = "Perfusate",
- size = "n per arm",
- title = title_txt
- ) +
- coord_cartesian(ylim = c(-5, 105)) +
- theme_bw(base_size = 13) +
- theme(
- legend.position = "top",
- legend.box = "vertical",
- legend.margin = margin(2, 2, 2, 2),
- legend.spacing.y = unit(2, "pt"),
- plot.title = element_text(size = 16),
- axis.title = element_text(size = 14),
- axis.text = element_text(size = 12),
- legend.text = element_text(size = 12),
- legend.title = element_text(size = 13)
- )
- }
- }
- make_interactive <- function(p, output_file, page_title) {
- p_interactive <- p +
- ggplot2::labs(title = NULL) +
- ggplot2::theme(plot.title = ggplot2::element_blank())
- fig <- plotly::ggplotly(
- p_interactive,
- tooltip = "text",
- width = 1500,
- height = 900
- ) |>
- plotly::layout(
- showlegend = FALSE,
- autosize = TRUE,
- hoverlabel = list(
- bgcolor = "white",
- bordercolor = "#cccccc",
- font = list(color = "#111111", size = 13, family = "Arial")
- ),
- margin = list(l = 90, r = 30, t = 20, b = 80)
- ) |>
- htmlwidgets::onRender("
- function(el, x) {
- el.on('plotly_click', function(d) {
- var pt = d.points[0];
- var url = null;
- if (pt.customdata) {
- url = pt.customdata;
- } else if (pt.data.customdata && pt.data.customdata[pt.pointNumber]) {
- url = pt.data.customdata[pt.pointNumber];
- } else if (pt.data.key && pt.data.key[pt.pointNumber]) {
- url = pt.data.key[pt.pointNumber];
- }
- if (url && url !== 'NA' && url !== 'Not found.') {
- window.open(url, '_blank');
- }
- });
- }
- ")
- if (page_title == "Frequency of adequate perfusion") {
- legend_html <- htmltools::tags$div(
- style = "
- font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
- font-size: 15px;
- color: #222;
- margin: 0 0 12px 0;
- line-height: 1.5;
- ",
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Perfusate: "),
- htmltools::tags$span(style = "color:#0072B2;", "● Pure blood "),
- htmltools::tags$span(style = "color:#D55E00;", "● Carbon black "),
- htmltools::tags$span(style = "color:#CC79A7;", "● Mixed blood "),
- htmltools::tags$span(style = "color:#666666;", "● Other non-blood")
- ),
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Shape: "),
- htmltools::tags$span("● Review-defined adequacy criterion "),
- htmltools::tags$span("▲ Study-defined adequacy criterion")
- ),
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Size: "),
- htmltools::tags$span(
- "larger points = larger n per arm; unreported n plotted at minimum size"
- )
- ),
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Trend: "),
- htmltools::tags$span(
- "LOESS smoothers are shown for pure blood and carbon black as descriptive trends; no inferential confidence intervals are shown."
- )
- )
- )
- } else {
- legend_html <- htmltools::tags$div(
- style = "
- font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
- font-size: 15px;
- color: #222;
- margin: 0 0 12px 0;
- line-height: 1.5;
- ",
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Perfusate: "),
- htmltools::tags$span(style = "color:#0072B2;", "● Pure blood "),
- htmltools::tags$span(style = "color:#D55E00;", "● Carbon black ")
- ),
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Size: "),
- htmltools::tags$span(
- "larger points = larger n per arm; unreported n plotted at minimum size"
- )
- ),
- htmltools::tags$div(
- htmltools::tags$b("Trend: "),
- htmltools::tags$span(
- "LOESS smoothers are shown for pure blood and carbon black as descriptive trends; no inferential confidence intervals are shown."
- )
- )
- )
- }
- fig_page <- htmlwidgets::prependContent(
- fig,
- htmltools::tags$div(
- style = "padding: 30px; max-width: 1600px; margin: 0 auto;",
- htmltools::tags$h1(page_title),
- legend_html
- )
- )
- fig_page <- htmlwidgets::appendContent(
- fig_page,
- htmltools::tags$div(
- style = "padding: 0 30px 30px 30px; max-width: 1600px; margin: 0 auto;",
- htmltools::tags$p(
- class = "note",
- "Hover over points for study details. Click a point to open the source paper."
- )
- )
- )
- htmlwidgets::saveWidget(
- fig_page,
- file = output_file,
- selfcontained = TRUE,
- title = page_title
- )
- }
- fig1a <- make_plot(d, "pct_brain", "% of brain perfused", "Spatial completeness of perfusion")
- ggsave("fig1a_pct_brain.png", fig1a, width = 7.5, height = 7, dpi = 150)
- fig1b <- make_plot(d, "pct_brains", "% of brains adequately perfused", "Frequency of adequate perfusion")
- ggsave("fig1b_pct_brains.png", fig1b, width = 7.5, height = 7, dpi = 150)
- make_interactive(
- fig1a,
- "fig1a_pct_brain_interactive.html",
- "Spatial completeness of perfusion"
- )
- make_interactive(
- fig1b,
- "fig1b_pct_brains_interactive.html",
- "Frequency of adequate perfusion"
- )
- # ===========================================================
- # 3. Arms not represented in spatial completeness figure (qualitative CBF arms)
- # ===========================================================
- d2 <- ext |>
- mutate(
- pct_brain = parse_pct(`Converted % Brain Perfused`),
- pct_brains = parse_brains(`% Brains Adequately Perfused`),
- isch = parse_num(`Ischemia Duration (min)`),
- cat_raw = trimws(`Perfusion Quality Category`)
- ) |>
- filter(isch <= 60)
- not_in_fig2 <- d2 |> filter(is.na(pct_brain))
- qual_cat <- function(x) {
- x <- tolower(x)
- case_when(
- grepl("hyperperfusion|hyperemia", x) ~ "Reactive hyperemia",
- grepl("no-reflow absent", x) ~ "No-reflow absent",
- grepl("no-reflow present", x) ~ "No-reflow present",
- grepl("hypoperfusion", x) ~ "Hypoperfusion (other)",
- grepl("qualitative flow present", x) ~ "Qualitative flow present",
- grepl("qualitative flow absent", x) ~ "Qualitative flow absent",
- TRUE ~ paste0("OTHER: ", x)
- )
- }
- not_in_fig2 <- not_in_fig2 |>
- mutate(
- qcat = qual_cat(cat_raw),
- tier = case_when(
- qcat %in% c("Reactive hyperemia", "No-reflow absent",
- "Qualitative flow present") ~ "adequate",
- qcat == "Hypoperfusion (other)" ~ "reduced",
- qcat %in% c("No-reflow present",
- "Qualitative flow absent") ~ "failed")
- )
- cat("\n--- Arms not in Fig 2, by qualitative category ---\n")
- print(table(not_in_fig2$qcat))
- not_in_fig2 |>
- group_by(tier) |>
- summarise(n = n(), median_isch = median(isch, na.rm = TRUE),
- q25 = quantile(isch, .25, na.rm = TRUE),
- q75 = quantile(isch, .75, na.rm = TRUE),
- min = min(isch, na.rm = TRUE),
- max = max(isch, na.rm = TRUE), .groups = "drop") |>
- as.data.frame() |> print()
- cat("\nAdequate vs failed tier, ischemia duration (Wilcoxon rank-sum):\n")
- print(wilcox.test(
- not_in_fig2 |> filter(tier == "adequate") |> pull(isch),
- not_in_fig2 |> filter(tier == "failed") |> pull(isch)
- ))
ischemia_review_code.R at commit 2d68580, no license · at the source
Overview
- Apex Neuroscience, Salem, OR 97317, USA; (J.K.); (D.W.)
- Nectome, Vancouver, WA 98682, USA
- European Institute for Brain Research, 1013LE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
Highlights: What are the main findings?
How long the brain remains perfusable after circulatory arrest still needs to be established definitely.
Perfusion quality declines with increasing duration of global cerebral ischemia, but the available evidence does not identify a consistent sharp temporal threshold.
What are the implications of the main findings?
Standardized, precise measures of perfusion quality are needed at the level of microvasculature.
The perfusability window of the human brain may be extendable through pre-mortem or post-mortem interventions. This will require consideration not only of efficacy but also of practical, ethical, and legal constraints.
Abstract: Background: Global cerebral ischemia initiates a cascade of pathophysiological changes that progressively impair subsequent perfusion of brain tissue. Some authors have proposed that adequate cerebral perfusion becomes impossible after approximately 10–30 min of global ischemia. However, the extant evidence base for this threshold and its variations across studies has not yet been systematically examined. Objective: To synthesize the literature on post-ischemic cerebral perfusion success as a function of ischemia duration. Methods: We searched PubMed (11 February 2026) for studies of global cerebral ischemia in animal or human models that reported quantitative or categorical measures of perfusion quality. Eligible studies included those assessing perfusion via restoration of blood flow, via external perfusion of non-blood solutions, and/
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 6 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
andymckenzie/Ischemic_perfusion_review
2d685802b951125875e0ea9b9f0b591abe326829, 11 August 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
- 27 September 2026: the link answers
2 files
- ischemia_review_code.R, R, 717 lines, 6 matches
- README.md, Text, 3 lines
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 6 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data Availability Statement
R code and data used for analysis are available at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 7 keywords, 77 references.
Cite
This paper
Kalfus, J., Ward, D., Wróbel, B., & McKenzie, A. T. (2026). How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review. Brain sciences, 16(8), 882. https://
BibTeX
@article{kalfus2026how,
author = {Kalfus, Jeremy and Ward, Devin and Wróbel, Borys and McKenzie, Andrew T},
title = {{How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review}},
journal = {Brain sciences},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
volume = {16},
number = {8},
pages = {882},
publisher = {Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)},
issn = {2076-3425},
doi = {10.3390/
url = {https://
pmid = {42651190},
pmcid = {PMC13510562}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Kalfus, Jeremy
AU - Ward, Devin
AU - Wróbel, Borys
AU - McKenzie, Andrew T
TI - How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review
T2 - Brain sciences
J2 - Brain Sci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 16
IS - 8
SP - 882
SN - 2076-3425
PB - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
DO - 10.3390/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.3390/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "How Long Is the Brain Perfusable After Global Ischemia? A Systematic Review",
"container-title": "Brain sciences",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kalfus",
"given": "Jeremy"
},
{
"family": "Ward",
"given": "Devin"
},
{
"family": "Wróbel",
"given": "Borys"
},
{
"family": "McKenzie",
"given": "Andrew T"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "16",
"issue": "8",
"page": "882",
"DOI": "10.3390/
"PMID": "42651190",
"PMCID": "PMC13510562",
"ISSN": "2076-3425",
"publisher": "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
19
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0344932 [code]
- Cryopreservation of aldehyde-fixed whole brains.Journal: PloS oneIn common: ggplot2, 2 references, author Andrew T McKenzie
- [2] doi:10.17879/freeneuropathology-2026-9411 [code]
- Brain extraction for fixed tissue banking: a technical report.Journal: Free neuropathologyIn common: ggplot2, tidyverse, 3 references
- [3] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115196 [code]
- Transcriptional and cellular maturation of the chick spinal cord in the context of distinct neuromuscular circuits.Journal: iScienceIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool, other
- [4] doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2026.102922 [code]
- Spatially resolved transcriptomics identifies intercellular signaling post-ischemic stroke that controls neural stem cell proliferation.Journal: Stem cell reportsIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool, stroke
- [5] doi:10.1038/s41514-026-00397-3 [code]
- Nasal administration of Protollin enhances monocyte phagocytosis and decreases CD8&
lt;sup& gt;+& lt;/ sup& gt; T cell cytotoxicity in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease: a Phase 1 clinical trial. Journal: npj agingIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool, clinical / translational - [6] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag176 [code]
- Tau topography subtypes account for clinical heterogeneity and longitudinal trajectories in early-onset Alzheimer's disease.Journal: Brain communicationsIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool, clinical / translational
- [7] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10957-8 [code]
- Brain defence by the extracellular matrix protein Cochlin.Journal: Communications biologyIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool
- [8] doi:10.1038/s43587-026-01207-x [code]
- A microprotein atlas of the human frontal cortex in Alzheimer's disease.Journal: Nature agingIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool
- [9] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76762-3 [code]
- PD-1 regulates CD4&
lt;sup& gt;+& lt;/ sup& gt; T cell-mediated CD8& lt;sup& gt;+& lt;/ sup& gt; T cell responses in the brain to balance viral control and neuroinflammation. Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool - [10] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeg3223 [code]
- The extreme diversity of retinal amacrine cells has deep evolutionary roots.Journal: Science advancesIn common: Plotly, patchwork, ggplot2, 1 other tool
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 1 script, and 6 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:b7cc8874fabcdd03…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
