YOLO-LS: a novel deep learning framework for brain tumor segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Overview

1. The First Clinical Medical College, The Affiliated People’s Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian China
2. The Affiliated People’s Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian China

Abstract

Brain tumors exhibit high heterogeneity in morphology, texture, and location, making accurate recognition and segmentation critical for clinical diagnosis, surgical planning, and prognosis evaluation. However, manual annotation of MRI scans is hindered by subjective bias and inefficiency. Furthermore, existing automated frameworks often face a trade-off between segmentation precision—particularly at infiltrative boundaries—and the computational efficiency required for deployment in resource-constrained environments. To address these challenges, this study proposes YOLO-LS (Lightweight Segmentation), an enhanced framework based on the YOLO11n-seg architecture designed for efficient detection and high-precision segmentation of brain tumors. The methodology introduces three key innovations: (1) integrating ShuffleNet V1 as a lightweight backbone to significantly reduce parameter count and computational complexity via pointwise grouped convolutions; (2) incorporating the DySample dynamic upsampling mechanism to mitigate the loss of fine-grained semantic details inherent in traditional interpolation, thereby improving the recovery of tumor boundaries; and (3) optimizing the neck network with a C3k2-PoolingFormer module to facilitate efficient cross-scale feature fusion and global context capture. The model was trained and tested on the Figshare dataset (3,064 images) using five-fold cross-validation and externally validated on an independent Kaggle dataset (300 images). Results demonstrate that YOLO-LS achieved a bounding box mAP50 of 0.953 ± 0.011, a Dice coefficient of 0.91 ± 0.01, and a 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) of 4.35 ± 0.34 mm on the internal test set, the latter indicating superior boundary adherence compared to baseline models (paired t-test, p < 0.05 for all key metrics). Notably, the model reduced computational cost to 8.1 GFLOPs (a 15.6% reduction) while achieving an increase of 2.9% points in mAP50 compared to the baseline YOLO11n-seg. Comparative analyses with state-of-the-art architectures, including U-Net, SegNet, Swin-UNet, and VM-UNet, confirmed the efficacy of these improvements. Furthermore, Grad-CAM heatmaps validated the model’s precise focus on tumor core and edge regions. On the external test set, the model exhibited strong generalization with a Dice coefficient of 0.895. These findings indicate that YOLO-LS achieves an effective balance between precision, efficiency, and interpretability, demonstrating significant potential for assisting diagnostic workflows in resource-constrained clinical environments.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• kaggle.com/datasets/ashkhagan, at Kaggle; found in “Data availability”
• kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, at Kaggle; found in “Data availability”

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the following public repositories: The Figshare brain tumor dataset is available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ashkhagan/figshare-brain-tumor-dataset (as referenced in citations 31 and 32). The Kaggle brain tumor MRI dataset is available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar/brain-tumor-mri-dataset (as referenced in citation 33). No new datasets were generated in this study.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 11 keywords, 6 MeSH terms, 26 references.

Cite

This paper

Chen, J., Hu, Y., Yang, T., Sun, Z., Xie, L., & Zhao, H. (2026). YOLO-LS: a novel deep learning framework for brain tumor segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Scientific reports, 16(1), 20151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48825-4

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1875642

Convolutional neural networks in brain disease diagnosis: a unified review of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and brain tumor classification.

Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/ashkhagan, kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

[2] doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1834400

BrainFusionNet: an attention-augmented deep convolutional framework with hybrid loss optimisation and test-time augmentation for multi-class brain tumour detection in magnetic resonance images.

Journal: Frontiers in oncology

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 2 references

[3] doi:10.1002/acm2.70560 [code]

Hybrid CNN-GCN framework for brain tumor MRI classification: A graph-based approach to smart healthcare diagnostics.

Journal: Journal of applied clinical medical physics

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 2 references

[4] doi:10.1186/s40708-026-00325-x

CAE-BrainNet: a statistically validated class-adaptive attention ensemble model for explainable brain tumor classification from MRI.

Journal: Brain informatics

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 2 references

[5] doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1806663

A denoising autoencoder-enhanced ResNet 50 framework for explainable brain tumor classification using MRI.

Journal: Frontiers in oncology

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.3390/s26092822

Multi-Chaotic HEOA for Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search: Brain Tumor Classification on FPGA.

Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1155/ijbi/5318118

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using U-Net With ResNet50 Encoder for Enhanced MRI Analysis.

Journal: International journal of biomedical imaging

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0344291

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

Journal: PloS one

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-44957-9

Multimodal deep feature fusion with transformer for brain tumor classification from magnetic resonance imaging.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1186/s40708-026-00303-3 [code]

BrainFusionNet: a deep learning and XAI model to understand local, global, and sequential features of MRI images for improved brain tumour detection.

Journal: Brain informatics

In common: kaggle.com/datasets/ashkhagan, methods / tools, structural MRI / diffusion, other condition

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.